空间插值方法的比较

Cheng Guodong Lu Ling Li Xin
{"title":"空间插值方法的比较","authors":"Cheng Guodong Lu Ling Li Xin","doi":"10.11867/J.ISSN.1001-8166.2000.03.0260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spatial interpolation can be classified in accordance with their basic hypotheses and mathematical natures as: geometric method, statistical method, geostatistical method, stochastic simulation method, physical model simulation method and combined method. The application areas, special algorithm, advantages and disadvantages of each interpolation method are introduced and compared in the paper. The comparison shows that there is no absolutely optimal spatial interpolation method; there is only relatively optimal interpolation method in special situation. Hence, the best spatial interpolation method should be selected in accordance with the qualitative analysis of the data, exploratory spatial data analysis and repeated experiments. In addition, the result of spatial interpolation should be strictly examined for its validity. Development of general software for spatial interpolation and strengthening the basic theory research are key issues in the future.","PeriodicalId":415150,"journal":{"name":"Advance in Earth Sciences","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"93","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARISON OF SPATIAL INTERPOLATION METHODS\",\"authors\":\"Cheng Guodong Lu Ling Li Xin\",\"doi\":\"10.11867/J.ISSN.1001-8166.2000.03.0260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Spatial interpolation can be classified in accordance with their basic hypotheses and mathematical natures as: geometric method, statistical method, geostatistical method, stochastic simulation method, physical model simulation method and combined method. The application areas, special algorithm, advantages and disadvantages of each interpolation method are introduced and compared in the paper. The comparison shows that there is no absolutely optimal spatial interpolation method; there is only relatively optimal interpolation method in special situation. Hence, the best spatial interpolation method should be selected in accordance with the qualitative analysis of the data, exploratory spatial data analysis and repeated experiments. In addition, the result of spatial interpolation should be strictly examined for its validity. Development of general software for spatial interpolation and strengthening the basic theory research are key issues in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":415150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advance in Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"93\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advance in Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11867/J.ISSN.1001-8166.2000.03.0260\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advance in Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11867/J.ISSN.1001-8166.2000.03.0260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 93

摘要

空间插值按照其基本假设和数学性质可分为:几何方法、统计学方法、地统计学方法、随机模拟方法、物理模型模拟方法和组合方法。本文介绍并比较了各种插值方法的应用领域、专用算法、优缺点。对比表明,不存在绝对最优的空间插值方法;在特殊情况下,只有相对最优的插值方法。因此,根据数据的定性分析、探索性空间数据分析和反复实验,选择最佳的空间插值方法。此外,对空间插值结果的有效性也要进行严格的检验。开发通用的空间插值软件,加强基础理论研究是今后空间插值研究的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COMPARISON OF SPATIAL INTERPOLATION METHODS
Spatial interpolation can be classified in accordance with their basic hypotheses and mathematical natures as: geometric method, statistical method, geostatistical method, stochastic simulation method, physical model simulation method and combined method. The application areas, special algorithm, advantages and disadvantages of each interpolation method are introduced and compared in the paper. The comparison shows that there is no absolutely optimal spatial interpolation method; there is only relatively optimal interpolation method in special situation. Hence, the best spatial interpolation method should be selected in accordance with the qualitative analysis of the data, exploratory spatial data analysis and repeated experiments. In addition, the result of spatial interpolation should be strictly examined for its validity. Development of general software for spatial interpolation and strengthening the basic theory research are key issues in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信