现代文学研究中互文性问题的理论层面

A. Ilunina
{"title":"现代文学研究中互文性问题的理论层面","authors":"A. Ilunina","doi":"10.2991/TPHD-18.2019.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The articles deals with the theoretical aspects of the problem of intertexuality. The special attention is given to the formation of the term in the works of M.M. Bachtin and J. Kristeva and to its definition in the modern literary studies. Intertextuality is seen as a central feature of postmodern poetics, the basis of postmodern writing. In postmodern philosophy the interaction of texts appears as a universal principle of the existence of culture. The concept of the world as text, characteristic of the current cultural situation, implies that every text, be it literary, historical, social, turns out, regardless of the author’s will, involved in interaction with other texts, both created before him and at the same time and written later However, despite some differences in approaches and formulations, there is a common desire of scholars to reflect in their definitions such underlying property as intertextuality, as conscious from the point of view of the author's desire to establish links between his work and the works of his","PeriodicalId":151404,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference \"Topical Problems of Philology and Didactics: Interdisciplinary Approach in Humanities and Social Sciences\" (TPHD 2018)","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theoretical Aspects of Problem of Intertextuality in Modern Literary Studies\",\"authors\":\"A. Ilunina\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/TPHD-18.2019.32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The articles deals with the theoretical aspects of the problem of intertexuality. The special attention is given to the formation of the term in the works of M.M. Bachtin and J. Kristeva and to its definition in the modern literary studies. Intertextuality is seen as a central feature of postmodern poetics, the basis of postmodern writing. In postmodern philosophy the interaction of texts appears as a universal principle of the existence of culture. The concept of the world as text, characteristic of the current cultural situation, implies that every text, be it literary, historical, social, turns out, regardless of the author’s will, involved in interaction with other texts, both created before him and at the same time and written later However, despite some differences in approaches and formulations, there is a common desire of scholars to reflect in their definitions such underlying property as intertextuality, as conscious from the point of view of the author's desire to establish links between his work and the works of his\",\"PeriodicalId\":151404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference \\\"Topical Problems of Philology and Didactics: Interdisciplinary Approach in Humanities and Social Sciences\\\" (TPHD 2018)\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference \\\"Topical Problems of Philology and Didactics: Interdisciplinary Approach in Humanities and Social Sciences\\\" (TPHD 2018)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/TPHD-18.2019.32\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference \"Topical Problems of Philology and Didactics: Interdisciplinary Approach in Humanities and Social Sciences\" (TPHD 2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/TPHD-18.2019.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章涉及互性问题的理论方面。本文特别关注了这一术语在巴赫汀和克里斯蒂娃作品中的形成及其在现代文学研究中的定义。互文性被视为后现代诗学的核心特征,是后现代写作的基础。在后现代哲学中,文本的相互作用表现为文化存在的普遍原则。世界作为文本的概念是当前文化形势的特征,它意味着每一个文本,无论是文学的、历史的、社会的,无论作者的意愿如何,都与其他文本相互作用,无论是在他之前创造的,还是在他同时创造的,还是在他之后创作的。然而,尽管在方法和表述上存在一些差异,学者们都有一个共同的愿望,即在他们的定义中反映出互文性等潜在属性。作为有意识的从作者的角度来看,建立自己的作品和他的作品之间的联系的愿望
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Theoretical Aspects of Problem of Intertextuality in Modern Literary Studies
The articles deals with the theoretical aspects of the problem of intertexuality. The special attention is given to the formation of the term in the works of M.M. Bachtin and J. Kristeva and to its definition in the modern literary studies. Intertextuality is seen as a central feature of postmodern poetics, the basis of postmodern writing. In postmodern philosophy the interaction of texts appears as a universal principle of the existence of culture. The concept of the world as text, characteristic of the current cultural situation, implies that every text, be it literary, historical, social, turns out, regardless of the author’s will, involved in interaction with other texts, both created before him and at the same time and written later However, despite some differences in approaches and formulations, there is a common desire of scholars to reflect in their definitions such underlying property as intertextuality, as conscious from the point of view of the author's desire to establish links between his work and the works of his
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信