{"title":"新的完整数据空间和更快的惩罚似然发射断层扫描算法","authors":"J. Fessler, A. Hero","doi":"10.1109/NSSMIC.1993.373624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The classical expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm for image reconstruction suffers from particularly slow convergence when additive background effects such as accidental coincidences and scatter are included. In addition, when smoothness penalties are included in the objective function, the M-step of the EM algorithm becomes intractable due to parameter coupling. The authors describe the space-alternating generalized EM (SAGE) algorithm, in which the parameters are updated sequentially using a sequence of small \"hidden\" data spaces rather than one large complete-data space. The sequential update decouples the M-step, so the maximization can typically be performed analytically. By choosing hidden-data spaces with considerably less Fisher information than the conventional complete-data space for Poisson data, the authors obtain significant improvements in convergence rate. This acceleration is due to statistical considerations, not to numerical overrelaxation methods, so monotonic increases in the objective function and global convergence are guaranteed. Due to the space constraints, the authors focus on the unpenalized case in this summary, and they eliminate derivations that are similar to those in Lange and Carson, J. Comput. Assist. Tomography, vol. 8, no. 2, p.306-16 (1984).<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":287813,"journal":{"name":"1993 IEEE Conference Record Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New complete-data spaces and faster algorithms for penalized-likelihood emission tomography\",\"authors\":\"J. Fessler, A. Hero\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NSSMIC.1993.373624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The classical expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm for image reconstruction suffers from particularly slow convergence when additive background effects such as accidental coincidences and scatter are included. In addition, when smoothness penalties are included in the objective function, the M-step of the EM algorithm becomes intractable due to parameter coupling. The authors describe the space-alternating generalized EM (SAGE) algorithm, in which the parameters are updated sequentially using a sequence of small \\\"hidden\\\" data spaces rather than one large complete-data space. The sequential update decouples the M-step, so the maximization can typically be performed analytically. By choosing hidden-data spaces with considerably less Fisher information than the conventional complete-data space for Poisson data, the authors obtain significant improvements in convergence rate. This acceleration is due to statistical considerations, not to numerical overrelaxation methods, so monotonic increases in the objective function and global convergence are guaranteed. Due to the space constraints, the authors focus on the unpenalized case in this summary, and they eliminate derivations that are similar to those in Lange and Carson, J. Comput. Assist. Tomography, vol. 8, no. 2, p.306-16 (1984).<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":287813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1993 IEEE Conference Record Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1993 IEEE Conference Record Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.1993.373624\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1993 IEEE Conference Record Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.1993.373624","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
摘要
经典的期望最大化(EM)图像重建算法在考虑意外巧合和散射等附加背景效应时收敛速度特别慢。此外,当目标函数中包含平滑惩罚时,EM算法的m步由于参数耦合而变得难以处理。作者描述了空间交替广义电磁(SAGE)算法,该算法使用一系列小的“隐藏”数据空间而不是一个大的完整数据空间来顺序更新参数。顺序更新解耦了m步,因此通常可以解析地执行最大化。通过为泊松数据选择具有比传统完整数据空间少得多的Fisher信息的隐藏数据空间,作者获得了显著的收敛速度改进。这种加速是由于统计上的考虑,而不是数值上的过度松弛方法,因此保证了目标函数的单调增长和全局收敛。由于篇幅限制,作者在本总结中将重点放在未受处罚的情况上,并删除了与Lange和Carson, J. Comput中类似的推导。协助。断层摄影,第8卷,第8期。2,第306-16页(1984)。
New complete-data spaces and faster algorithms for penalized-likelihood emission tomography
The classical expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm for image reconstruction suffers from particularly slow convergence when additive background effects such as accidental coincidences and scatter are included. In addition, when smoothness penalties are included in the objective function, the M-step of the EM algorithm becomes intractable due to parameter coupling. The authors describe the space-alternating generalized EM (SAGE) algorithm, in which the parameters are updated sequentially using a sequence of small "hidden" data spaces rather than one large complete-data space. The sequential update decouples the M-step, so the maximization can typically be performed analytically. By choosing hidden-data spaces with considerably less Fisher information than the conventional complete-data space for Poisson data, the authors obtain significant improvements in convergence rate. This acceleration is due to statistical considerations, not to numerical overrelaxation methods, so monotonic increases in the objective function and global convergence are guaranteed. Due to the space constraints, the authors focus on the unpenalized case in this summary, and they eliminate derivations that are similar to those in Lange and Carson, J. Comput. Assist. Tomography, vol. 8, no. 2, p.306-16 (1984).<>