脑电参数预测不同阶段麻醉深度的临床分析:比较研究。

N. Arefian, A. Zali, A. Seddighi, M. Fathi, Houman Teymourian, S. Dabir, B. Radpay
{"title":"脑电参数预测不同阶段麻醉深度的临床分析:比较研究。","authors":"N. Arefian, A. Zali, A. Seddighi, M. Fathi, Houman Teymourian, S. Dabir, B. Radpay","doi":"10.5580/18fa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Evaluation of depth of anesthesia is especially important in adequate and efficient management of patients. Clinical assessment of EEG in the operating room is one of the major difficulties in this field. This study aims to find the most valuable EEG parameters in prediction of the depth of anesthesia in different stages. Materials and Methods: EEG data of 30 patients with same anesthesia protocol (total intravenous anesthesia) were recorded in all anesthetic stages in Shohada-e-Tajrish Hospital. Quantitative EEG characteristics are classified into 4 categories of time, frequency, bispectral and entropy-based characteristics. Their sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in determination of depth of anesthesia were yielded by comparing them with the recorded reference signals in awake, light anesthesia, deep anesthesia and brain dead patients. Results: Time parameters had low accuracy in prediction of the depth of anesthesia. The accuracy rate was 75% for burst suppression response. This value was higher for frequency- based characteristics and the best results were obtained in s spectral power (accuracy: 88.9%). The accuracy rate was 89.9% for synch fast slow bispectral characteristics. The best results were obtained from entropy-based characteristics with the accuracy of 99.8%. Conclusion: Analysis of the entropy-based characteristics had a great value in predicting the depth of anesthesia. Generally, due to the low accuracy of each single parameter in prediction of the depth of anesthesia, we recommend multiple characteristics analysis with greater focus on entropy-based characteristics. (Tanaffos 2009; 8(2): 46-53)","PeriodicalId":261568,"journal":{"name":"Tanaffos: Journal of Respiratory Disease, Thoracic Surgery, Intensive Care and Tuberculosis","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical analysis of EEG parameters in prediction of the depth of anesthesia in different stages: a comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"N. Arefian, A. Zali, A. Seddighi, M. Fathi, Houman Teymourian, S. Dabir, B. Radpay\",\"doi\":\"10.5580/18fa\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Evaluation of depth of anesthesia is especially important in adequate and efficient management of patients. Clinical assessment of EEG in the operating room is one of the major difficulties in this field. This study aims to find the most valuable EEG parameters in prediction of the depth of anesthesia in different stages. Materials and Methods: EEG data of 30 patients with same anesthesia protocol (total intravenous anesthesia) were recorded in all anesthetic stages in Shohada-e-Tajrish Hospital. Quantitative EEG characteristics are classified into 4 categories of time, frequency, bispectral and entropy-based characteristics. Their sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in determination of depth of anesthesia were yielded by comparing them with the recorded reference signals in awake, light anesthesia, deep anesthesia and brain dead patients. Results: Time parameters had low accuracy in prediction of the depth of anesthesia. The accuracy rate was 75% for burst suppression response. This value was higher for frequency- based characteristics and the best results were obtained in s spectral power (accuracy: 88.9%). The accuracy rate was 89.9% for synch fast slow bispectral characteristics. The best results were obtained from entropy-based characteristics with the accuracy of 99.8%. Conclusion: Analysis of the entropy-based characteristics had a great value in predicting the depth of anesthesia. Generally, due to the low accuracy of each single parameter in prediction of the depth of anesthesia, we recommend multiple characteristics analysis with greater focus on entropy-based characteristics. (Tanaffos 2009; 8(2): 46-53)\",\"PeriodicalId\":261568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tanaffos: Journal of Respiratory Disease, Thoracic Surgery, Intensive Care and Tuberculosis\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tanaffos: Journal of Respiratory Disease, Thoracic Surgery, Intensive Care and Tuberculosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5580/18fa\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanaffos: Journal of Respiratory Disease, Thoracic Surgery, Intensive Care and Tuberculosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/18fa","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

背景:麻醉深度的评估对患者的充分和有效的管理尤为重要。手术室脑电图的临床评估是该领域的主要难点之一。本研究旨在寻找在不同阶段预测麻醉深度最有价值的脑电参数。材料与方法:记录Shohada-e-Tajrish医院采用相同麻醉方案(全静脉麻醉)的30例患者在麻醉各阶段的脑电图资料。定量脑电特征分为基于时间、频率、双谱和熵的4类特征。将其与清醒、浅麻醉、深麻醉和脑死亡患者记录的参考信号进行比较,得出其判断麻醉深度的灵敏度、特异性和准确性。结果:时间参数对麻醉深度的预测准确度较低。对突发抑制反应的准确率为75%。该值对于基于频率的特征较高,并且在s谱功率下获得最佳结果(精度为88.9%)。对同步快慢双谱特征的准确率为89.9%。以熵为基础的特征提取结果最好,准确率为99.8%。结论:基于熵的特征分析对预测麻醉深度有重要价值。通常,由于预测麻醉深度时单个参数的准确性较低,我们建议对基于熵的特征进行多特征分析。(Tanaffos 2009;8 (2): 46-53)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical analysis of EEG parameters in prediction of the depth of anesthesia in different stages: a comparative study.
Background: Evaluation of depth of anesthesia is especially important in adequate and efficient management of patients. Clinical assessment of EEG in the operating room is one of the major difficulties in this field. This study aims to find the most valuable EEG parameters in prediction of the depth of anesthesia in different stages. Materials and Methods: EEG data of 30 patients with same anesthesia protocol (total intravenous anesthesia) were recorded in all anesthetic stages in Shohada-e-Tajrish Hospital. Quantitative EEG characteristics are classified into 4 categories of time, frequency, bispectral and entropy-based characteristics. Their sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in determination of depth of anesthesia were yielded by comparing them with the recorded reference signals in awake, light anesthesia, deep anesthesia and brain dead patients. Results: Time parameters had low accuracy in prediction of the depth of anesthesia. The accuracy rate was 75% for burst suppression response. This value was higher for frequency- based characteristics and the best results were obtained in s spectral power (accuracy: 88.9%). The accuracy rate was 89.9% for synch fast slow bispectral characteristics. The best results were obtained from entropy-based characteristics with the accuracy of 99.8%. Conclusion: Analysis of the entropy-based characteristics had a great value in predicting the depth of anesthesia. Generally, due to the low accuracy of each single parameter in prediction of the depth of anesthesia, we recommend multiple characteristics analysis with greater focus on entropy-based characteristics. (Tanaffos 2009; 8(2): 46-53)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信