暴力维和:镇压手段和技术的兴起

S. Wright
{"title":"暴力维和:镇压手段和技术的兴起","authors":"S. Wright","doi":"10.1177/1743453X0500100106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Violent ‘peace keeping’ is a contradiction in terms but not if we analyse the provision of coercive law enforcement as just another organising process in state bureaucracies. This paper argues that events surrounding 9/11 merely accelerated processes of coercive peace keeping, which were already re-orientating following the end of the Cold-war. Abstract : Violent ‘peace keeping’ is a contradiction in terms but not if we analyse the provision of coercive law enforcement as just another organising process in state bureaucracies. This paper argues that events surrounding 9/11 merely accelerated processes of coercive peace keeping, which were already re-orientating following the cold war. The technologies used for coercive peacekeeping operations are designed to mask the level of violence being used. These include new methods of tracking and punishing dissent as well as prison techniques and technologies for disabling resistance. Such tools to quash dissent are big business and the security apparatus is permeated by commercial interests aggressively marketing technical fixes. Future researchers and NGOs will need to deconstruct these masks, without themselves rising up the food chain of","PeriodicalId":381236,"journal":{"name":"Politics and Ethics Review","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Violent Peacekeeping: The Rise and Rise of Repressive Techniques and Technologies\",\"authors\":\"S. Wright\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1743453X0500100106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Violent ‘peace keeping’ is a contradiction in terms but not if we analyse the provision of coercive law enforcement as just another organising process in state bureaucracies. This paper argues that events surrounding 9/11 merely accelerated processes of coercive peace keeping, which were already re-orientating following the end of the Cold-war. Abstract : Violent ‘peace keeping’ is a contradiction in terms but not if we analyse the provision of coercive law enforcement as just another organising process in state bureaucracies. This paper argues that events surrounding 9/11 merely accelerated processes of coercive peace keeping, which were already re-orientating following the cold war. The technologies used for coercive peacekeeping operations are designed to mask the level of violence being used. These include new methods of tracking and punishing dissent as well as prison techniques and technologies for disabling resistance. Such tools to quash dissent are big business and the security apparatus is permeated by commercial interests aggressively marketing technical fixes. Future researchers and NGOs will need to deconstruct these masks, without themselves rising up the food chain of\",\"PeriodicalId\":381236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politics and Ethics Review\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politics and Ethics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1743453X0500100106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics and Ethics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1743453X0500100106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

暴力的“维持和平”在术语上是矛盾的,但如果我们把强制性执法的规定分析为国家官僚机构的另一个组织过程,就不会出现这种矛盾。本文认为,围绕9/11的事件只是加速了强制维持和平的进程,这一进程在冷战结束后已经重新定位。摘要:暴力“维持和平”在术语上是矛盾的,但如果我们把强制性执法作为国家官僚机构的另一种组织过程来分析,就不会出现这种矛盾。本文认为,围绕9/11的事件只是加速了强制维持和平的进程,这一进程在冷战后已经重新定位。用于强制维持和平行动的技术旨在掩盖所使用的暴力程度。这些措施包括追踪和惩罚异见人士的新方法,以及监狱技术和使抵抗力量丧失能力的新技术。这些压制异见的工具是一笔大生意,安全机构中充斥着积极推销技术解决方案的商业利益。未来的研究人员和非政府组织需要解构这些面具,而不是让自己上升到食物链的顶端
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Violent Peacekeeping: The Rise and Rise of Repressive Techniques and Technologies
Violent ‘peace keeping’ is a contradiction in terms but not if we analyse the provision of coercive law enforcement as just another organising process in state bureaucracies. This paper argues that events surrounding 9/11 merely accelerated processes of coercive peace keeping, which were already re-orientating following the end of the Cold-war. Abstract : Violent ‘peace keeping’ is a contradiction in terms but not if we analyse the provision of coercive law enforcement as just another organising process in state bureaucracies. This paper argues that events surrounding 9/11 merely accelerated processes of coercive peace keeping, which were already re-orientating following the cold war. The technologies used for coercive peacekeeping operations are designed to mask the level of violence being used. These include new methods of tracking and punishing dissent as well as prison techniques and technologies for disabling resistance. Such tools to quash dissent are big business and the security apparatus is permeated by commercial interests aggressively marketing technical fixes. Future researchers and NGOs will need to deconstruct these masks, without themselves rising up the food chain of
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信