Analysis of Implementation of Profit Sharing Agreement in Rice Fields Cultivation: Case Study at Gampong Blang Krueng Baitussalam, Aceh Besar

: Article 3 Act Number 2 Year 1960 concerning the Profit Sharing Agreement stated that an agreement with any name must be in writing in front of head of the village and presented by two witnesses from both parties and legalized by the authorized officials. The profit sharing in rice fields’ cultivation at Blang Krueng was carried out verbally. This essay has three aims, firstly to explain why the community made the profit sharing agreement orally. Secondly to explain the agreement system for the profit sharing at Blang Krueng and third is to explain the obstacles in implementing the profit sharing system at Blang Krueng. This is an empiric juridical research by collecting data through observation and interview then analyse them to draw conclusion. The results showed that the community made profit sharing agreement verbally because it had been done for generations and most of the community didn’t know Law No. 2 Year 1960. The distribution system uses 2 variations, namely 1:3, one for the owner and three for the cultivator. 1:4, one for the owner and four for the cultivator. The impediment for the community in implementing this profit sharing is dissenting opinion among them regarding the profit sharing distribution. Therefore, it is suggested that the community at Blang Krueng to make the profit sharing agreement in the form of writing with the presence of an authorized person in the village and presented by two witnesses from both parties so that when the dispute arise the evidence will be vigorous.