{"title":"离散小波变换与线性预测编码的比较研究","authors":"D. Ambika, V. Radha","doi":"10.1109/WICT.2012.6409214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper the analysis of the compression process was performed by comparing the compressed signal against the original signal. To do this the most powerful speech analysis and compression techniques such as Linear Predictive Coding (LPC) and Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) was implemented using MATLAB. Here nine samples of spoken words are collected from different speakers and are used for implementation. The results obtained from LPC were compared with other compression technique called Discrete Wavelet Transform. Finally the results were evaluated in terms of compressed ratio (CR), Peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and Normalized root-mean square error (NRMSE). The result shows that DWT performance was better for these samples than the LPC method.","PeriodicalId":445333,"journal":{"name":"2012 World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study between Discrete Wavelet Transform and Linear Predictive Coding\",\"authors\":\"D. Ambika, V. Radha\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WICT.2012.6409214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper the analysis of the compression process was performed by comparing the compressed signal against the original signal. To do this the most powerful speech analysis and compression techniques such as Linear Predictive Coding (LPC) and Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) was implemented using MATLAB. Here nine samples of spoken words are collected from different speakers and are used for implementation. The results obtained from LPC were compared with other compression technique called Discrete Wavelet Transform. Finally the results were evaluated in terms of compressed ratio (CR), Peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and Normalized root-mean square error (NRMSE). The result shows that DWT performance was better for these samples than the LPC method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":445333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WICT.2012.6409214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WICT.2012.6409214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparative study between Discrete Wavelet Transform and Linear Predictive Coding
In this paper the analysis of the compression process was performed by comparing the compressed signal against the original signal. To do this the most powerful speech analysis and compression techniques such as Linear Predictive Coding (LPC) and Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) was implemented using MATLAB. Here nine samples of spoken words are collected from different speakers and are used for implementation. The results obtained from LPC were compared with other compression technique called Discrete Wavelet Transform. Finally the results were evaluated in terms of compressed ratio (CR), Peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and Normalized root-mean square error (NRMSE). The result shows that DWT performance was better for these samples than the LPC method.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
