1871-1881年参加墨尔本大学入学考试的女性

C. Hooper
{"title":"1871-1881年参加墨尔本大学入学考试的女性","authors":"C. Hooper","doi":"10.1080/17508480109556377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In September 1871, the Professorial Board of the University of Melbourne an allmale body declared it 'is a general opinion that the education of girls is distinguished from that of boys by a vagueness and flimsiness of quality.' While the Board offered no evidence to support this claim, its dismissive view of the standard of education offered to girls in Victoria was not unique. Only a few months earlier the editor of the colony's leading newspaper the Argus, had bemoaned the poor state of tuition offered in private girls' schools, and accused the proprietors of these establishments the 'talented sisterhood'of being mere 'educational pretenders'.","PeriodicalId":347655,"journal":{"name":"Melbourne Studies in Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Female entrants to the university of Melbourne's matriculation examination, 1871–1881\",\"authors\":\"C. Hooper\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17508480109556377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In September 1871, the Professorial Board of the University of Melbourne an allmale body declared it 'is a general opinion that the education of girls is distinguished from that of boys by a vagueness and flimsiness of quality.' While the Board offered no evidence to support this claim, its dismissive view of the standard of education offered to girls in Victoria was not unique. Only a few months earlier the editor of the colony's leading newspaper the Argus, had bemoaned the poor state of tuition offered in private girls' schools, and accused the proprietors of these establishments the 'talented sisterhood'of being mere 'educational pretenders'.\",\"PeriodicalId\":347655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Melbourne Studies in Education\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Melbourne Studies in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17508480109556377\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melbourne Studies in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17508480109556377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

1871年9月,墨尔本大学(University of Melbourne)的教授委员会(一个全是男性的机构)宣布,“人们普遍认为,女孩的教育与男孩的教育的区别在于质量的模糊和脆弱。”虽然委员会没有提供任何证据来支持这一说法,但它对维多利亚州向女孩提供的教育标准不屑一顾的看法并不是唯一的。就在几个月前,殖民地主要报纸《阿古斯报》的编辑还对私立女子学校糟糕的学费状况表示遗憾,并指责这些学校的老板们“才华横溢的姐妹们”只不过是“教育的伪装者”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Female entrants to the university of Melbourne's matriculation examination, 1871–1881
In September 1871, the Professorial Board of the University of Melbourne an allmale body declared it 'is a general opinion that the education of girls is distinguished from that of boys by a vagueness and flimsiness of quality.' While the Board offered no evidence to support this claim, its dismissive view of the standard of education offered to girls in Victoria was not unique. Only a few months earlier the editor of the colony's leading newspaper the Argus, had bemoaned the poor state of tuition offered in private girls' schools, and accused the proprietors of these establishments the 'talented sisterhood'of being mere 'educational pretenders'.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信