声带流变学

M. Kimura, N. Tayama
{"title":"声带流变学","authors":"M. Kimura, N. Tayama","doi":"10.5426/LARYNX.25.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to compare the functional biomechanical properties of some injectable phonosurgical biomaterials commonly used for vocal fold augmentation. Linear viscoelastic shear properties of cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA; Juvederm®), micronized AlloDerm (Cymetra®), 3% bovine collagen (Atelocollagen), and calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA; Radiesse®) were determined as functions of frequency covering the phonatory range, and compared to those of the human vocal fold cover. Measurements of elastic shear modulus (G’) and dynamic viscosity (η’) were made up to 250 Hz with a controlled-strain simple-shear rheometer. Linear leastsquares regression was conducted to curve-fit log G’ and log η’ versus log frequency, and statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA. There were statistically significant differences in the magnitudes of G’ and η’ among the phonosurgical materials and the normal human vocal fold cover (p<0.01), whereas there was no significant difference (p<0.05) in pairwise comparisons among all materials and the normal vocal fold cover. The rheometric properties of Juvederm and Atelocollagen were the closest match to those of the vocal fold cover. These findings suggest that none of the tested injectable biomaterials are ideal implants for facilitating the functional vibratory performance of the vocal fold cover. Future studies for the development of materials with optimal viscoelastic properties are warranted.","PeriodicalId":126820,"journal":{"name":"THE LARYNX JAPAN","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rheology of Vocal Foldx\",\"authors\":\"M. Kimura, N. Tayama\",\"doi\":\"10.5426/LARYNX.25.44\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to compare the functional biomechanical properties of some injectable phonosurgical biomaterials commonly used for vocal fold augmentation. Linear viscoelastic shear properties of cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA; Juvederm®), micronized AlloDerm (Cymetra®), 3% bovine collagen (Atelocollagen), and calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA; Radiesse®) were determined as functions of frequency covering the phonatory range, and compared to those of the human vocal fold cover. Measurements of elastic shear modulus (G’) and dynamic viscosity (η’) were made up to 250 Hz with a controlled-strain simple-shear rheometer. Linear leastsquares regression was conducted to curve-fit log G’ and log η’ versus log frequency, and statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA. There were statistically significant differences in the magnitudes of G’ and η’ among the phonosurgical materials and the normal human vocal fold cover (p<0.01), whereas there was no significant difference (p<0.05) in pairwise comparisons among all materials and the normal vocal fold cover. The rheometric properties of Juvederm and Atelocollagen were the closest match to those of the vocal fold cover. These findings suggest that none of the tested injectable biomaterials are ideal implants for facilitating the functional vibratory performance of the vocal fold cover. Future studies for the development of materials with optimal viscoelastic properties are warranted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THE LARYNX JAPAN\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THE LARYNX JAPAN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5426/LARYNX.25.44\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE LARYNX JAPAN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5426/LARYNX.25.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较几种常用的可注射声外科生物材料的功能生物力学特性。交联透明质酸(HA)的线性粘弹性剪切性能Juvederm®)、微粉AlloDerm (Cymetra®)、3%牛胶原蛋白(atelocolen)和羟基磷灰石钙(CaHA;Radiesse®)被确定为覆盖发声范围的频率函数,并与人类声带覆盖的频率进行比较。采用可控应变单剪切流变仪在250 Hz范围内测量弹性剪切模量G′和动态粘度η′。对对数G′和对数η′与对数频率的曲线拟合进行线性最小二乘回归,并用单因素方差分析进行统计分析。声外科材料与正常人声襞盖的G′、η′值差异有统计学意义(p<0.01),而所有材料与正常人声襞盖两两比较差异无统计学意义(p<0.05)。幼皮和胶原的流变学特性与声带盖的流变学特性最接近。这些发现表明,没有一种可注射的生物材料是理想的植入物,以促进声带盖的功能振动性能。未来研究开发具有最佳粘弹性性能的材料是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rheology of Vocal Foldx
The purpose of this study was to compare the functional biomechanical properties of some injectable phonosurgical biomaterials commonly used for vocal fold augmentation. Linear viscoelastic shear properties of cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA; Juvederm®), micronized AlloDerm (Cymetra®), 3% bovine collagen (Atelocollagen), and calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA; Radiesse®) were determined as functions of frequency covering the phonatory range, and compared to those of the human vocal fold cover. Measurements of elastic shear modulus (G’) and dynamic viscosity (η’) were made up to 250 Hz with a controlled-strain simple-shear rheometer. Linear leastsquares regression was conducted to curve-fit log G’ and log η’ versus log frequency, and statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA. There were statistically significant differences in the magnitudes of G’ and η’ among the phonosurgical materials and the normal human vocal fold cover (p<0.01), whereas there was no significant difference (p<0.05) in pairwise comparisons among all materials and the normal vocal fold cover. The rheometric properties of Juvederm and Atelocollagen were the closest match to those of the vocal fold cover. These findings suggest that none of the tested injectable biomaterials are ideal implants for facilitating the functional vibratory performance of the vocal fold cover. Future studies for the development of materials with optimal viscoelastic properties are warranted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信