全球外汇市场的结算风险:还剩多少?

D. Kos, Richard M. Levich
{"title":"全球外汇市场的结算风险:还剩多少?","authors":"D. Kos, Richard M. Levich","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2827530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Settlement risk is a critical concern in all financial markets and especially so in foreign exchange markets where it poses the threat of complete loss. In this paper, we offer a historical look at how risk mitigation in FX settlement has developed over time. We rely on two surveys conducted by the BIS in 1997 and 2007 and a new survey conducted by CLS Bank in April 2013. Based on our review of the evidence, we find that the market has achieved significant progress in both developing and implementing techniques that have dramatically reduced exposure to FX settlement risk. The share of FX turnover settled by means of traditional correspondent bank arrangements has declined from 85% to 32% to 13% across the three surveys. CLS Bank which offers payment-versus-payment (PVP) settlement and virtually eliminates settlement risk now settles roughly half of all FX turnover. However, because of enormous growth in FX turnover, particularly in emerging market currencies where access to risk mitigation alternatives is less prevalent, the absolute value of FX turnover exposed to settlement risk remains large. Surprisingly, one-quarter of FX turnover in currencies eligible for PVP settlement using CLS Bank still relies on bilateral settlement with some exposure to settlement risk. These findings support the need for banks, industry groups and central banks to remain vigilant and continue their efforts to incentivize PVP settlement positively, making it widely available and utilized, or finding alternative risk mitigating solutions. We offer various approaches to deal with the remaining settlement risk.","PeriodicalId":436944,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Central Banking & Reserves (Topic)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Settlement Risk in the Global FX Market: How Much Remains?\",\"authors\":\"D. Kos, Richard M. Levich\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2827530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Settlement risk is a critical concern in all financial markets and especially so in foreign exchange markets where it poses the threat of complete loss. In this paper, we offer a historical look at how risk mitigation in FX settlement has developed over time. We rely on two surveys conducted by the BIS in 1997 and 2007 and a new survey conducted by CLS Bank in April 2013. Based on our review of the evidence, we find that the market has achieved significant progress in both developing and implementing techniques that have dramatically reduced exposure to FX settlement risk. The share of FX turnover settled by means of traditional correspondent bank arrangements has declined from 85% to 32% to 13% across the three surveys. CLS Bank which offers payment-versus-payment (PVP) settlement and virtually eliminates settlement risk now settles roughly half of all FX turnover. However, because of enormous growth in FX turnover, particularly in emerging market currencies where access to risk mitigation alternatives is less prevalent, the absolute value of FX turnover exposed to settlement risk remains large. Surprisingly, one-quarter of FX turnover in currencies eligible for PVP settlement using CLS Bank still relies on bilateral settlement with some exposure to settlement risk. These findings support the need for banks, industry groups and central banks to remain vigilant and continue their efforts to incentivize PVP settlement positively, making it widely available and utilized, or finding alternative risk mitigating solutions. We offer various approaches to deal with the remaining settlement risk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Central Banking & Reserves (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Central Banking & Reserves (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2827530\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Central Banking & Reserves (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2827530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

结算风险在所有金融市场中都是一个重要的问题,尤其是在外汇市场中,它构成了完全损失的威胁。在本文中,我们对外汇结算风险缓解如何随着时间的推移而发展提供了历史视角。我们的依据是国际清算银行在1997年和2007年进行的两次调查,以及CLS银行在2013年4月进行的一项新调查。根据我们对证据的回顾,我们发现市场在开发和实施技术方面取得了重大进展,这些技术大大降低了外汇结算风险。在三次调查中,通过传统代理银行安排结算的外汇交易份额从85%下降到32%,再下降到13%。CLS银行提供支付对支付(PVP)结算,几乎消除了结算风险,现在结算了大约一半的外汇交易额。然而,由于外汇交易量的巨大增长,特别是新兴市场货币,在这些国家,获得风险缓解替代品的机会不那么普遍,面临结算风险的外汇交易量的绝对值仍然很大。令人惊讶的是,有资格使用CLS银行进行PVP结算的货币的外汇交易量中,有四分之一仍然依赖双边结算,存在一定的结算风险。这些发现表明,银行、行业团体和中央银行需要保持警惕,并继续努力积极激励PVP结算,使其广泛使用和利用,或者寻找替代的风险缓解解决方案。我们提供各种方法来处理剩余的结算风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Settlement Risk in the Global FX Market: How Much Remains?
Settlement risk is a critical concern in all financial markets and especially so in foreign exchange markets where it poses the threat of complete loss. In this paper, we offer a historical look at how risk mitigation in FX settlement has developed over time. We rely on two surveys conducted by the BIS in 1997 and 2007 and a new survey conducted by CLS Bank in April 2013. Based on our review of the evidence, we find that the market has achieved significant progress in both developing and implementing techniques that have dramatically reduced exposure to FX settlement risk. The share of FX turnover settled by means of traditional correspondent bank arrangements has declined from 85% to 32% to 13% across the three surveys. CLS Bank which offers payment-versus-payment (PVP) settlement and virtually eliminates settlement risk now settles roughly half of all FX turnover. However, because of enormous growth in FX turnover, particularly in emerging market currencies where access to risk mitigation alternatives is less prevalent, the absolute value of FX turnover exposed to settlement risk remains large. Surprisingly, one-quarter of FX turnover in currencies eligible for PVP settlement using CLS Bank still relies on bilateral settlement with some exposure to settlement risk. These findings support the need for banks, industry groups and central banks to remain vigilant and continue their efforts to incentivize PVP settlement positively, making it widely available and utilized, or finding alternative risk mitigating solutions. We offer various approaches to deal with the remaining settlement risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信