精神痛苦或身体不便(因人身伤害或死亡而造成的除外)

A. Burrows
{"title":"精神痛苦或身体不便(因人身伤害或死亡而造成的除外)","authors":"A. Burrows","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mental distress covers, for example, disappointment, worry, anxiety, fear, upset, and annoyance. On the traditional approach taken by the courts, mental distress, along with ‘pain and suffering’ consequent on a personal injury and ‘bereavement’, compensated under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976, are the heads of non-pecuniary loss covering the claimant’s loss of happiness and distress in contrast to the other ‘objective’ non-pecuniary losses (such as ‘loss of amenity’ consequent on a personal injury and ‘loss of reputation’). On an alternative view, all non-pecuniary loss is regarded as ultimately dealing with distress or loss of happiness and ‘mental distress’ is seen as a residual head for distress not falling within any of the other heads.","PeriodicalId":273138,"journal":{"name":"Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mental distress or physical inconvenience (except consequent on personal injury or death)\",\"authors\":\"A. Burrows\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mental distress covers, for example, disappointment, worry, anxiety, fear, upset, and annoyance. On the traditional approach taken by the courts, mental distress, along with ‘pain and suffering’ consequent on a personal injury and ‘bereavement’, compensated under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976, are the heads of non-pecuniary loss covering the claimant’s loss of happiness and distress in contrast to the other ‘objective’ non-pecuniary losses (such as ‘loss of amenity’ consequent on a personal injury and ‘loss of reputation’). On an alternative view, all non-pecuniary loss is regarded as ultimately dealing with distress or loss of happiness and ‘mental distress’ is seen as a residual head for distress not falling within any of the other heads.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精神上的痛苦包括失望、担心、焦虑、恐惧、不安和烦恼。根据法院采取的传统方法,精神痛苦,以及人身伤害和“丧亲之痛”,根据1976年“致命事故法”进行赔偿,是非金钱损失的主要部分,涵盖了索赔人的幸福和痛苦的损失,而不是其他“客观的”非金钱损失(如人身伤害和“名誉损失”造成的“舒适损失”)。另一种观点认为,所有非金钱损失都被视为最终处理痛苦或失去幸福,而“精神痛苦”被视为痛苦的剩余头部,不属于任何其他头部。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mental distress or physical inconvenience (except consequent on personal injury or death)
Mental distress covers, for example, disappointment, worry, anxiety, fear, upset, and annoyance. On the traditional approach taken by the courts, mental distress, along with ‘pain and suffering’ consequent on a personal injury and ‘bereavement’, compensated under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976, are the heads of non-pecuniary loss covering the claimant’s loss of happiness and distress in contrast to the other ‘objective’ non-pecuniary losses (such as ‘loss of amenity’ consequent on a personal injury and ‘loss of reputation’). On an alternative view, all non-pecuniary loss is regarded as ultimately dealing with distress or loss of happiness and ‘mental distress’ is seen as a residual head for distress not falling within any of the other heads.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信