{"title":"作为协议约束的差分隐私","authors":"Ilya Mironov","doi":"10.1109/ITW.2012.6404769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Differential privacy, introduced in 2006, has become a standard definition of privacy for statistical computations. Most of the research on differential privacy has explored questions arising in the client-server setting, where privacy guarantees are one-sided and cover data held by just one of the protocol participants. We observe that differential privacy complements the classic definition of secure multi-party computations by allowing one to quantify information leaked through the output of the computation. This view leads to a number of interesting questions, where differential privacy is treated as a constraint on the protocol. We survey the state-of-the-art of differential privacy in a multi-party setting and formulate several open problems.","PeriodicalId":325771,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE Information Theory Workshop","volume":"205 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential privacy as a protocol constraint\",\"authors\":\"Ilya Mironov\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ITW.2012.6404769\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Differential privacy, introduced in 2006, has become a standard definition of privacy for statistical computations. Most of the research on differential privacy has explored questions arising in the client-server setting, where privacy guarantees are one-sided and cover data held by just one of the protocol participants. We observe that differential privacy complements the classic definition of secure multi-party computations by allowing one to quantify information leaked through the output of the computation. This view leads to a number of interesting questions, where differential privacy is treated as a constraint on the protocol. We survey the state-of-the-art of differential privacy in a multi-party setting and formulate several open problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 IEEE Information Theory Workshop\",\"volume\":\"205 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 IEEE Information Theory Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITW.2012.6404769\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE Information Theory Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITW.2012.6404769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Differential privacy, introduced in 2006, has become a standard definition of privacy for statistical computations. Most of the research on differential privacy has explored questions arising in the client-server setting, where privacy guarantees are one-sided and cover data held by just one of the protocol participants. We observe that differential privacy complements the classic definition of secure multi-party computations by allowing one to quantify information leaked through the output of the computation. This view leads to a number of interesting questions, where differential privacy is treated as a constraint on the protocol. We survey the state-of-the-art of differential privacy in a multi-party setting and formulate several open problems.