越宽越好?基于不同COTS-RF技术的无接触振动传感

Zhe Chen, Tianyue Zheng, Chao Cai, Yue-Xing Gao, Pengfei Hu, Jun Luo
{"title":"越宽越好?基于不同COTS-RF技术的无接触振动传感","authors":"Zhe Chen, Tianyue Zheng, Chao Cai, Yue-Xing Gao, Pengfei Hu, Jun Luo","doi":"10.1109/INFOCOM53939.2023.10229035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vibration sensing is crucial to human life and work, as vibrations indicate the status of their respective sources (e.g., heartbeat to human health condition). Given the inconvenience of contact sensing, both academia and industry have been intensively exploring contact-free vibration sensing, with several major developments leveraging radio-frequency (RF) technologies made very recently. However, a measurement study systematically comparing these options is still missing. In this paper, we choose to evaluate five representative commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) RF technologies with different carrier frequencies, bandwidths, and waveform designs. We first unify the sensing data format and processing pipeline, and also propose a novel metric v-SNR to quantify sensing quality. Then our extensive evaluations start from controlled experiments for benchmarking, followed by investigations on two real-world applications: machinery vibration measurement and vital sign monitoring. Our comprehensive study reveals that Wi-Fi performs the worst among all five technologies, while a lesser-known UWB-based technology achieves the best overall performance, and others have respective pros and cons in different scenarios.","PeriodicalId":387707,"journal":{"name":"IEEE INFOCOM 2023 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wider is Better? Contact-free Vibration Sensing via Different COTS-RF Technologies\",\"authors\":\"Zhe Chen, Tianyue Zheng, Chao Cai, Yue-Xing Gao, Pengfei Hu, Jun Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INFOCOM53939.2023.10229035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Vibration sensing is crucial to human life and work, as vibrations indicate the status of their respective sources (e.g., heartbeat to human health condition). Given the inconvenience of contact sensing, both academia and industry have been intensively exploring contact-free vibration sensing, with several major developments leveraging radio-frequency (RF) technologies made very recently. However, a measurement study systematically comparing these options is still missing. In this paper, we choose to evaluate five representative commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) RF technologies with different carrier frequencies, bandwidths, and waveform designs. We first unify the sensing data format and processing pipeline, and also propose a novel metric v-SNR to quantify sensing quality. Then our extensive evaluations start from controlled experiments for benchmarking, followed by investigations on two real-world applications: machinery vibration measurement and vital sign monitoring. Our comprehensive study reveals that Wi-Fi performs the worst among all five technologies, while a lesser-known UWB-based technology achieves the best overall performance, and others have respective pros and cons in different scenarios.\",\"PeriodicalId\":387707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE INFOCOM 2023 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE INFOCOM 2023 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOM53939.2023.10229035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE INFOCOM 2023 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOM53939.2023.10229035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

振动传感对人类的生活和工作至关重要,因为振动表明其各自来源的状态(例如,心跳到人类健康状况)。鉴于接触式传感的不便,学术界和工业界都在深入探索无接触振动传感,最近利用射频(RF)技术取得了几项重大进展。然而,一项系统比较这些选择的测量研究仍然缺失。在本文中,我们选择评估五种具有不同载波频率,带宽和波形设计的代表性商用现货(COTS)射频技术。我们首先统一了传感数据格式和处理流程,并提出了一种新的度量v-SNR来量化传感质量。然后,我们从基准控制实验开始进行广泛的评估,然后对两个实际应用进行调查:机械振动测量和生命体征监测。我们的综合研究表明,Wi-Fi在所有五种技术中表现最差,而一种鲜为人知的基于uwb的技术实现了最佳的整体性能,而其他技术在不同的场景下各有优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wider is Better? Contact-free Vibration Sensing via Different COTS-RF Technologies
Vibration sensing is crucial to human life and work, as vibrations indicate the status of their respective sources (e.g., heartbeat to human health condition). Given the inconvenience of contact sensing, both academia and industry have been intensively exploring contact-free vibration sensing, with several major developments leveraging radio-frequency (RF) technologies made very recently. However, a measurement study systematically comparing these options is still missing. In this paper, we choose to evaluate five representative commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) RF technologies with different carrier frequencies, bandwidths, and waveform designs. We first unify the sensing data format and processing pipeline, and also propose a novel metric v-SNR to quantify sensing quality. Then our extensive evaluations start from controlled experiments for benchmarking, followed by investigations on two real-world applications: machinery vibration measurement and vital sign monitoring. Our comprehensive study reveals that Wi-Fi performs the worst among all five technologies, while a lesser-known UWB-based technology achieves the best overall performance, and others have respective pros and cons in different scenarios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信