当代中国的Lex Mercatoria

Ying Yu
{"title":"当代中国的Lex Mercatoria","authors":"Ying Yu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2590350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Notwithstanding the negative effects arising from global economic recession, E-commerce transactions in China has increased steadily. Meanwhile, the legal system still lacks specific regulations concerning consumer protection of distance contracts. Nevertheless, the distance consumer market in China is well self-regulated, due to its reliance on a version of the Lex Mercatoria. This article will discuss the detail of the modern Lex Mercatoria that has developed in China, and draw conclusions on its future. The first aspect is “right of withdrawal” which has been adapted from the European Union’s legal system. Another aspect is “escrow” which Chinese is known as “third-party payment method”. This has been borrowed from the common legal system. The former is a self redress mechanism whereby the consumer can protect whereby the consumer can protect himself during the purchasing process; the latter is a mechanism for security of payment. These two legal concepts do not operate in isolate. On the contrary, they cooperatively break through the difficulty that can occur in practice, when the trader fails to reimburse the consumer. Even though the EU Directives require the trader to return all payments when the right of withdrawal id exercised by the consumer, repayment is frequently withheld or delayed. This approach enrolls escrow to solve the problem, by returning the payment via an escrow holder, which is a credit-neutral third party. The combination of these two concepts makes up the hybrid approach of modern Lex Mercatoria in China. The paper will concludes that increased protection for distance consumer protection in China will be advanced by the use of this Lex Mercatoria and led to further development of relevant legislation.","PeriodicalId":142664,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Regulation that Pertains to Consumer Markets (Sub-Topic)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contemporary Lex Mercatoria in China\",\"authors\":\"Ying Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2590350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Notwithstanding the negative effects arising from global economic recession, E-commerce transactions in China has increased steadily. Meanwhile, the legal system still lacks specific regulations concerning consumer protection of distance contracts. Nevertheless, the distance consumer market in China is well self-regulated, due to its reliance on a version of the Lex Mercatoria. This article will discuss the detail of the modern Lex Mercatoria that has developed in China, and draw conclusions on its future. The first aspect is “right of withdrawal” which has been adapted from the European Union’s legal system. Another aspect is “escrow” which Chinese is known as “third-party payment method”. This has been borrowed from the common legal system. The former is a self redress mechanism whereby the consumer can protect whereby the consumer can protect himself during the purchasing process; the latter is a mechanism for security of payment. These two legal concepts do not operate in isolate. On the contrary, they cooperatively break through the difficulty that can occur in practice, when the trader fails to reimburse the consumer. Even though the EU Directives require the trader to return all payments when the right of withdrawal id exercised by the consumer, repayment is frequently withheld or delayed. This approach enrolls escrow to solve the problem, by returning the payment via an escrow holder, which is a credit-neutral third party. The combination of these two concepts makes up the hybrid approach of modern Lex Mercatoria in China. The paper will concludes that increased protection for distance consumer protection in China will be advanced by the use of this Lex Mercatoria and led to further development of relevant legislation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Other Regulation that Pertains to Consumer Markets (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Other Regulation that Pertains to Consumer Markets (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2590350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Other Regulation that Pertains to Consumer Markets (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2590350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管受到全球经济衰退的负面影响,中国的电子商务交易仍在稳步增长。同时,法律体系对远程合同的消费者保护还缺乏具体的规定。然而,由于中国的远程消费市场依赖于Lex Mercatoria的一个版本,因此它的自我监管很好。本文将详细讨论在中国发展起来的现代墨卡托利亚法,并对其未来作出总结。第一个方面是“撤回权”,这是改编自欧盟法律制度的。另一个方面是“托管”,中文称为“第三方支付方式”。这是从普通法律制度中借鉴来的。前者是一种自我补偿机制,消费者可以在购买过程中保护自己;后者是一种支付安全机制。这两个法律概念并非孤立地起作用。相反,他们合作突破了在实践中可能出现的困难,当贸易商无法偿还消费者。尽管欧盟指令要求,当消费者行使提款权时,贸易商必须退还所有款项,但还款经常被扣留或延迟。这种方法通过第三方托管来解决问题,通过第三方托管持有人(信用中立的第三方)返回付款。这两个概念的结合构成了中国现代墨卡托利亚法的混合路径。本文的结论是,该法律的运用将促进中国对远程消费者保护的加强,并导致相关立法的进一步发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contemporary Lex Mercatoria in China
Notwithstanding the negative effects arising from global economic recession, E-commerce transactions in China has increased steadily. Meanwhile, the legal system still lacks specific regulations concerning consumer protection of distance contracts. Nevertheless, the distance consumer market in China is well self-regulated, due to its reliance on a version of the Lex Mercatoria. This article will discuss the detail of the modern Lex Mercatoria that has developed in China, and draw conclusions on its future. The first aspect is “right of withdrawal” which has been adapted from the European Union’s legal system. Another aspect is “escrow” which Chinese is known as “third-party payment method”. This has been borrowed from the common legal system. The former is a self redress mechanism whereby the consumer can protect whereby the consumer can protect himself during the purchasing process; the latter is a mechanism for security of payment. These two legal concepts do not operate in isolate. On the contrary, they cooperatively break through the difficulty that can occur in practice, when the trader fails to reimburse the consumer. Even though the EU Directives require the trader to return all payments when the right of withdrawal id exercised by the consumer, repayment is frequently withheld or delayed. This approach enrolls escrow to solve the problem, by returning the payment via an escrow holder, which is a credit-neutral third party. The combination of these two concepts makes up the hybrid approach of modern Lex Mercatoria in China. The paper will concludes that increased protection for distance consumer protection in China will be advanced by the use of this Lex Mercatoria and led to further development of relevant legislation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信