英国社会学本科评估的延续与变化:对哈里森和米尔斯的回应

J. Burnett
{"title":"英国社会学本科评估的延续与变化:对哈里森和米尔斯的回应","authors":"J. Burnett","doi":"10.11120/elss.2014.00024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Harrison and Mears draw a fundamental conclusion from their work: that there has been more continuity than change in undergraduate assessment in Sociology in the UK. That there has been some change is clear. The sense that this is slower than hoped for and, furthermore, that the change that has occurred has been greater in the ‘post-1992s’ than the ‘pre-1992s’ and also that the external examining system (one of the potential mechanisms for changing this) is to some extent bifurcated, raises questions about the nature and scale of the innovation which has occurred.","PeriodicalId":147930,"journal":{"name":"Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuity and Change in Undergraduate Assessment in Sociology in the UK: A Response to Harrison and Mears\",\"authors\":\"J. Burnett\",\"doi\":\"10.11120/elss.2014.00024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Harrison and Mears draw a fundamental conclusion from their work: that there has been more continuity than change in undergraduate assessment in Sociology in the UK. That there has been some change is clear. The sense that this is slower than hoped for and, furthermore, that the change that has occurred has been greater in the ‘post-1992s’ than the ‘pre-1992s’ and also that the external examining system (one of the potential mechanisms for changing this) is to some extent bifurcated, raises questions about the nature and scale of the innovation which has occurred.\",\"PeriodicalId\":147930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11120/elss.2014.00024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11120/elss.2014.00024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Harrison和Mears从他们的工作中得出了一个基本结论:在英国,社会学本科评估的连续性大于变化。有一些变化是显而易见的。这种感觉比希望的要慢,而且,“1992年后”发生的变化比“1992年前”更大,而且外部检查系统(改变这种情况的潜在机制之一)在某种程度上是分岔的,这引发了对已经发生的创新的性质和规模的质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Continuity and Change in Undergraduate Assessment in Sociology in the UK: A Response to Harrison and Mears
Abstract Harrison and Mears draw a fundamental conclusion from their work: that there has been more continuity than change in undergraduate assessment in Sociology in the UK. That there has been some change is clear. The sense that this is slower than hoped for and, furthermore, that the change that has occurred has been greater in the ‘post-1992s’ than the ‘pre-1992s’ and also that the external examining system (one of the potential mechanisms for changing this) is to some extent bifurcated, raises questions about the nature and scale of the innovation which has occurred.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信