回答需求可追溯性问题

Arushi Gupta, Wentao Wang, Nan Niu, J. Savolainen
{"title":"回答需求可追溯性问题","authors":"Arushi Gupta, Wentao Wang, Nan Niu, J. Savolainen","doi":"10.1145/3183440.3195049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To understand requirements traceability in practice, we present a preliminary study of identifying questions from requirements repositories and examining their answering status. Investigating four open-source projects results in 733 requirements questions, among which 43% were answered successfully, 35% were answered unsuccessfully, and 22% were not answered at all. We evaluate the accuracy of using a state-of-the-art natural language processing tool to identify the requirements questions and illuminate automated ways to classify their answering status.","PeriodicalId":121436,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceeedings","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Answering the requirements traceability questions\",\"authors\":\"Arushi Gupta, Wentao Wang, Nan Niu, J. Savolainen\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3183440.3195049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To understand requirements traceability in practice, we present a preliminary study of identifying questions from requirements repositories and examining their answering status. Investigating four open-source projects results in 733 requirements questions, among which 43% were answered successfully, 35% were answered unsuccessfully, and 22% were not answered at all. We evaluate the accuracy of using a state-of-the-art natural language processing tool to identify the requirements questions and illuminate automated ways to classify their answering status.\",\"PeriodicalId\":121436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceeedings\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceeedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3183440.3195049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceeedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3183440.3195049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

为了在实践中理解需求的可追溯性,我们提出了从需求存储库中识别问题并检查其回答状态的初步研究。对四个开源项目的调查结果是733个需求问题,其中43%回答成功,35%回答不成功,22%根本没有回答。我们评估了使用最先进的自然语言处理工具来识别需求问题的准确性,并阐明了对其回答状态进行分类的自动化方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Answering the requirements traceability questions
To understand requirements traceability in practice, we present a preliminary study of identifying questions from requirements repositories and examining their answering status. Investigating four open-source projects results in 733 requirements questions, among which 43% were answered successfully, 35% were answered unsuccessfully, and 22% were not answered at all. We evaluate the accuracy of using a state-of-the-art natural language processing tool to identify the requirements questions and illuminate automated ways to classify their answering status.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信