尽管专利权人在事实审口头辩论结束前没有提出修改抗辩，之后，以专利法104条第4第3号规定的应更正权利要求的审决等确定为理由，对事实审的判断是否许可进行争辩。最高裁判所平成29年月10日第二小法庭判决民集71卷6号861页侵害专利权等请求事件(切片事件最高裁判所判决)

{"title":"尽管专利权人在事实审口头辩论结束前没有提出修改抗辩，之后，以专利法104条第4第3号规定的应更正权利要求的审决等确定为理由，对事实审的判断是否许可进行争辩。最高裁判所平成29年月10日第二小法庭判决民集71卷6号861页侵害专利权等请求事件(切片事件最高裁判所判决)","authors":"Fumio Miyanaga","doi":"10.15027/47640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":364863,"journal":{"name":"The Hiroshima law journal","volume":"39 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"特許権者が，事実審の口頭弁論終結時までに訂正の再抗弁を主張しなかったにもかかわらず，その後に特許法104条の4第3号所定の特許請求の範囲の訂正をすべき旨の審決等が確定したことを理由に事実審の判断を争うことの許否 : 最高裁判所平成29年月10日第二小法廷判決 民集71巻6号861頁 特許権侵害差止等請求事件（シートカッター事件最高裁判決）\",\"authors\":\"Fumio Miyanaga\",\"doi\":\"10.15027/47640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":364863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Hiroshima law journal\",\"volume\":\"39 4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Hiroshima law journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15027/47640\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Hiroshima law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15027/47640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}