消除具有最小类型的隐蔽流

D. Volpano, Geoffrey Smith
{"title":"消除具有最小类型的隐蔽流","authors":"D. Volpano, Geoffrey Smith","doi":"10.1109/CSFW.1997.596807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A type system is given that eliminates two kinds of covert flows in an imperative programming language. The first kind arises from nontermination and the other from partial operations that can raise exceptions. The key idea is to limit the source of nontermination in the language to constructs with minimum typings, and to evaluate partial operations within expressions of try commands which also have minimum typings. A mutual progress theorem is proved that basically states that no two executions of a well-typed program can be distinguished on the basis of nontermination versus abnormal termination due to a partial operation. The proof uses a new style of programming language semantics which we call a natural transition semantics.","PeriodicalId":305235,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 10th Computer Security Foundations Workshop","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"175","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eliminating covert flows with minimum typings\",\"authors\":\"D. Volpano, Geoffrey Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSFW.1997.596807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A type system is given that eliminates two kinds of covert flows in an imperative programming language. The first kind arises from nontermination and the other from partial operations that can raise exceptions. The key idea is to limit the source of nontermination in the language to constructs with minimum typings, and to evaluate partial operations within expressions of try commands which also have minimum typings. A mutual progress theorem is proved that basically states that no two executions of a well-typed program can be distinguished on the basis of nontermination versus abnormal termination due to a partial operation. The proof uses a new style of programming language semantics which we call a natural transition semantics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":305235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 10th Computer Security Foundations Workshop\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"175\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 10th Computer Security Foundations Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSFW.1997.596807\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 10th Computer Security Foundations Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSFW.1997.596807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 175

摘要

给出了在命令式编程语言中消除两种隐蔽流的类型系统。第一种来自非终止,另一种来自可能引发异常的部分操作。关键思想是将语言中的非终止源限制为具有最小类型的构造,并在具有最小类型的try命令的表达式中计算部分操作。证明了一个互进定理,它基本上说明了一个类型良好的程序的两次执行不能根据非终止和由于部分操作而导致的异常终止来区分。证明使用了一种新的编程语言语义,我们称之为自然转换语义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eliminating covert flows with minimum typings
A type system is given that eliminates two kinds of covert flows in an imperative programming language. The first kind arises from nontermination and the other from partial operations that can raise exceptions. The key idea is to limit the source of nontermination in the language to constructs with minimum typings, and to evaluate partial operations within expressions of try commands which also have minimum typings. A mutual progress theorem is proved that basically states that no two executions of a well-typed program can be distinguished on the basis of nontermination versus abnormal termination due to a partial operation. The proof uses a new style of programming language semantics which we call a natural transition semantics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信