{"title":"N","authors":"K. Boyd","doi":"10.4324/9780203825556-79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"MR0109315 (22 #201) 52.00 Birch, B. J. On 3N points in a plane. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 55 (1959), 289–293. The following theorem is proved in this note. Theorem 1: Given 3N points in a plane, we can divide them into N triads such that, when we form a triangle with the points of each triad the N triangles will all have a common point. The proof is given on the basis of three lemmas and two corollaries. The first two lemmas are the fixed-point theorem for n-space and Caratheodory’s (n + 1)point theorem. Lemma 3 is as follows, where E is the unit n-ball: Let a mass distribution in E be defined by an integrable density function ρ(x); then we can find a point r inside E so that every closed half-space with r on its boundary will contain at least 1/(n+ 1) of the total mass. The first corollary states that Lemma 3 holds if the mass-distribution is not continuous, and the second corollary is as follows: Let Y be a finite set consisting of M points in n-space, and suppose that M > (n + 1)R. Then there is a point common to all the closed half-spaces which contain at least (M −R) points of Y . {The author states that he believes Lemma 3 is new. Actually the most important new feature concerns the number and dispositions of closed half-spaces containing an “optimal” portion of the mass stated in the proof. For the Lemma 3 itself, it may be interpreted as a corollary of the finite point-mass problem which is a straight-forward generalization to n-space of a theorem stated and proved in Jaglom and Boltjanski [Konvexe Figuren, VEB Deutscher Verlag, Berlin, 1955; MR0079789; p. 16], where they also observe that the continuous case is special. To prove Theorem 1, then, the author could have applied his proof directly to the theorem stated by Jaglom and Boltjanski. However, the procedure used and the application of the method to other problems of optimization are of further interest.} P. C. Hammer From MathSciNet, August 2022","PeriodicalId":131699,"journal":{"name":"Encyclopedia of Historians and Historical Writing","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"N\",\"authors\":\"K. Boyd\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780203825556-79\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"MR0109315 (22 #201) 52.00 Birch, B. J. On 3N points in a plane. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 55 (1959), 289–293. The following theorem is proved in this note. Theorem 1: Given 3N points in a plane, we can divide them into N triads such that, when we form a triangle with the points of each triad the N triangles will all have a common point. The proof is given on the basis of three lemmas and two corollaries. The first two lemmas are the fixed-point theorem for n-space and Caratheodory’s (n + 1)point theorem. Lemma 3 is as follows, where E is the unit n-ball: Let a mass distribution in E be defined by an integrable density function ρ(x); then we can find a point r inside E so that every closed half-space with r on its boundary will contain at least 1/(n+ 1) of the total mass. The first corollary states that Lemma 3 holds if the mass-distribution is not continuous, and the second corollary is as follows: Let Y be a finite set consisting of M points in n-space, and suppose that M > (n + 1)R. Then there is a point common to all the closed half-spaces which contain at least (M −R) points of Y . {The author states that he believes Lemma 3 is new. Actually the most important new feature concerns the number and dispositions of closed half-spaces containing an “optimal” portion of the mass stated in the proof. For the Lemma 3 itself, it may be interpreted as a corollary of the finite point-mass problem which is a straight-forward generalization to n-space of a theorem stated and proved in Jaglom and Boltjanski [Konvexe Figuren, VEB Deutscher Verlag, Berlin, 1955; MR0079789; p. 16], where they also observe that the continuous case is special. To prove Theorem 1, then, the author could have applied his proof directly to the theorem stated by Jaglom and Boltjanski. However, the procedure used and the application of the method to other problems of optimization are of further interest.} P. C. Hammer From MathSciNet, August 2022\",\"PeriodicalId\":131699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Encyclopedia of Historians and Historical Writing\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Encyclopedia of Historians and Historical Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203825556-79\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Encyclopedia of Historians and Historical Writing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203825556-79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Birch, B. J.平面上的3N个点。《剑桥哲学学会论文集》55(1959),289-293。下面的定理在本笔记中得到了证明。定理1:给定平面上的3N个点,我们可以将它们分成N个三角,这样当我们用每个三角的点组成一个三角形时,N个三角形都有一个公共点。这个证明是根据三个引理和两个推论给出的。前两个引理是n空间的不动点定理和Caratheodory的(n + 1)点定理。引理3如下,其中E是单位n球:设E中的质量分布由可积密度函数ρ(x)定义;那么我们就可以在E里面找到一个点r,这样每个边界上有r的封闭半空间至少包含总质量的1/(n+ 1)第一个推论表明,如果质量分布不连续,则引理3成立,第二个推论如下:设Y是n空间中由M个点组成的有限集合,并设M > (n + 1)R。那么在所有包含至少(M−R)个Y点的闭半空间中存在一个公共点。{作者声明他认为引理3是新的。实际上,最重要的新特征与包含证明中所述质量的“最佳”部分的封闭半空间的数量和配置有关。对于引理3本身,它可以被解释为有限点质量问题的一个推论,该问题是Jaglom和Boltjanski [Konvexe Figuren, VEB Deutscher Verlag, Berlin, 1955]中陈述和证明的一个定理对n空间的直接推广。MR0079789;第16页],他们也观察到连续的情况是特殊的。因此,为了证明定理1,作者可以将他的证明直接应用于Jaglom和Boltjanski所述的定理。然而,所使用的程序和该方法在其他优化问题中的应用值得进一步研究。P. C. Hammer来自MathSciNet, 2022年8月
MR0109315 (22 #201) 52.00 Birch, B. J. On 3N points in a plane. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 55 (1959), 289–293. The following theorem is proved in this note. Theorem 1: Given 3N points in a plane, we can divide them into N triads such that, when we form a triangle with the points of each triad the N triangles will all have a common point. The proof is given on the basis of three lemmas and two corollaries. The first two lemmas are the fixed-point theorem for n-space and Caratheodory’s (n + 1)point theorem. Lemma 3 is as follows, where E is the unit n-ball: Let a mass distribution in E be defined by an integrable density function ρ(x); then we can find a point r inside E so that every closed half-space with r on its boundary will contain at least 1/(n+ 1) of the total mass. The first corollary states that Lemma 3 holds if the mass-distribution is not continuous, and the second corollary is as follows: Let Y be a finite set consisting of M points in n-space, and suppose that M > (n + 1)R. Then there is a point common to all the closed half-spaces which contain at least (M −R) points of Y . {The author states that he believes Lemma 3 is new. Actually the most important new feature concerns the number and dispositions of closed half-spaces containing an “optimal” portion of the mass stated in the proof. For the Lemma 3 itself, it may be interpreted as a corollary of the finite point-mass problem which is a straight-forward generalization to n-space of a theorem stated and proved in Jaglom and Boltjanski [Konvexe Figuren, VEB Deutscher Verlag, Berlin, 1955; MR0079789; p. 16], where they also observe that the continuous case is special. To prove Theorem 1, then, the author could have applied his proof directly to the theorem stated by Jaglom and Boltjanski. However, the procedure used and the application of the method to other problems of optimization are of further interest.} P. C. Hammer From MathSciNet, August 2022