加拿大的飞行机器人和隐私

Paul D M Holden
{"title":"加拿大的飞行机器人和隐私","authors":"Paul D M Holden","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2571490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drones have been a hot topic in recent years particularly when used in war and in domestic police operations. Drones have also attracted attention because of high-profile plans to use them for package delivery, among other things. While the glamourous and future uses of drones catch media attention, drones are already being used in the private sector for more mundane purposes including surveying, infrastructure inspection and real estate sales promotion. While the privacy threats of military and police drones are widely discussed, privacy concerns of private drones have attracted much less consideration.This paper looks at the privacy risks of private drones in Canada. It begins with an overview of the uses of private drones and their regulation in Canada. Regulation of drones in Canada is quite permissive and does not address the privacy risks. The paper then presents several privacy theories and a deeper discussion of two problems caused by technology such as drones: data aggregation and erosion of privacy in public. The paper then considers some theoretical and practical legal protections that might be used to protect against drone privacy invasion. The more theoretical include the torts of trespass and nuisance. The more practical include the tort of intrusion upon seclusion and the Personal Information and Electronic Documents Act. The paper concludes that the dominant theories of privacy embedded in Canadian law are not fully prepared for the challenge of drones, though the tort of intrusion upon seclusion holds some promise for the future.","PeriodicalId":263812,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Law and Technology","volume":"12 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flying Robots and Privacy in Canada\",\"authors\":\"Paul D M Holden\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2571490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Drones have been a hot topic in recent years particularly when used in war and in domestic police operations. Drones have also attracted attention because of high-profile plans to use them for package delivery, among other things. While the glamourous and future uses of drones catch media attention, drones are already being used in the private sector for more mundane purposes including surveying, infrastructure inspection and real estate sales promotion. While the privacy threats of military and police drones are widely discussed, privacy concerns of private drones have attracted much less consideration.This paper looks at the privacy risks of private drones in Canada. It begins with an overview of the uses of private drones and their regulation in Canada. Regulation of drones in Canada is quite permissive and does not address the privacy risks. The paper then presents several privacy theories and a deeper discussion of two problems caused by technology such as drones: data aggregation and erosion of privacy in public. The paper then considers some theoretical and practical legal protections that might be used to protect against drone privacy invasion. The more theoretical include the torts of trespass and nuisance. The more practical include the tort of intrusion upon seclusion and the Personal Information and Electronic Documents Act. The paper concludes that the dominant theories of privacy embedded in Canadian law are not fully prepared for the challenge of drones, though the tort of intrusion upon seclusion holds some promise for the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":263812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Law and Technology\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Law and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2571490\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Law and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2571490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

近年来,无人机一直是一个热门话题,特别是在战争和国内警察行动中使用时。无人机引起关注的另一个原因是,一些高调的计划将无人机用于包裹递送等。虽然无人机的魅力和未来用途引起了媒体的关注,但无人机已经在私营部门用于更普通的目的,包括测量、基础设施检查和房地产销售促进。虽然军用和警用无人机的隐私威胁被广泛讨论,但私人无人机的隐私问题却很少引起人们的关注。本文着眼于加拿大私人无人机的隐私风险。它首先概述了私人无人机的使用及其在加拿大的监管。加拿大对无人机的监管相当宽松,没有解决隐私风险。然后,论文提出了几种隐私理论,并对无人机等技术引起的两个问题进行了更深入的讨论:数据聚合和公共隐私的侵蚀。然后,论文考虑了一些可能用于防止无人机隐私侵犯的理论和实践法律保护。理论性更强的侵权包括非法侵入和妨害。较为实际的侵权行为包括侵犯隐私侵权行为和《个人信息与电子文件法》。这篇论文的结论是,加拿大法律中关于隐私的主流理论并没有为无人机的挑战做好充分的准备,尽管侵犯隐私的侵权行为在未来有一些希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Flying Robots and Privacy in Canada
Drones have been a hot topic in recent years particularly when used in war and in domestic police operations. Drones have also attracted attention because of high-profile plans to use them for package delivery, among other things. While the glamourous and future uses of drones catch media attention, drones are already being used in the private sector for more mundane purposes including surveying, infrastructure inspection and real estate sales promotion. While the privacy threats of military and police drones are widely discussed, privacy concerns of private drones have attracted much less consideration.This paper looks at the privacy risks of private drones in Canada. It begins with an overview of the uses of private drones and their regulation in Canada. Regulation of drones in Canada is quite permissive and does not address the privacy risks. The paper then presents several privacy theories and a deeper discussion of two problems caused by technology such as drones: data aggregation and erosion of privacy in public. The paper then considers some theoretical and practical legal protections that might be used to protect against drone privacy invasion. The more theoretical include the torts of trespass and nuisance. The more practical include the tort of intrusion upon seclusion and the Personal Information and Electronic Documents Act. The paper concludes that the dominant theories of privacy embedded in Canadian law are not fully prepared for the challenge of drones, though the tort of intrusion upon seclusion holds some promise for the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信