{"title":"来自边疆:国家有罪不罚和跨界集体行动","authors":"K. Staudt","doi":"10.1177/1522637917707209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jeannine Relly and Celeste González de Bustamante have woven together multiple literatures in theoretically informed scholarship to analyze one of the most important challenges for the contemporary global world: the human rights and security of those involved in disseminating news analyses, so essential to democratic accountability. Given their binational perspectives, I respond with grassroots borderlands perspectives on the challenges and on an essential but understudied element in our globalized world, that of cross-border collective action among nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). Alas, all too little research exists in this area, so the authors are to be commended for their complex analysis that moves understanding and action forward. In this essay, I unpack the United States, Mexico, and the in-between spaces in the borderlands, and changing contexts. I highlight the ways that the United States and its policies share some responsibility for the problems that the authors outline, particularly the longest running war ever, the War on Drugs, which incentivizes suppliers and their collaborators to behave brutally to gain enormous profits from the huge U.S. market and suppress news about their dastardly deeds. The monograph is useful to students, scholars, and activists not only for its deep knowledge of Mexico but also for possible replication elsewhere in other parts of the world. Using a comprehensive and a highly credible, in-depth mixed-methods approach, the authors interviewed a purposive sample of 33 people from five different types of relevant organizations. Having methodically analyzed the stages associated with human organizing for concrete change, their findings about ambivalent outcomes can only leave readers wondering about the ability and willingness of the Mexican government to implement its “Protection Measures” for journalists facing threats. While the murders and disappearances of journalists have gone down since new instruments were put into place, the number of reports of threats and assaults is increasing. Perhaps an even bigger framework is in order, one that draws in the United States and U.S. policies, as well as people active in cross-border solidarity.","PeriodicalId":147592,"journal":{"name":"Journalism & Mass Communication Monographs","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From the Borderlands: State Impunity and Cross-Border Collective Action\",\"authors\":\"K. Staudt\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1522637917707209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Jeannine Relly and Celeste González de Bustamante have woven together multiple literatures in theoretically informed scholarship to analyze one of the most important challenges for the contemporary global world: the human rights and security of those involved in disseminating news analyses, so essential to democratic accountability. Given their binational perspectives, I respond with grassroots borderlands perspectives on the challenges and on an essential but understudied element in our globalized world, that of cross-border collective action among nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). Alas, all too little research exists in this area, so the authors are to be commended for their complex analysis that moves understanding and action forward. In this essay, I unpack the United States, Mexico, and the in-between spaces in the borderlands, and changing contexts. I highlight the ways that the United States and its policies share some responsibility for the problems that the authors outline, particularly the longest running war ever, the War on Drugs, which incentivizes suppliers and their collaborators to behave brutally to gain enormous profits from the huge U.S. market and suppress news about their dastardly deeds. The monograph is useful to students, scholars, and activists not only for its deep knowledge of Mexico but also for possible replication elsewhere in other parts of the world. Using a comprehensive and a highly credible, in-depth mixed-methods approach, the authors interviewed a purposive sample of 33 people from five different types of relevant organizations. Having methodically analyzed the stages associated with human organizing for concrete change, their findings about ambivalent outcomes can only leave readers wondering about the ability and willingness of the Mexican government to implement its “Protection Measures” for journalists facing threats. While the murders and disappearances of journalists have gone down since new instruments were put into place, the number of reports of threats and assaults is increasing. Perhaps an even bigger framework is in order, one that draws in the United States and U.S. policies, as well as people active in cross-border solidarity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":147592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journalism & Mass Communication Monographs\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journalism & Mass Communication Monographs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1522637917707209\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journalism & Mass Communication Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1522637917707209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Jeannine Relly和Celeste González de Bustamante在理论知识的学术研究中结合了多种文献来分析当代全球世界最重要的挑战之一:参与传播新闻分析的人的人权和安全,这对民主问责制至关重要。鉴于他们的两国视角,我将以草根边境人的视角来回应这些挑战,以及我们全球化世界中一个重要但尚未得到充分研究的因素,即非政府组织(ngo)之间的跨境集体行动。唉,这个领域的研究太少了,所以作者们的复杂分析推动了人们的理解和行动,值得称赞。在这篇文章中,我剖析了美国、墨西哥和边境地带的中间地带,以及不断变化的语境。我强调了美国及其政策对作者概述的问题负有一定责任的方式,特别是有史以来持续时间最长的战争,毒品战争,它激励供应商及其合作者采取残酷行为,从巨大的美国市场中获得巨额利润,并压制有关他们卑鄙行为的新闻。这本专著对学生、学者和活动人士都很有用,不仅因为它对墨西哥的深入了解,还因为它有可能在世界其他地方复制。作者采用全面、高度可信、深入的混合方法,采访了来自五种不同类型的相关组织的33名有目的的样本。在系统地分析了人类组织具体变革的相关阶段后,他们关于矛盾结果的发现只会让读者怀疑墨西哥政府对面临威胁的记者实施“保护措施”的能力和意愿。自从实施新手段以来,记者被谋杀和失踪的情况有所减少,但有关威胁和攻击的报告数量却在增加。也许一个更大的框架正在形成,它将美国和美国的政策,以及积极参与跨境团结的人们都纳入其中。
From the Borderlands: State Impunity and Cross-Border Collective Action
Jeannine Relly and Celeste González de Bustamante have woven together multiple literatures in theoretically informed scholarship to analyze one of the most important challenges for the contemporary global world: the human rights and security of those involved in disseminating news analyses, so essential to democratic accountability. Given their binational perspectives, I respond with grassroots borderlands perspectives on the challenges and on an essential but understudied element in our globalized world, that of cross-border collective action among nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). Alas, all too little research exists in this area, so the authors are to be commended for their complex analysis that moves understanding and action forward. In this essay, I unpack the United States, Mexico, and the in-between spaces in the borderlands, and changing contexts. I highlight the ways that the United States and its policies share some responsibility for the problems that the authors outline, particularly the longest running war ever, the War on Drugs, which incentivizes suppliers and their collaborators to behave brutally to gain enormous profits from the huge U.S. market and suppress news about their dastardly deeds. The monograph is useful to students, scholars, and activists not only for its deep knowledge of Mexico but also for possible replication elsewhere in other parts of the world. Using a comprehensive and a highly credible, in-depth mixed-methods approach, the authors interviewed a purposive sample of 33 people from five different types of relevant organizations. Having methodically analyzed the stages associated with human organizing for concrete change, their findings about ambivalent outcomes can only leave readers wondering about the ability and willingness of the Mexican government to implement its “Protection Measures” for journalists facing threats. While the murders and disappearances of journalists have gone down since new instruments were put into place, the number of reports of threats and assaults is increasing. Perhaps an even bigger framework is in order, one that draws in the United States and U.S. policies, as well as people active in cross-border solidarity.