在斩波脉冲变压器测量中使用的比较算法的评价

J. Joskowicz, G. Slomovitz, D. Slomovitz
{"title":"在斩波脉冲变压器测量中使用的比较算法的评价","authors":"J. Joskowicz, G. Slomovitz, D. Slomovitz","doi":"10.1109/I2MTC.2014.6860721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes evaluation parameters for comparing the closeness between full level and reduced level waveforms in impulse test of power transformers. As lighting impulse tests with chopped waveforms generally have differences in the chopping time, a simple direct comparison could lead to erroneous conclusions, and transformers that pass the test can be judged as failure. The proposal is applied to estimate the quality of different comparing algorithms using real test results.","PeriodicalId":331484,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC) Proceedings","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of comparing algorithms used in chopped impulse transformer measurements\",\"authors\":\"J. Joskowicz, G. Slomovitz, D. Slomovitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/I2MTC.2014.6860721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper proposes evaluation parameters for comparing the closeness between full level and reduced level waveforms in impulse test of power transformers. As lighting impulse tests with chopped waveforms generally have differences in the chopping time, a simple direct comparison could lead to erroneous conclusions, and transformers that pass the test can be judged as failure. The proposal is applied to estimate the quality of different comparing algorithms using real test results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC) Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC) Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/I2MTC.2014.6860721\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC) Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/I2MTC.2014.6860721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

提出了电力变压器冲击试验中满电平波形与降电平波形紧密度比较的评价参数。由于斩波波形的雷电冲击试验通常在斩波时间上存在差异,简单的直接比较可能导致错误的结论,通过试验的变压器可判定为故障。并利用实际测试结果对不同比较算法的质量进行了估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of comparing algorithms used in chopped impulse transformer measurements
This paper proposes evaluation parameters for comparing the closeness between full level and reduced level waveforms in impulse test of power transformers. As lighting impulse tests with chopped waveforms generally have differences in the chopping time, a simple direct comparison could lead to erroneous conclusions, and transformers that pass the test can be judged as failure. The proposal is applied to estimate the quality of different comparing algorithms using real test results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信