自由贸易法的四个法案的意义

Jean-Sylvestre Bergé
{"title":"自由贸易法的四个法案的意义","authors":"Jean-Sylvestre Bergé","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3459927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Free trade law can be approached in its contemporary form through the multilateral scene provided by the WTO or bilateral agreements, such as the recent CETA. These different conventional and institutional frameworks are intended to promote and secure international trade. Their purpose is therefore no stranger to the exercise of economic freedom of movement, even if these structures remain strongly contrasted in their substance and the ways of exercising them differ on a global scale. \n \nWhat exactly these freedoms mean is potentially a concern for everyone. The ordinary citizen, the political or economic leader, the investor, the intellectual, the state, the intergovernmental organization, regional integration, the non-governmental organization, may all wonder about the direction and objectives set out in these free trade mechanisms. \n \nThe question I would like to address here is how the legal expert is able (or not) to grasp this search for meaning. What options are open to lawyers in an attempt to make their way through this eminently philosophical questioning? \n \nThis paper proposes a progressive answer in “four acts\": Neoliberal unconsciousness (I), Fundamental and hypothetical standard (II), The space of flows (III), Ecological Conscience (IV).","PeriodicalId":103245,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Trade Law (Topic)","volume":"53 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Meaning of Free Trade Law in Four Acts\",\"authors\":\"Jean-Sylvestre Bergé\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3459927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Free trade law can be approached in its contemporary form through the multilateral scene provided by the WTO or bilateral agreements, such as the recent CETA. These different conventional and institutional frameworks are intended to promote and secure international trade. Their purpose is therefore no stranger to the exercise of economic freedom of movement, even if these structures remain strongly contrasted in their substance and the ways of exercising them differ on a global scale. \\n \\nWhat exactly these freedoms mean is potentially a concern for everyone. The ordinary citizen, the political or economic leader, the investor, the intellectual, the state, the intergovernmental organization, regional integration, the non-governmental organization, may all wonder about the direction and objectives set out in these free trade mechanisms. \\n \\nThe question I would like to address here is how the legal expert is able (or not) to grasp this search for meaning. What options are open to lawyers in an attempt to make their way through this eminently philosophical questioning? \\n \\nThis paper proposes a progressive answer in “four acts\\\": Neoliberal unconsciousness (I), Fundamental and hypothetical standard (II), The space of flows (III), Ecological Conscience (IV).\",\"PeriodicalId\":103245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Trade Law (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"53 7\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Trade Law (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3459927\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Trade Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3459927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自由贸易法律可以通过世贸组织提供的多边场景或双边协议,例如最近的CETA,以其当代形式进行处理。这些不同的传统和体制框架旨在促进和保障国际贸易。因此,它们的目的与行使经济行动自由并不陌生,即使这些结构在其实质和行使它们的方式在全球范围内仍然存在强烈的对比。这些自由究竟意味着什么,可能是每个人都关心的问题。普通公民、政治或经济领袖、投资者、知识分子、国家、政府间组织、区域一体化、非政府组织,可能都想知道这些自由贸易机制所规定的方向和目标。我想在这里讨论的问题是,法律专家如何能够(或不能够)把握这种对意义的探索。律师们有哪些选择,可以让他们试图通过这个显著的哲学问题?本文提出了一个进步的答案,分为“四幕”:新自由主义无意识(I)、基本和假设的标准(II)、流动的空间(III)、生态良知(IV)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Meaning of Free Trade Law in Four Acts
Free trade law can be approached in its contemporary form through the multilateral scene provided by the WTO or bilateral agreements, such as the recent CETA. These different conventional and institutional frameworks are intended to promote and secure international trade. Their purpose is therefore no stranger to the exercise of economic freedom of movement, even if these structures remain strongly contrasted in their substance and the ways of exercising them differ on a global scale. What exactly these freedoms mean is potentially a concern for everyone. The ordinary citizen, the political or economic leader, the investor, the intellectual, the state, the intergovernmental organization, regional integration, the non-governmental organization, may all wonder about the direction and objectives set out in these free trade mechanisms. The question I would like to address here is how the legal expert is able (or not) to grasp this search for meaning. What options are open to lawyers in an attempt to make their way through this eminently philosophical questioning? This paper proposes a progressive answer in “four acts": Neoliberal unconsciousness (I), Fundamental and hypothetical standard (II), The space of flows (III), Ecological Conscience (IV).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信