现代多边官僚制:国际行政法在国际组织中的作用?

P. Quayle
{"title":"现代多边官僚制:国际行政法在国际组织中的作用?","authors":"P. Quayle","doi":"10.1163/9789004441033_002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What is the role of ‘international administrative law’—the law of employment relations—at international organizations? This chapter begins by contrasting the international legal status of States on the one hand, and international organizations on the other, before noting that the bureaucracies of the latter are heir to the traditions and identity of the former. It is then argued that transposing modern bureaucracy— ideally, meritocractic and impersonal national civil services—to multilateral administration, replaces the ‘patrimonial’ pressures on modern States with the related risks of ‘State sociability’ and co-option of international organizations. We then review the several legal bases of international administrative tribunals to discern whether international administrative law takes into account this strain. This chapter draws the conclusion that international administrative law is inherent to the assumption by multilateral administration of the ideals of modern bureaucracy— impartial, efficient and energetic—and so synonymous with the independent existence of international organizations.","PeriodicalId":164763,"journal":{"name":"The Role of International Administrative Law at International Organizations","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Modern Multilateral Bureaucracy: What is the Role of International Administrative Law at International Organizations?\",\"authors\":\"P. Quayle\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004441033_002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What is the role of ‘international administrative law’—the law of employment relations—at international organizations? This chapter begins by contrasting the international legal status of States on the one hand, and international organizations on the other, before noting that the bureaucracies of the latter are heir to the traditions and identity of the former. It is then argued that transposing modern bureaucracy— ideally, meritocractic and impersonal national civil services—to multilateral administration, replaces the ‘patrimonial’ pressures on modern States with the related risks of ‘State sociability’ and co-option of international organizations. We then review the several legal bases of international administrative tribunals to discern whether international administrative law takes into account this strain. This chapter draws the conclusion that international administrative law is inherent to the assumption by multilateral administration of the ideals of modern bureaucracy— impartial, efficient and energetic—and so synonymous with the independent existence of international organizations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Role of International Administrative Law at International Organizations\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Role of International Administrative Law at International Organizations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004441033_002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Role of International Administrative Law at International Organizations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004441033_002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“国际行政法”——雇佣关系法——在国际组织中的作用是什么?本章首先比较了一方面是国家和国际组织的国际法律地位,然后指出后者的官僚机构继承了前者的传统和特性。然后认为,将现代官僚制度- -理想情况下是任人唯贤和非个人的国家公务员制度- -转变为多边行政管理,以“国家社交性”和国际组织的合作选择的相关风险取代了现代国家的“世袭”压力。然后,我们审查国际行政法庭的几个法律依据,以辨别国际行政法是否考虑到这种压力。本章得出的结论是,国际行政法是多边行政对现代官僚主义理想的假设所固有的- -公正、有效和充满活力- -因此与国际组织的独立存在同义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Modern Multilateral Bureaucracy: What is the Role of International Administrative Law at International Organizations?
What is the role of ‘international administrative law’—the law of employment relations—at international organizations? This chapter begins by contrasting the international legal status of States on the one hand, and international organizations on the other, before noting that the bureaucracies of the latter are heir to the traditions and identity of the former. It is then argued that transposing modern bureaucracy— ideally, meritocractic and impersonal national civil services—to multilateral administration, replaces the ‘patrimonial’ pressures on modern States with the related risks of ‘State sociability’ and co-option of international organizations. We then review the several legal bases of international administrative tribunals to discern whether international administrative law takes into account this strain. This chapter draws the conclusion that international administrative law is inherent to the assumption by multilateral administration of the ideals of modern bureaucracy— impartial, efficient and energetic—and so synonymous with the independent existence of international organizations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信