M. Finch, T. Lintern, A. Taberner, Poul M. F. Nielsen
{"title":"基于模型的惯性测量单元运动估计的有效性","authors":"M. Finch, T. Lintern, A. Taberner, Poul M. F. Nielsen","doi":"10.1109/ICSENST.2011.6137053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the effectiveness of using a mathematical model to improve motion estimates from an inertial measurement unit (IMU). Our custom built IMU (termed WIMOTIONZ) is capable of measuring acceleration, angular rate, and the magnetic field vector in three axes. A magnetometer calibration technique that removes external magnetic disturbances is discussed, and the objective function used in the optimisation routine is presented. The addition of a model is shown to decrease the RMS error, with respect to a “gold-standard” encoder, by 67% compared with only using a magnetometer. Combining the IMU and model is shown to predict the position of the sensor to within 1% of its physically measured value.","PeriodicalId":202062,"journal":{"name":"2011 Fifth International Conference on Sensing Technology","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of model-based motion estimation from an inertial measurement unit\",\"authors\":\"M. Finch, T. Lintern, A. Taberner, Poul M. F. Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSENST.2011.6137053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the effectiveness of using a mathematical model to improve motion estimates from an inertial measurement unit (IMU). Our custom built IMU (termed WIMOTIONZ) is capable of measuring acceleration, angular rate, and the magnetic field vector in three axes. A magnetometer calibration technique that removes external magnetic disturbances is discussed, and the objective function used in the optimisation routine is presented. The addition of a model is shown to decrease the RMS error, with respect to a “gold-standard” encoder, by 67% compared with only using a magnetometer. Combining the IMU and model is shown to predict the position of the sensor to within 1% of its physically measured value.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 Fifth International Conference on Sensing Technology\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 Fifth International Conference on Sensing Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSENST.2011.6137053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 Fifth International Conference on Sensing Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSENST.2011.6137053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effectiveness of model-based motion estimation from an inertial measurement unit
This article examines the effectiveness of using a mathematical model to improve motion estimates from an inertial measurement unit (IMU). Our custom built IMU (termed WIMOTIONZ) is capable of measuring acceleration, angular rate, and the magnetic field vector in three axes. A magnetometer calibration technique that removes external magnetic disturbances is discussed, and the objective function used in the optimisation routine is presented. The addition of a model is shown to decrease the RMS error, with respect to a “gold-standard” encoder, by 67% compared with only using a magnetometer. Combining the IMU and model is shown to predict the position of the sensor to within 1% of its physically measured value.