覆盖阵列:在不允许的组合存在的情况下评估覆盖范围和多样性

Joseph Morgan, R. Lekivetz, Tom Donnelly
{"title":"覆盖阵列:在不允许的组合存在的情况下评估覆盖范围和多样性","authors":"Joseph Morgan, R. Lekivetz, Tom Donnelly","doi":"10.1109/STC.2017.8234455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Test engineers are often faced with the challenge of selecting test cases that maximize the chance of discovering faults while working with a limited budget. Combinatorial testing is an effective test case selection strategy to address this challenge. The basic idea is to select test cases that ensure that all possible combinations of settings from two (or more) inputs are accounted for, regardless of which subset of two (or more) inputs are selected. Currently, combinatorial testing usually implies a covering array as the underlying mathematical construct. Yet, despite their demonstrated utility, practitioners sometimes encounter challenges that impede their use. For example, given a covering array with constraints on allowed combinations of settings for some subset of inputs, it is often unclear how to assess the coverage and diversity [2] properties of the resulting covering array.","PeriodicalId":303527,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 28th Annual Software Technology Conference (STC)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Covering arrays: Evaluating coverage and diversity in the presence of disallowed combinations\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Morgan, R. Lekivetz, Tom Donnelly\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/STC.2017.8234455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Test engineers are often faced with the challenge of selecting test cases that maximize the chance of discovering faults while working with a limited budget. Combinatorial testing is an effective test case selection strategy to address this challenge. The basic idea is to select test cases that ensure that all possible combinations of settings from two (or more) inputs are accounted for, regardless of which subset of two (or more) inputs are selected. Currently, combinatorial testing usually implies a covering array as the underlying mathematical construct. Yet, despite their demonstrated utility, practitioners sometimes encounter challenges that impede their use. For example, given a covering array with constraints on allowed combinations of settings for some subset of inputs, it is often unclear how to assess the coverage and diversity [2] properties of the resulting covering array.\",\"PeriodicalId\":303527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE 28th Annual Software Technology Conference (STC)\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE 28th Annual Software Technology Conference (STC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/STC.2017.8234455\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 28th Annual Software Technology Conference (STC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/STC.2017.8234455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

测试工程师经常面临这样的挑战:在有限的预算下,选择能够最大限度地发现错误的测试用例。组合测试是解决这一挑战的一种有效的测试用例选择策略。基本思想是选择测试用例,以确保考虑到来自两个(或更多)输入的所有可能的设置组合,而不管选择了两个(或更多)输入的哪个子集。目前,组合测试通常意味着一个覆盖数组作为底层的数学结构。然而,尽管它们证明了效用,但从业者有时会遇到阻碍其使用的挑战。例如,给定一个覆盖数组,对某些输入子集的允许设置组合进行限制,通常不清楚如何评估最终覆盖数组的覆盖率和多样性[2]属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Covering arrays: Evaluating coverage and diversity in the presence of disallowed combinations
Test engineers are often faced with the challenge of selecting test cases that maximize the chance of discovering faults while working with a limited budget. Combinatorial testing is an effective test case selection strategy to address this challenge. The basic idea is to select test cases that ensure that all possible combinations of settings from two (or more) inputs are accounted for, regardless of which subset of two (or more) inputs are selected. Currently, combinatorial testing usually implies a covering array as the underlying mathematical construct. Yet, despite their demonstrated utility, practitioners sometimes encounter challenges that impede their use. For example, given a covering array with constraints on allowed combinations of settings for some subset of inputs, it is often unclear how to assess the coverage and diversity [2] properties of the resulting covering array.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信