论欧根·埃利希法律理论对宪法的重要性

M. Maliska
{"title":"论欧根·埃利希法律理论对宪法的重要性","authors":"M. Maliska","doi":"10.31861/EHRLICHSJOURNAL2018.02.043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". The Ehrlichian concepts of \"living law\" and \"association\" can help constitutional law in the investigation of the relationship between constitution and pluralism. When Ehrlich describes the forces of society, which produce through their various associations a living law, he shows constitutional law the importance of law existing outside the State Law. The Constitution does not only regulate the State, but it also contains norms for society. Fundamental rights are binding standards for both the state and civil society. Thus, the current concept of Constitution makes the validity of law no longer in State law, but in the Constitution. In this way, the existence of a living law produced by the social associations finds its validity in the Constitution. The relation between constitutional law and sociology of law has in Ehrlich's work one of the most significant elements of connection. The opening of the Constitution to pluralism is not only a process that begins and ends in the interpretation of the constitutional text. Openness to pluralism implies the recognition of a law that exists in practice and moves society. Constitutional interpretation must be attentive to this law. The constitutional validity of the law brings the necessary limits that a sociological analysis of law often fails to observe. The pluralistic societies of the 21st century recognize the insufficiency of the legislated law as the sole and exclusive form of social regulation. New legal forms emerge and need to be contemplated by a theory of law open to the pluralism of legal sources.","PeriodicalId":191182,"journal":{"name":"Erlìhìvsʹkij žurnal","volume":"2019 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Importance of Eugen Ehrlich's Theory of Law for Constitutional Law\",\"authors\":\"M. Maliska\",\"doi\":\"10.31861/EHRLICHSJOURNAL2018.02.043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". The Ehrlichian concepts of \\\"living law\\\" and \\\"association\\\" can help constitutional law in the investigation of the relationship between constitution and pluralism. When Ehrlich describes the forces of society, which produce through their various associations a living law, he shows constitutional law the importance of law existing outside the State Law. The Constitution does not only regulate the State, but it also contains norms for society. Fundamental rights are binding standards for both the state and civil society. Thus, the current concept of Constitution makes the validity of law no longer in State law, but in the Constitution. In this way, the existence of a living law produced by the social associations finds its validity in the Constitution. The relation between constitutional law and sociology of law has in Ehrlich's work one of the most significant elements of connection. The opening of the Constitution to pluralism is not only a process that begins and ends in the interpretation of the constitutional text. Openness to pluralism implies the recognition of a law that exists in practice and moves society. Constitutional interpretation must be attentive to this law. The constitutional validity of the law brings the necessary limits that a sociological analysis of law often fails to observe. The pluralistic societies of the 21st century recognize the insufficiency of the legislated law as the sole and exclusive form of social regulation. New legal forms emerge and need to be contemplated by a theory of law open to the pluralism of legal sources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":191182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Erlìhìvsʹkij žurnal\",\"volume\":\"2019 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Erlìhìvsʹkij žurnal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31861/EHRLICHSJOURNAL2018.02.043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Erlìhìvsʹkij žurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31861/EHRLICHSJOURNAL2018.02.043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

。埃利希式的“活法”和“关联”概念可以帮助宪法学研究宪法与多元主义的关系。当埃利希描述通过各种联系产生活的法律的社会力量时,他向宪法表明了存在于国家法之外的法律的重要性。宪法不仅规范国家,也包含社会规范。基本权利对国家和公民社会都是具有约束力的标准。因此,现行的宪法概念使法律的效力不再是在州法中,而是在宪法中。这样,由社会团体所产生的活生生的法律的存在,在宪法中找到了它的效力。在埃利希的著作中,宪法学与法社会学之间的关系是最重要的联系因素之一。宪法向多元主义开放的过程不仅始于对宪法文本的解释,也结束于对宪法文本的解释。对多元主义的开放意味着承认一种存在于实践中并推动社会的法律。宪法解释必须注意这一法律。法律的宪法效力带来了法律的社会学分析常常无法观察到的必要限制。21世纪的多元社会认识到立法作为社会调节的唯一和排他性形式的不足。新的法律形式出现了,需要一种对法律来源多元化开放的法律理论加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Importance of Eugen Ehrlich's Theory of Law for Constitutional Law
. The Ehrlichian concepts of "living law" and "association" can help constitutional law in the investigation of the relationship between constitution and pluralism. When Ehrlich describes the forces of society, which produce through their various associations a living law, he shows constitutional law the importance of law existing outside the State Law. The Constitution does not only regulate the State, but it also contains norms for society. Fundamental rights are binding standards for both the state and civil society. Thus, the current concept of Constitution makes the validity of law no longer in State law, but in the Constitution. In this way, the existence of a living law produced by the social associations finds its validity in the Constitution. The relation between constitutional law and sociology of law has in Ehrlich's work one of the most significant elements of connection. The opening of the Constitution to pluralism is not only a process that begins and ends in the interpretation of the constitutional text. Openness to pluralism implies the recognition of a law that exists in practice and moves society. Constitutional interpretation must be attentive to this law. The constitutional validity of the law brings the necessary limits that a sociological analysis of law often fails to observe. The pluralistic societies of the 21st century recognize the insufficiency of the legislated law as the sole and exclusive form of social regulation. New legal forms emerge and need to be contemplated by a theory of law open to the pluralism of legal sources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信