H&E染色图像转移自动检测的深度学习模型比较研究

Bilal Ahmad, Sun Jun, Jinxing Li, Bai Lidan
{"title":"H&E染色图像转移自动检测的深度学习模型比较研究","authors":"Bilal Ahmad, Sun Jun, Jinxing Li, Bai Lidan","doi":"10.1109/ICCIS54243.2021.9676187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deep learning has gained the attention of researchers around the world. We used several deep learning models to check whether they could potentially be used as a clinical utility by pathologists to detect lymph node metastases in tissue sections of women with breast cancer to save time and reduce the burden on healthcare. For that purpose, we selected three deep learning models of different depths. The deepest one (DenseNet201), medium depth (Resent50), lightweight (Mobie/Net) and trained them in different experiments under various hyperparameters settings from scratch. The test set consists of 32000 histopathological images. We used absolute accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score as a performance measure. Apart from these measures, we observe the effect of data augmentation and the number of epochs on the classification performance. We achieved an average accuracy of 85.6%, 87.5%, and 88.4% for MobileNet V1, ResNet50, and DenseNet201, respectively, which further improves to 91.1 %, 93.8%, and 95.7%, respectively, when augmented images are used in the training set. The performance of all deep learning models was on par with that of expert pathologists reported in different studies. We may expect that deep learning could be an exceptional utility for clinicians in real-time diagnosis too.","PeriodicalId":165673,"journal":{"name":"2021 4th International Conference on Computing & Information Sciences (ICCIS)","volume":"83 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Deep Learning Models For Automatic Detection of Metastases in H&E Stained Images\",\"authors\":\"Bilal Ahmad, Sun Jun, Jinxing Li, Bai Lidan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCIS54243.2021.9676187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Deep learning has gained the attention of researchers around the world. We used several deep learning models to check whether they could potentially be used as a clinical utility by pathologists to detect lymph node metastases in tissue sections of women with breast cancer to save time and reduce the burden on healthcare. For that purpose, we selected three deep learning models of different depths. The deepest one (DenseNet201), medium depth (Resent50), lightweight (Mobie/Net) and trained them in different experiments under various hyperparameters settings from scratch. The test set consists of 32000 histopathological images. We used absolute accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score as a performance measure. Apart from these measures, we observe the effect of data augmentation and the number of epochs on the classification performance. We achieved an average accuracy of 85.6%, 87.5%, and 88.4% for MobileNet V1, ResNet50, and DenseNet201, respectively, which further improves to 91.1 %, 93.8%, and 95.7%, respectively, when augmented images are used in the training set. The performance of all deep learning models was on par with that of expert pathologists reported in different studies. We may expect that deep learning could be an exceptional utility for clinicians in real-time diagnosis too.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 4th International Conference on Computing & Information Sciences (ICCIS)\",\"volume\":\"83 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 4th International Conference on Computing & Information Sciences (ICCIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIS54243.2021.9676187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 4th International Conference on Computing & Information Sciences (ICCIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIS54243.2021.9676187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

深度学习已经引起了世界各地研究人员的关注。我们使用了几个深度学习模型来检查它们是否可能被病理学家用作临床实用工具,以检测乳腺癌妇女组织切片中的淋巴结转移,从而节省时间并减轻医疗保健负担。为此,我们选择了三个不同深度的深度学习模型。最深的(DenseNet201)、中等深度的(rencent50)、轻量级的(Mobie/Net),从零开始在不同的超参数设置下进行不同的实验训练。测试集由32000张组织病理图像组成。我们使用绝对准确性、灵敏度、特异性和f1评分作为性能衡量标准。除了这些度量外,我们还观察了数据扩充和epoch数对分类性能的影响。MobileNet V1, ResNet50和DenseNet201的平均准确率分别为85.6%,87.5%和88.4%,当在训练集中使用增强图像时,我们的平均准确率分别提高到91.1%,93.8%和95.7%。所有深度学习模型的表现与不同研究中报告的专家病理学家的表现相当。我们可以期待,深度学习在临床医生的实时诊断中也能发挥特殊的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study of Deep Learning Models For Automatic Detection of Metastases in H&E Stained Images
Deep learning has gained the attention of researchers around the world. We used several deep learning models to check whether they could potentially be used as a clinical utility by pathologists to detect lymph node metastases in tissue sections of women with breast cancer to save time and reduce the burden on healthcare. For that purpose, we selected three deep learning models of different depths. The deepest one (DenseNet201), medium depth (Resent50), lightweight (Mobie/Net) and trained them in different experiments under various hyperparameters settings from scratch. The test set consists of 32000 histopathological images. We used absolute accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score as a performance measure. Apart from these measures, we observe the effect of data augmentation and the number of epochs on the classification performance. We achieved an average accuracy of 85.6%, 87.5%, and 88.4% for MobileNet V1, ResNet50, and DenseNet201, respectively, which further improves to 91.1 %, 93.8%, and 95.7%, respectively, when augmented images are used in the training set. The performance of all deep learning models was on par with that of expert pathologists reported in different studies. We may expect that deep learning could be an exceptional utility for clinicians in real-time diagnosis too.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信