2017年埃塞俄比亚北部提格雷地区迈克勒市公立医院护士和医生的跨专业合作及相关因素

Teklit Eukubay, Abebe Abate
{"title":"2017年埃塞俄比亚北部提格雷地区迈克勒市公立医院护士和医生的跨专业合作及相关因素","authors":"Teklit Eukubay, Abebe Abate","doi":"10.15406/ncoaj.2019.06.00206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Inter professional collaboration is necessary to ensure that health care teams are efficient and able to provide collaboration, and joint decision making between the client and the health care teams in all areas of treatment planning and caring clients with the highest quality of care, in order to reach a determined goal, regardless of the health care settings. Objective: To assess inter-professional collaboration and associated factors among nurses and physicians working in public hospitals at Mekelle town Tigray Northern Ethiopia 2017. Method: Institution based of quantitative cross sectional study design was conducted among 409 study participants were selected by simple random sampling techniques from all public hospitals of Mekelle city. The data were presented in the form of text, frequencies, tables and figures Logistic regression was used to test association between dependent and independent variables. All variables with P value≤0.25 were including in multivariable analysis and magnitude of association measured by using odds ratio at 95% confidence interval and statistically significant at p-value less than 0.05 was considered statically significant. Result: This study indicates that more than half 222(54.3%) respondents were shows frequent collaborations. The determinants factors showed that unfavorable attitude of shared education and teamwork statistically significant associated 2.53 times higher for infrequent collaboration among those who has favorable attitude (AOR 2.53, 95% CI (1.44-4.45). Poor Communication showed associated 3.73 times higher for infrequent collaboration compared with respondents has good communication (AOR, 3.73, 95% CI (2.30-6.05).Similarly dissatisfied by organizational supports showed significant associated 2.94 times for infrequent collaboration which compared with respondents satisfied by organizational support (AOR 2.94 at 95% CI (1.83-4.73). Conclusion: The finding of this study was reasonably good and this was caused by jointly collaborated professional activities but still it needs improvements. Organizational supports of professional growth, motivations and recognitions, taking responsibility, early conflict managements were pertinent factors to increase professional satisfaction, mutual understanding and collaborative practice.","PeriodicalId":437508,"journal":{"name":"Nursing & Care Open Access Journal","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interprofessional collaboration and associated factors among nurses and physicians working at public hospitals in Mekelle city tigray region, north Ethiopia, 2017\",\"authors\":\"Teklit Eukubay, Abebe Abate\",\"doi\":\"10.15406/ncoaj.2019.06.00206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Inter professional collaboration is necessary to ensure that health care teams are efficient and able to provide collaboration, and joint decision making between the client and the health care teams in all areas of treatment planning and caring clients with the highest quality of care, in order to reach a determined goal, regardless of the health care settings. Objective: To assess inter-professional collaboration and associated factors among nurses and physicians working in public hospitals at Mekelle town Tigray Northern Ethiopia 2017. Method: Institution based of quantitative cross sectional study design was conducted among 409 study participants were selected by simple random sampling techniques from all public hospitals of Mekelle city. The data were presented in the form of text, frequencies, tables and figures Logistic regression was used to test association between dependent and independent variables. All variables with P value≤0.25 were including in multivariable analysis and magnitude of association measured by using odds ratio at 95% confidence interval and statistically significant at p-value less than 0.05 was considered statically significant. Result: This study indicates that more than half 222(54.3%) respondents were shows frequent collaborations. The determinants factors showed that unfavorable attitude of shared education and teamwork statistically significant associated 2.53 times higher for infrequent collaboration among those who has favorable attitude (AOR 2.53, 95% CI (1.44-4.45). Poor Communication showed associated 3.73 times higher for infrequent collaboration compared with respondents has good communication (AOR, 3.73, 95% CI (2.30-6.05).Similarly dissatisfied by organizational supports showed significant associated 2.94 times for infrequent collaboration which compared with respondents satisfied by organizational support (AOR 2.94 at 95% CI (1.83-4.73). Conclusion: The finding of this study was reasonably good and this was caused by jointly collaborated professional activities but still it needs improvements. Organizational supports of professional growth, motivations and recognitions, taking responsibility, early conflict managements were pertinent factors to increase professional satisfaction, mutual understanding and collaborative practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":437508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing & Care Open Access Journal\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing & Care Open Access Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15406/ncoaj.2019.06.00206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing & Care Open Access Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/ncoaj.2019.06.00206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:跨专业协作是必要的,以确保卫生保健团队是有效的,能够提供协作和共同决策的客户和卫生保健团队之间的所有领域的治疗计划和照顾客户的最高质量的护理,以达到一个确定的目标,无论卫生保健环境。目的:评估2017年埃塞俄比亚北部提格雷Mekelle镇公立医院护士和医生的跨专业协作及其相关因素。方法:采用基于机构的定量横断面研究设计,采用简单随机抽样的方法从梅克勒市所有公立医院抽取409名研究对象。数据以文本、频率、表格和图形的形式呈现,采用Logistic回归检验因变量和自变量之间的相关性。所有P值≤0.25的变量纳入多变量分析,使用比值比在95%置信区间测量关联程度,P值小于0.05具有统计学显著性,认为具有统计学显著性。结果:222名被调查者中有超过一半(54.3%)是频繁合作的。决定因素显示,对共享教育和团队合作持不利态度的学生,对不经常合作持积极态度的学生,其不良态度有统计学意义,相关系数为2.53倍(AOR为2.53,95% CI为1.44-4.45)。沟通不良的受访者与沟通良好的受访者相比,不频繁合作的受访者的沟通能力高3.73倍(AOR, 3.73, 95% CI(2.30-6.05))。同样,对组织支持不满意的受访者与对组织支持满意的受访者相比,对不频繁的合作表现出2.94倍的显著相关性(AOR为2.94,95% CI为1.83-4.73)。结论:本研究的结果是合理的,这是由共同合作的专业活动造成的,但仍需要改进。组织对专业成长的支持、动机和认可、承担责任、早期冲突管理是提高专业满意度、相互理解和协作实践的相关因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interprofessional collaboration and associated factors among nurses and physicians working at public hospitals in Mekelle city tigray region, north Ethiopia, 2017
Background: Inter professional collaboration is necessary to ensure that health care teams are efficient and able to provide collaboration, and joint decision making between the client and the health care teams in all areas of treatment planning and caring clients with the highest quality of care, in order to reach a determined goal, regardless of the health care settings. Objective: To assess inter-professional collaboration and associated factors among nurses and physicians working in public hospitals at Mekelle town Tigray Northern Ethiopia 2017. Method: Institution based of quantitative cross sectional study design was conducted among 409 study participants were selected by simple random sampling techniques from all public hospitals of Mekelle city. The data were presented in the form of text, frequencies, tables and figures Logistic regression was used to test association between dependent and independent variables. All variables with P value≤0.25 were including in multivariable analysis and magnitude of association measured by using odds ratio at 95% confidence interval and statistically significant at p-value less than 0.05 was considered statically significant. Result: This study indicates that more than half 222(54.3%) respondents were shows frequent collaborations. The determinants factors showed that unfavorable attitude of shared education and teamwork statistically significant associated 2.53 times higher for infrequent collaboration among those who has favorable attitude (AOR 2.53, 95% CI (1.44-4.45). Poor Communication showed associated 3.73 times higher for infrequent collaboration compared with respondents has good communication (AOR, 3.73, 95% CI (2.30-6.05).Similarly dissatisfied by organizational supports showed significant associated 2.94 times for infrequent collaboration which compared with respondents satisfied by organizational support (AOR 2.94 at 95% CI (1.83-4.73). Conclusion: The finding of this study was reasonably good and this was caused by jointly collaborated professional activities but still it needs improvements. Organizational supports of professional growth, motivations and recognitions, taking responsibility, early conflict managements were pertinent factors to increase professional satisfaction, mutual understanding and collaborative practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信