框架

E. Romann
{"title":"框架","authors":"E. Romann","doi":"10.1017/9781107415157.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"must therefore protective guarantees of human the of development. perfect with the of ABSTRACT: In the world of employment we can find several aspects that have effects on the labour market. Labour market cannot be independent from the legal regulation of employment; moreover – according to the tendencies – labour market processes basically define the role of labour law. A fundamental difference can be observed between the approach of Anglo-Saxon countries and researchers and the viewpoint of the continental law systems. In this paper the emphasized question is analyzed through these two different approaches according to the following premise: the Anglo-Saxon legal thinking defining the current development of labour law bears significant differences related to the labour law regulation – which means the direct regulation of the labour market – and to the legal guarantees behind employment as well. From the viewpoint of the labour market, two main questions are examined in this paper: on the one hand, the expected and necessary level and method of public intervention in connection with social rights, and on the other hand the depth of the intervention of labour law into the social relations driven by the market.","PeriodicalId":123956,"journal":{"name":"Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"331","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Framework\",\"authors\":\"E. Romann\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781107415157.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"must therefore protective guarantees of human the of development. perfect with the of ABSTRACT: In the world of employment we can find several aspects that have effects on the labour market. Labour market cannot be independent from the legal regulation of employment; moreover – according to the tendencies – labour market processes basically define the role of labour law. A fundamental difference can be observed between the approach of Anglo-Saxon countries and researchers and the viewpoint of the continental law systems. In this paper the emphasized question is analyzed through these two different approaches according to the following premise: the Anglo-Saxon legal thinking defining the current development of labour law bears significant differences related to the labour law regulation – which means the direct regulation of the labour market – and to the legal guarantees behind employment as well. From the viewpoint of the labour market, two main questions are examined in this paper: on the one hand, the expected and necessary level and method of public intervention in connection with social rights, and on the other hand the depth of the intervention of labour law into the social relations driven by the market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"331\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107415157.019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107415157.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 331

摘要

因此必须保护保障人的发展。摘要:在就业领域,我们可以发现有几个方面会对劳动力市场产生影响。劳动力市场不能独立于就业的法律规制;此外,根据趋势,劳动力市场过程基本上确定了劳动法的作用。盎格鲁-撒克逊国家和研究者的研究方法与大陆法系的观点有着根本的不同。本文通过这两种不同的方法对所强调的问题进行分析,但前提是:界定当前劳动法发展的盎格鲁-撒克逊法律思维在劳动法规制(即对劳动力市场的直接规制)和就业背后的法律保障方面存在显著差异。本文从劳动力市场的角度考察了两个主要问题:一方面,与社会权利相关的公共干预的预期和必要水平和方法;另一方面,劳动法对市场驱动的社会关系的干预的深度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Framework
must therefore protective guarantees of human the of development. perfect with the of ABSTRACT: In the world of employment we can find several aspects that have effects on the labour market. Labour market cannot be independent from the legal regulation of employment; moreover – according to the tendencies – labour market processes basically define the role of labour law. A fundamental difference can be observed between the approach of Anglo-Saxon countries and researchers and the viewpoint of the continental law systems. In this paper the emphasized question is analyzed through these two different approaches according to the following premise: the Anglo-Saxon legal thinking defining the current development of labour law bears significant differences related to the labour law regulation – which means the direct regulation of the labour market – and to the legal guarantees behind employment as well. From the viewpoint of the labour market, two main questions are examined in this paper: on the one hand, the expected and necessary level and method of public intervention in connection with social rights, and on the other hand the depth of the intervention of labour law into the social relations driven by the market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信