处理不平衡数据的信用卡欺诈检测

Istiak Ahmed Mondal, Md. Enamul Haque, Al-Maruf Hassan, Swakkhar Shatabda
{"title":"处理不平衡数据的信用卡欺诈检测","authors":"Istiak Ahmed Mondal, Md. Enamul Haque, Al-Maruf Hassan, Swakkhar Shatabda","doi":"10.1109/ICCIT54785.2021.9689866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the rising trend in online transactions, the threat of financial fraud is also rising. This makes the necessity for an effective Fraud Detection System (FDS) more than ever before. To develop such a system the financial institutes are moving towards machine learning-based approaches due to their effectiveness. Machine learning-based systems need historical data to learn. As fraud cases take place rarely, the number of positive labeled classes in financial fraud datasets are very small and the datasets remain imbalanced. For this, the possibility for machine learning-based FDS to produce misleading results is high. To counter this problem Machine Learning (ML) researchers use multiple solutions from the perspective of data-level approach, algorithm-level approach, feature engineering, ensemble models, or any combination of them. In this paper, we propose to use Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) based synthetic data generation to handle the data imbalance problem followed by an ensemble classifier for classification. We have used a standard benchmark dataset of credit card fraud data. In our experiments, we have used both traditional oversampling/undersampling and GAN-based techniques from the data-level approach and investigated their effectiveness using ML algorithms and ensemble models. We have found Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) to be more effective and stable in performance compared to traditional oversampling techniques for both ML and ensemble models. Experiments also suggest that the combination of GAN-based sampling and ensemble models provides the best results. We also have found Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) to provide more stable results compared to Adaptive Synthetic Sample (ADASYN) from the traditional oversampling technique.","PeriodicalId":166450,"journal":{"name":"2021 24th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT)","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Handling Imbalanced Data for Credit Card Fraud Detection\",\"authors\":\"Istiak Ahmed Mondal, Md. Enamul Haque, Al-Maruf Hassan, Swakkhar Shatabda\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCIT54785.2021.9689866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the rising trend in online transactions, the threat of financial fraud is also rising. This makes the necessity for an effective Fraud Detection System (FDS) more than ever before. To develop such a system the financial institutes are moving towards machine learning-based approaches due to their effectiveness. Machine learning-based systems need historical data to learn. As fraud cases take place rarely, the number of positive labeled classes in financial fraud datasets are very small and the datasets remain imbalanced. For this, the possibility for machine learning-based FDS to produce misleading results is high. To counter this problem Machine Learning (ML) researchers use multiple solutions from the perspective of data-level approach, algorithm-level approach, feature engineering, ensemble models, or any combination of them. In this paper, we propose to use Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) based synthetic data generation to handle the data imbalance problem followed by an ensemble classifier for classification. We have used a standard benchmark dataset of credit card fraud data. In our experiments, we have used both traditional oversampling/undersampling and GAN-based techniques from the data-level approach and investigated their effectiveness using ML algorithms and ensemble models. We have found Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) to be more effective and stable in performance compared to traditional oversampling techniques for both ML and ensemble models. Experiments also suggest that the combination of GAN-based sampling and ensemble models provides the best results. We also have found Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) to provide more stable results compared to Adaptive Synthetic Sample (ADASYN) from the traditional oversampling technique.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 24th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT)\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 24th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIT54785.2021.9689866\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 24th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIT54785.2021.9689866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

随着网上交易的增长趋势,金融诈骗的威胁也在上升。这使得一个有效的欺诈检测系统(FDS)比以往任何时候都更加必要。为了开发这样一个系统,由于其有效性,金融机构正在转向基于机器学习的方法。基于机器学习的系统需要历史数据来学习。由于欺诈案件很少发生,金融欺诈数据集中正标记类的数量非常少,数据集仍然不平衡。因此,基于机器学习的FDS产生误导性结果的可能性很高。为了解决这个问题,机器学习(ML)研究人员从数据级方法、算法级方法、特征工程、集成模型或它们的任何组合的角度使用多种解决方案。在本文中,我们提出使用基于生成对抗网络(GAN)的合成数据生成来处理数据不平衡问题,然后使用集成分类器进行分类。我们使用了信用卡欺诈数据的标准基准数据集。在我们的实验中,我们使用了传统的过采样/欠采样和基于gan的数据级方法,并使用ML算法和集成模型研究了它们的有效性。我们发现生成对抗网络(GAN)在性能上比传统的ML和集成模型的过采样技术更有效和稳定。实验还表明,基于gan的采样和集成模型相结合可以获得最好的结果。我们还发现,与传统过采样技术的自适应合成样本(ADASYN)相比,合成少数派过采样技术(SMOTE)提供了更稳定的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Handling Imbalanced Data for Credit Card Fraud Detection
With the rising trend in online transactions, the threat of financial fraud is also rising. This makes the necessity for an effective Fraud Detection System (FDS) more than ever before. To develop such a system the financial institutes are moving towards machine learning-based approaches due to their effectiveness. Machine learning-based systems need historical data to learn. As fraud cases take place rarely, the number of positive labeled classes in financial fraud datasets are very small and the datasets remain imbalanced. For this, the possibility for machine learning-based FDS to produce misleading results is high. To counter this problem Machine Learning (ML) researchers use multiple solutions from the perspective of data-level approach, algorithm-level approach, feature engineering, ensemble models, or any combination of them. In this paper, we propose to use Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) based synthetic data generation to handle the data imbalance problem followed by an ensemble classifier for classification. We have used a standard benchmark dataset of credit card fraud data. In our experiments, we have used both traditional oversampling/undersampling and GAN-based techniques from the data-level approach and investigated their effectiveness using ML algorithms and ensemble models. We have found Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) to be more effective and stable in performance compared to traditional oversampling techniques for both ML and ensemble models. Experiments also suggest that the combination of GAN-based sampling and ensemble models provides the best results. We also have found Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) to provide more stable results compared to Adaptive Synthetic Sample (ADASYN) from the traditional oversampling technique.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信