工程职能部门的教育

Edward Bennett
{"title":"工程职能部门的教育","authors":"Edward Bennett","doi":"10.1109/JOAIEE.1923.6591525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The functional divisions of engineering are considered to be those functional divisions found within the highly organized industrial organizations, — namely, research, design, supervision (of physical plant and of physical and chemical processes), management (of labor and business features) and engineering sales. To provide a background for the discussion of the proposed reorganization of the engineering courses along these functional lines, the features of the existing engineering courses are first presented and briefly discussed. It is pointed out that the existing courses, while intended to provide a broad foundation for engineering work in general, are each intended to provide a more thorough and specific foundation for work in some one of the industrial divisions of the engineering field. The grounds for selection between the existing engineering courses are then discussed. The question is discussed as to whether the student and his counselors would not be required to consider and to choose between the more basic types of engineering if each major engineering course were laid out to provide the best foundation for one of the functional divisions of the engineering field. The general features of the proposed functional courses are discussed and contrasted with those of the existing courses. The need for more than one type of treatment of many of the subjects is presented and the conclusion is drawn that the distinctive general feature of the functional engineering courses should be the separate provision for the needs of men of superior aptitude and for those of moderate aptitude by profoundly technical and moderately technical treatments of the different branches of science, particularly of the mathematics and physics of the first two years. The distinctive features of each of the functional engineering courses and the conditions of transfer from one to the other are discussed. The merits and possibilities of a method of determining the student's aptitude for the work in an engineering college before enrolling him in the college, by requiring him to report before the opening of the school year for a month of work and counsel with mature educators, are pointed out. The closing discussion relates to the relative parts played by survey courses and by profoundly technical courses in the development of clear, trustworthy breadth of vision.","PeriodicalId":268640,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1923-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Education for the functional divisions of engineering\",\"authors\":\"Edward Bennett\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/JOAIEE.1923.6591525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The functional divisions of engineering are considered to be those functional divisions found within the highly organized industrial organizations, — namely, research, design, supervision (of physical plant and of physical and chemical processes), management (of labor and business features) and engineering sales. To provide a background for the discussion of the proposed reorganization of the engineering courses along these functional lines, the features of the existing engineering courses are first presented and briefly discussed. It is pointed out that the existing courses, while intended to provide a broad foundation for engineering work in general, are each intended to provide a more thorough and specific foundation for work in some one of the industrial divisions of the engineering field. The grounds for selection between the existing engineering courses are then discussed. The question is discussed as to whether the student and his counselors would not be required to consider and to choose between the more basic types of engineering if each major engineering course were laid out to provide the best foundation for one of the functional divisions of the engineering field. The general features of the proposed functional courses are discussed and contrasted with those of the existing courses. The need for more than one type of treatment of many of the subjects is presented and the conclusion is drawn that the distinctive general feature of the functional engineering courses should be the separate provision for the needs of men of superior aptitude and for those of moderate aptitude by profoundly technical and moderately technical treatments of the different branches of science, particularly of the mathematics and physics of the first two years. The distinctive features of each of the functional engineering courses and the conditions of transfer from one to the other are discussed. The merits and possibilities of a method of determining the student's aptitude for the work in an engineering college before enrolling him in the college, by requiring him to report before the opening of the school year for a month of work and counsel with mature educators, are pointed out. The closing discussion relates to the relative parts played by survey courses and by profoundly technical courses in the development of clear, trustworthy breadth of vision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":268640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1923-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/JOAIEE.1923.6591525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/JOAIEE.1923.6591525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

工程的职能部门被认为是在高度组织化的工业组织中发现的那些职能部门,即研究、设计、监督(物理工厂和物理和化学过程)、管理(劳动力和业务特征)和工程销售。为了提供一个背景,讨论拟议的重组工程课程沿着这些功能线,现有的工程课程的特点,首先提出并简要讨论。有人指出,现有的课程虽然旨在为一般的工程工作提供广泛的基础,但每门课程都旨在为工程领域的某些工业部门的工作提供更彻底和具体的基础。然后讨论了在现有工程课程之间进行选择的理由。讨论的问题是,如果每门主要的工程课程都是为工程领域的一个功能部门提供最好的基础,那么学生和他的辅导员是否不需要考虑和选择更基本的工程类型。讨论了功能课程的总体特点,并与现有课程进行了对比。提出了对许多科目进行多种类型的处理的需要,并得出结论,功能工程课程的独特的一般特征应该是通过对不同科学分支,特别是前两年的数学和物理进行深刻的技术和中等技术处理,为具有优越能力的人和具有中等能力的人的需要提供单独的规定。讨论了各功能工程课程的特点,以及从一门课程转到另一门课程的条件。指出了在工程学院入学之前,要求学生在开学前报到一个月,并与成熟的教育工作者进行协商,以确定学生是否适合工作的方法的优点和可行性。最后的讨论涉及到调查课程和深度技术课程在发展清晰、可靠的视野广度方面所起的相关作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Education for the functional divisions of engineering
The functional divisions of engineering are considered to be those functional divisions found within the highly organized industrial organizations, — namely, research, design, supervision (of physical plant and of physical and chemical processes), management (of labor and business features) and engineering sales. To provide a background for the discussion of the proposed reorganization of the engineering courses along these functional lines, the features of the existing engineering courses are first presented and briefly discussed. It is pointed out that the existing courses, while intended to provide a broad foundation for engineering work in general, are each intended to provide a more thorough and specific foundation for work in some one of the industrial divisions of the engineering field. The grounds for selection between the existing engineering courses are then discussed. The question is discussed as to whether the student and his counselors would not be required to consider and to choose between the more basic types of engineering if each major engineering course were laid out to provide the best foundation for one of the functional divisions of the engineering field. The general features of the proposed functional courses are discussed and contrasted with those of the existing courses. The need for more than one type of treatment of many of the subjects is presented and the conclusion is drawn that the distinctive general feature of the functional engineering courses should be the separate provision for the needs of men of superior aptitude and for those of moderate aptitude by profoundly technical and moderately technical treatments of the different branches of science, particularly of the mathematics and physics of the first two years. The distinctive features of each of the functional engineering courses and the conditions of transfer from one to the other are discussed. The merits and possibilities of a method of determining the student's aptitude for the work in an engineering college before enrolling him in the college, by requiring him to report before the opening of the school year for a month of work and counsel with mature educators, are pointed out. The closing discussion relates to the relative parts played by survey courses and by profoundly technical courses in the development of clear, trustworthy breadth of vision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信