谬论

Introduction to Logic Pub Date : 2018-09-03 DOI:10.4324/9781315144016-5

Irving M. Copi, C. Cohen, Victor Rodych

{"title":"谬论","authors":"Irving M. Copi, C. Cohen, Victor Rodych","doi":"10.4324/9781315144016-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tip: Ask yourself what kind of “sample” you’re using: Are you relying on the opinions or experiences of just a few people, or your own experience in just a few situations? If so, consider whether you need more evidence, or perhaps a less sweeping conclusion. (Notice that in the example, the more modest conclusion “Some philosophy classes are hard for some students” would not be a hasty generalization.)","PeriodicalId":246247,"journal":{"name":"Introduction to Logic","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"163","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fallacies\",\"authors\":\"Irving M. Copi, C. Cohen, Victor Rodych\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315144016-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tip: Ask yourself what kind of “sample” you’re using: Are you relying on the opinions or experiences of just a few people, or your own experience in just a few situations? If so, consider whether you need more evidence, or perhaps a less sweeping conclusion. (Notice that in the example, the more modest conclusion “Some philosophy classes are hard for some students” would not be a hasty generalization.)\",\"PeriodicalId\":246247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Introduction to Logic\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"163\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Introduction to Logic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315144016-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Introduction to Logic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315144016-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 163

摘要

小贴士:问问自己你使用的是哪种“样本”:你是依赖于少数人的观点或经验，还是你自己在少数情况下的经验?如果是这样，考虑一下你是否需要更多的证据，或者也许需要一个不那么彻底的结论。(注意，在这个例子中，更温和的结论“一些哲学课程对一些学生来说很难”并不是草率的概括。)

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Fallacies

Tip: Ask yourself what kind of “sample” you’re using: Are you relying on the opinions or experiences of just a few people, or your own experience in just a few situations? If so, consider whether you need more evidence, or perhaps a less sweeping conclusion. (Notice that in the example, the more modest conclusion “Some philosophy classes are hard for some students” would not be a hasty generalization.)

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Introduction to Logic

自引率

0.00%

发文量