前线上的言论自由:法律争议仍在继续

C. B. Gilmore, Martha A. Broderick
{"title":"前线上的言论自由:法律争议仍在继续","authors":"C. B. Gilmore, Martha A. Broderick","doi":"10.2190/H2EX-4A3R-292V-C0F8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"First Amendment speech rights are increasingly becoming a source of controversy on college and university campuses. As the Supreme Court struggles to establish a balance between the teacher, as citizen, and the university, as employer, the line between protected and unprotected speech has been bent but not broken. An examination of recent court decisions reveals some answers and provides educators with guidelines for determining the nature and extent of the protections offered within the purview of academic free speech rights. Indicators of the more typical issues raised about the conflict between free speech and academia are suggested. The free exercise of First Amendment rights is coming under greater scrutiny within the educational community. Increasingly, constitutionally protected interests-especially involving the freedom of speech-are being challenged by teachers and other educators. Due to recent developments, they could face discipline up to and including termination for classroom utterances. The problem, as enunciated by the Supreme Court, has been to establish a balance between “the interests of the teacher, as a citizen, in commenting upon matters of public concern” and the “the interests of the state, as an employer, in promoting the efficiency of the public service it performs” [ I , pp. 1734-17351. In this leading case, the right of faculty to speak out on public matters was settled in part but questions still remain unanswered. The Supreme Court, in Pickring, refrained from establishing a general standard for judging statements by public employees [l]. Where, then, is the line between protected and unprotected speech to be","PeriodicalId":371129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Individual Employment Rights","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Free Speech on the Firing Line: the Legal Controversy Continues\",\"authors\":\"C. B. Gilmore, Martha A. Broderick\",\"doi\":\"10.2190/H2EX-4A3R-292V-C0F8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"First Amendment speech rights are increasingly becoming a source of controversy on college and university campuses. As the Supreme Court struggles to establish a balance between the teacher, as citizen, and the university, as employer, the line between protected and unprotected speech has been bent but not broken. An examination of recent court decisions reveals some answers and provides educators with guidelines for determining the nature and extent of the protections offered within the purview of academic free speech rights. Indicators of the more typical issues raised about the conflict between free speech and academia are suggested. The free exercise of First Amendment rights is coming under greater scrutiny within the educational community. Increasingly, constitutionally protected interests-especially involving the freedom of speech-are being challenged by teachers and other educators. Due to recent developments, they could face discipline up to and including termination for classroom utterances. The problem, as enunciated by the Supreme Court, has been to establish a balance between “the interests of the teacher, as a citizen, in commenting upon matters of public concern” and the “the interests of the state, as an employer, in promoting the efficiency of the public service it performs” [ I , pp. 1734-17351. In this leading case, the right of faculty to speak out on public matters was settled in part but questions still remain unanswered. The Supreme Court, in Pickring, refrained from establishing a general standard for judging statements by public employees [l]. Where, then, is the line between protected and unprotected speech to be\",\"PeriodicalId\":371129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Individual Employment Rights\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Individual Employment Rights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2190/H2EX-4A3R-292V-C0F8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Individual Employment Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2190/H2EX-4A3R-292V-C0F8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第一修正案的言论权利正日益成为高校校园争议的一个来源。当最高法院努力在作为公民的教师和作为雇主的大学之间建立平衡时,受保护和不受保护的言论之间的界限被弯曲了,但没有被打破。对最近法院判决的研究揭示了一些答案,并为教育工作者提供了确定学术言论自由权范围内所提供保护的性质和范围的指导方针。提出了关于言论自由与学术之间冲突的更典型问题的指标。教育界对第一修正案权利的自由行使正受到更严格的审查。受宪法保护的利益——尤其是涉及言论自由的利益——正日益受到教师和其他教育工作者的挑战。由于最近的事态发展,他们可能面临纪律处分,包括在课堂上发表言论而被解雇。正如最高法院所阐明的那样,问题是在“教师作为公民的利益,在评论公众关注的问题上”和“国家作为雇主的利益,在提高公共服务的效率上”之间建立一种平衡[I, pp. 1734-17351]。在这一主要案例中,教员就公共事务发表意见的权利在一定程度上得到了解决,但问题仍未得到解答。在Pickring一案中,最高法院没有建立评判公职人员陈述的一般标准[1]。那么,受保护和不受保护的言论之间的界限在哪里呢
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Free Speech on the Firing Line: the Legal Controversy Continues
First Amendment speech rights are increasingly becoming a source of controversy on college and university campuses. As the Supreme Court struggles to establish a balance between the teacher, as citizen, and the university, as employer, the line between protected and unprotected speech has been bent but not broken. An examination of recent court decisions reveals some answers and provides educators with guidelines for determining the nature and extent of the protections offered within the purview of academic free speech rights. Indicators of the more typical issues raised about the conflict between free speech and academia are suggested. The free exercise of First Amendment rights is coming under greater scrutiny within the educational community. Increasingly, constitutionally protected interests-especially involving the freedom of speech-are being challenged by teachers and other educators. Due to recent developments, they could face discipline up to and including termination for classroom utterances. The problem, as enunciated by the Supreme Court, has been to establish a balance between “the interests of the teacher, as a citizen, in commenting upon matters of public concern” and the “the interests of the state, as an employer, in promoting the efficiency of the public service it performs” [ I , pp. 1734-17351. In this leading case, the right of faculty to speak out on public matters was settled in part but questions still remain unanswered. The Supreme Court, in Pickring, refrained from establishing a general standard for judging statements by public employees [l]. Where, then, is the line between protected and unprotected speech to be
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信