以越南人韩国语学习者为对象的SILL问题分析及因素分析研究

홍종명
{"title":"以越南人韩国语学习者为对象的SILL问题分析及因素分析研究","authors":"홍종명","doi":"10.21485/hufsea.2017.27.2.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the patterns of Korean language learning strategy of Vietnamese students. Oxford (1990) ''s SILL was used for item analysis and factor analysis, and the results were analyzed in various angles. \nFirst, item analysis shows that specific subcategory strategies are used in each strategy category. In the memory strategy, the cognitive - mediated strategy was used mainly and the practice and utilization strategy was preferred in cognitive strategy category. \nIn compensation strategy, alternative strategy was actively used rather than analogical strategy, and it was confirmed that strategies for learning and coordination were actively used in metacognitive strategies that manage learning process as a whole. In affective strategy, encouragement and reward related strategies were used extensively. In social strategy, the use of interrogative strategy was shown to be passive in comparison with strategies to cooperate with others. \nIn the result of factor analysis, social strategy category was excluded. One item was removed from the cognitive strategy and the compensation strategy, and they were reconstructed as a new factor of ''comprehension strategy''. \nThe rest of the strategy categories are the same as the existing categories. This is different from previous studies in which various factors are reconstructed, and it can be interpreted that Vietnamese learners have a tendency to be explained by existing SILL category. The results of this study can be used as basic data for Korean learners of Vietnamese learners.","PeriodicalId":206569,"journal":{"name":"Southeast Asia Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"베트남인 한국어 학습자 대상 SILL 문항분석 및 요인분석 연구\",\"authors\":\"홍종명\",\"doi\":\"10.21485/hufsea.2017.27.2.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigated the patterns of Korean language learning strategy of Vietnamese students. Oxford (1990) ''s SILL was used for item analysis and factor analysis, and the results were analyzed in various angles. \\nFirst, item analysis shows that specific subcategory strategies are used in each strategy category. In the memory strategy, the cognitive - mediated strategy was used mainly and the practice and utilization strategy was preferred in cognitive strategy category. \\nIn compensation strategy, alternative strategy was actively used rather than analogical strategy, and it was confirmed that strategies for learning and coordination were actively used in metacognitive strategies that manage learning process as a whole. In affective strategy, encouragement and reward related strategies were used extensively. In social strategy, the use of interrogative strategy was shown to be passive in comparison with strategies to cooperate with others. \\nIn the result of factor analysis, social strategy category was excluded. One item was removed from the cognitive strategy and the compensation strategy, and they were reconstructed as a new factor of ''comprehension strategy''. \\nThe rest of the strategy categories are the same as the existing categories. This is different from previous studies in which various factors are reconstructed, and it can be interpreted that Vietnamese learners have a tendency to be explained by existing SILL category. The results of this study can be used as basic data for Korean learners of Vietnamese learners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southeast Asia Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southeast Asia Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21485/hufsea.2017.27.2.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southeast Asia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21485/hufsea.2017.27.2.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨越南学生的韩语学习策略模式。牛津大学(1990)采用SILL量表进行项目分析和因子分析,并对结果进行多角度分析。首先,项目分析表明,每个策略类别中都使用了特定的子类别策略。记忆策略以认知介导策略为主,认知策略以实践和利用策略为主。在补偿策略中,替代策略被积极使用,而不是类比策略,并且证实了学习和协调策略在管理学习过程的元认知策略中被积极使用。在情感策略中,鼓励和奖励相关策略被广泛使用。在社交策略中,与合作策略相比,疑问策略的使用被证明是被动的。在因子分析结果中,社会策略类被排除在外。从认知策略和补偿策略中剔除一个项目,重构为“理解策略”的新因素。其余的战略类别与现有类别相同。这与以往的研究对各种因素进行重构不同,可以解释为越南学习者倾向于用现有的still类别来解释。本研究结果可作为越南语学习者的基础资料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
베트남인 한국어 학습자 대상 SILL 문항분석 및 요인분석 연구
This study investigated the patterns of Korean language learning strategy of Vietnamese students. Oxford (1990) ''s SILL was used for item analysis and factor analysis, and the results were analyzed in various angles. First, item analysis shows that specific subcategory strategies are used in each strategy category. In the memory strategy, the cognitive - mediated strategy was used mainly and the practice and utilization strategy was preferred in cognitive strategy category. In compensation strategy, alternative strategy was actively used rather than analogical strategy, and it was confirmed that strategies for learning and coordination were actively used in metacognitive strategies that manage learning process as a whole. In affective strategy, encouragement and reward related strategies were used extensively. In social strategy, the use of interrogative strategy was shown to be passive in comparison with strategies to cooperate with others. In the result of factor analysis, social strategy category was excluded. One item was removed from the cognitive strategy and the compensation strategy, and they were reconstructed as a new factor of ''comprehension strategy''. The rest of the strategy categories are the same as the existing categories. This is different from previous studies in which various factors are reconstructed, and it can be interpreted that Vietnamese learners have a tendency to be explained by existing SILL category. The results of this study can be used as basic data for Korean learners of Vietnamese learners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信