{"title":"监管比特币:税收案例研究","authors":"Margaret Ryznar","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3402260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter adapts the Coffee bonding theory to the modern context of bitcoin, using tax as a case study. As the theory predicts, tax authorities may be able to increase the legitimacy of bitcoin by improving tax compliance and reducing tax evasion. Thus, while the Coffee theory arose two decades ago to explain the cross-listing of foreign company shares, it has implications for the modern context of bitcoin.","PeriodicalId":128369,"journal":{"name":"CompSciRN: Other Cybersecurity","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulating Bitcoin: A Tax Case Study\",\"authors\":\"Margaret Ryznar\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3402260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter adapts the Coffee bonding theory to the modern context of bitcoin, using tax as a case study. As the theory predicts, tax authorities may be able to increase the legitimacy of bitcoin by improving tax compliance and reducing tax evasion. Thus, while the Coffee theory arose two decades ago to explain the cross-listing of foreign company shares, it has implications for the modern context of bitcoin.\",\"PeriodicalId\":128369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CompSciRN: Other Cybersecurity\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CompSciRN: Other Cybersecurity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3402260\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CompSciRN: Other Cybersecurity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3402260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This chapter adapts the Coffee bonding theory to the modern context of bitcoin, using tax as a case study. As the theory predicts, tax authorities may be able to increase the legitimacy of bitcoin by improving tax compliance and reducing tax evasion. Thus, while the Coffee theory arose two decades ago to explain the cross-listing of foreign company shares, it has implications for the modern context of bitcoin.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
