POMPP评分和Boey评分:预测消化性溃疡穿孔的死亡率

Digbijay Bikram Khadka, S. Bharti, Sagun Jung Khadka, Anup Sharma
{"title":"POMPP评分和Boey评分:预测消化性溃疡穿孔的死亡率","authors":"Digbijay Bikram Khadka, S. Bharti, Sagun Jung Khadka, Anup Sharma","doi":"10.3126/jngmc.v20i1.48351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Peptic ulcer is an insult to the mucosa of the upper digestive tract. Helicobacter pylori infection, long term use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or steroids, excessive alcohol ingestion and smoking are common etiological factors. A number of scoring systems for prediction of outcomes in perforated peptic ulcer patients have been developed such as Predictive score of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer score and Boey score. \nAims: To evaluate Predictive score of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer score and Boey Score in predicting accuracy of mortality in patients with peptic ulcer perforation. \nMethods: A hospital based study was conducted from June 2021 to May 2022 in the department of Surgery, Nepalgunj Medical College, Kohalpur. The Predictive score of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer and Boey score were recorded after history taking, physical examination, basic pre-operative investigations and radiological imaging. The patients were classified into high risk and low risk categories based on scores and followed up to predict the mortality within 30 days post operatively. \nResults: 80 patients were included in the study. 53 were male and 27 female. Peptic ulcer perforation was seen more in age groups of 45 to 60 years. In Boey score 8 patients out of 27 high risk patients died whereas in Predictive score of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer score 8 patients died out of 12 high risk patients. When compared, predictive score of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer was found to be more accurate than Boey score (p-<0.05) score. \nConclusion: Predictive score of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer is easy to use and more accurate in predicting mortality in peptic ulcer perforation than Boey score.","PeriodicalId":166882,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepalgunj Medical College","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"POMPP Score and Boey Score: To Predict Mortality in Peptic Ulcer Perforation\",\"authors\":\"Digbijay Bikram Khadka, S. Bharti, Sagun Jung Khadka, Anup Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/jngmc.v20i1.48351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Peptic ulcer is an insult to the mucosa of the upper digestive tract. Helicobacter pylori infection, long term use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or steroids, excessive alcohol ingestion and smoking are common etiological factors. A number of scoring systems for prediction of outcomes in perforated peptic ulcer patients have been developed such as Predictive score of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer score and Boey score. \\nAims: To evaluate Predictive score of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer score and Boey Score in predicting accuracy of mortality in patients with peptic ulcer perforation. \\nMethods: A hospital based study was conducted from June 2021 to May 2022 in the department of Surgery, Nepalgunj Medical College, Kohalpur. The Predictive score of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer and Boey score were recorded after history taking, physical examination, basic pre-operative investigations and radiological imaging. The patients were classified into high risk and low risk categories based on scores and followed up to predict the mortality within 30 days post operatively. \\nResults: 80 patients were included in the study. 53 were male and 27 female. Peptic ulcer perforation was seen more in age groups of 45 to 60 years. In Boey score 8 patients out of 27 high risk patients died whereas in Predictive score of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer score 8 patients died out of 12 high risk patients. When compared, predictive score of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer was found to be more accurate than Boey score (p-<0.05) score. \\nConclusion: Predictive score of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer is easy to use and more accurate in predicting mortality in peptic ulcer perforation than Boey score.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nepalgunj Medical College\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nepalgunj Medical College\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/jngmc.v20i1.48351\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepalgunj Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jngmc.v20i1.48351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:消化性溃疡是对上消化道粘膜的一种损伤。幽门螺杆菌感染、长期使用非甾体类抗炎药或类固醇、过量饮酒和吸烟是常见的病因。许多用于预测穿孔性消化性溃疡患者预后的评分系统已经被开发出来,如穿孔性消化性溃疡死亡率预测评分和Boey评分。目的:评价穿孔性消化性溃疡死亡率预测评分和Boey评分对消化性溃疡穿孔患者死亡率的预测准确性。方法:于2021年6月至2022年5月在科哈尔布尔尼泊尔医学院外科进行以医院为基础的研究。经病史调查、体格检查、术前基本检查及影像学检查,记录穿孔性消化性溃疡死亡率预测评分及Boey评分。根据评分将患者分为高危和低危两类,随访预测术后30 d内的死亡率。结果:80例患者纳入研究。男性53人,女性27人。消化性溃疡穿孔多见于45 ~ 60岁年龄组。在Boey评分中,27例高危患者中有8例死亡,而在穿孔性消化性溃疡死亡率预测评分中,12例高危患者中有8例死亡。经比较,穿孔性消化性溃疡死亡率预测评分比Boey评分更准确(p <0.05)。结论:穿孔性消化性溃疡死亡率预测评分较Boey评分更易于使用,预测穿孔性消化性溃疡死亡率更准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
POMPP Score and Boey Score: To Predict Mortality in Peptic Ulcer Perforation
Introduction: Peptic ulcer is an insult to the mucosa of the upper digestive tract. Helicobacter pylori infection, long term use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or steroids, excessive alcohol ingestion and smoking are common etiological factors. A number of scoring systems for prediction of outcomes in perforated peptic ulcer patients have been developed such as Predictive score of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer score and Boey score. Aims: To evaluate Predictive score of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer score and Boey Score in predicting accuracy of mortality in patients with peptic ulcer perforation. Methods: A hospital based study was conducted from June 2021 to May 2022 in the department of Surgery, Nepalgunj Medical College, Kohalpur. The Predictive score of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer and Boey score were recorded after history taking, physical examination, basic pre-operative investigations and radiological imaging. The patients were classified into high risk and low risk categories based on scores and followed up to predict the mortality within 30 days post operatively. Results: 80 patients were included in the study. 53 were male and 27 female. Peptic ulcer perforation was seen more in age groups of 45 to 60 years. In Boey score 8 patients out of 27 high risk patients died whereas in Predictive score of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer score 8 patients died out of 12 high risk patients. When compared, predictive score of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer was found to be more accurate than Boey score (p-<0.05) score. Conclusion: Predictive score of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer is easy to use and more accurate in predicting mortality in peptic ulcer perforation than Boey score.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信