人工堤防材料的对比评价

Diaa Sheishah, G. Sipos, K. Barta, Enas Abdelsamei, Alexandru Hegyi, A. Onaca, A. M. Abbas
{"title":"人工堤防材料的对比评价","authors":"Diaa Sheishah, G. Sipos, K. Barta, Enas Abdelsamei, Alexandru Hegyi, A. Onaca, A. M. Abbas","doi":"10.14232/jengeo-2023-44452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial levees have major importance in protecting human lives\n and infrastructure as they are essential elements of the flood protection\n measures. Nevertheless, the lack of the necessary information about their\n structure and internal composition might cause high risks. To monitor their\n stability, integrated surveys are needed, including geophysical and\n geotechnical methods. Levees along the rivers in Hungary were constructed\n more than 150 years ago, and they were heightened several times; therefore,\n investigations are required to assure their performance in flood risk\n mitigation. Our investigation aimed to utilise non-invasive geophysical\n techniques, primarily electrical resistivity imaging, with the validation\n of geotechnical investigations to map and compare the compositional and\n structural variations of two very different levee sections along River\n Tisza and River Maros. Integrating the analysed drilling data with ERT\n profiles showed that the main composition of the investigated Tisza levee\n section is fine and medium silt with an average resistivity 30 Ωm, however,\n the investigated section of Maros levee was built of not only of fine and\n medium silt but also of medium and coarse sand exhibiting higher\n resistivity values reaching up to 2200 Ωm. Several physical parameters were\n measured to study the nature of constituting levee materials like moisture\n content, grain-size, porosity, bulk-density, saturated hydraulic\n conductivity, and resistivity. It was found that most of them show a\n connection with resistivity, but the hydraulic conductivity did not show a\n direct connection, however the latter could exhibit the aquitard nature of\n Tisza levee materials and the non-aquitard nature of Maros levee materials.","PeriodicalId":115431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Geography","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of the material of the artificial levees\",\"authors\":\"Diaa Sheishah, G. Sipos, K. Barta, Enas Abdelsamei, Alexandru Hegyi, A. Onaca, A. M. Abbas\",\"doi\":\"10.14232/jengeo-2023-44452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Artificial levees have major importance in protecting human lives\\n and infrastructure as they are essential elements of the flood protection\\n measures. Nevertheless, the lack of the necessary information about their\\n structure and internal composition might cause high risks. To monitor their\\n stability, integrated surveys are needed, including geophysical and\\n geotechnical methods. Levees along the rivers in Hungary were constructed\\n more than 150 years ago, and they were heightened several times; therefore,\\n investigations are required to assure their performance in flood risk\\n mitigation. Our investigation aimed to utilise non-invasive geophysical\\n techniques, primarily electrical resistivity imaging, with the validation\\n of geotechnical investigations to map and compare the compositional and\\n structural variations of two very different levee sections along River\\n Tisza and River Maros. Integrating the analysed drilling data with ERT\\n profiles showed that the main composition of the investigated Tisza levee\\n section is fine and medium silt with an average resistivity 30 Ωm, however,\\n the investigated section of Maros levee was built of not only of fine and\\n medium silt but also of medium and coarse sand exhibiting higher\\n resistivity values reaching up to 2200 Ωm. Several physical parameters were\\n measured to study the nature of constituting levee materials like moisture\\n content, grain-size, porosity, bulk-density, saturated hydraulic\\n conductivity, and resistivity. It was found that most of them show a\\n connection with resistivity, but the hydraulic conductivity did not show a\\n direct connection, however the latter could exhibit the aquitard nature of\\n Tisza levee materials and the non-aquitard nature of Maros levee materials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":115431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Geography\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14232/jengeo-2023-44452\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14232/jengeo-2023-44452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

人工堤防是防洪措施的重要组成部分,对保护人类生命和基础设施具有重要意义。然而,缺乏关于其结构和内部组成的必要信息可能会造成高风险。为了监测其稳定性,需要综合调查,包括地球物理和岩土工程方法。匈牙利沿河的防洪堤建于150多年前,并多次加高;因此,需要进行调查,以确保它们在减轻洪水风险方面的表现。我们的调查旨在利用非侵入性地球物理技术,主要是电阻率成像,并通过岩土工程调查的验证来绘制和比较沿Tisza河和Maros河两个非常不同的堤坝部分的成分和结构变化。结合分析的钻井资料和ERT剖面,发现Tisza堤防剖面的主要成分为细砂和中砂,平均电阻率为30 Ωm,而Maros堤防剖面不仅由细砂和中砂组成,而且由中砂和粗砂组成,其电阻率较高,最高可达2200 Ωm。研究人员测量了一些物理参数,以研究构成堤坝材料的性质,如含水量、粒度、孔隙率、体积密度、饱和水力导电性和电阻率。研究发现,它们大多与电阻率有关,但与导电性没有直接关系,而导电性可以表现出Tisza防洪堤材料的疏水性和Maros防洪堤材料的非疏水性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of the material of the artificial levees
Artificial levees have major importance in protecting human lives and infrastructure as they are essential elements of the flood protection measures. Nevertheless, the lack of the necessary information about their structure and internal composition might cause high risks. To monitor their stability, integrated surveys are needed, including geophysical and geotechnical methods. Levees along the rivers in Hungary were constructed more than 150 years ago, and they were heightened several times; therefore, investigations are required to assure their performance in flood risk mitigation. Our investigation aimed to utilise non-invasive geophysical techniques, primarily electrical resistivity imaging, with the validation of geotechnical investigations to map and compare the compositional and structural variations of two very different levee sections along River Tisza and River Maros. Integrating the analysed drilling data with ERT profiles showed that the main composition of the investigated Tisza levee section is fine and medium silt with an average resistivity 30 Ωm, however, the investigated section of Maros levee was built of not only of fine and medium silt but also of medium and coarse sand exhibiting higher resistivity values reaching up to 2200 Ωm. Several physical parameters were measured to study the nature of constituting levee materials like moisture content, grain-size, porosity, bulk-density, saturated hydraulic conductivity, and resistivity. It was found that most of them show a connection with resistivity, but the hydraulic conductivity did not show a direct connection, however the latter could exhibit the aquitard nature of Tisza levee materials and the non-aquitard nature of Maros levee materials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信