过失雇用与罪犯改造:雇用前科犯,却逃避责任

T. Creed
{"title":"过失雇用与罪犯改造:雇用前科犯,却逃避责任","authors":"T. Creed","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1007280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the attached article, I seek to make two contributions. First, I argue that states should make negligent-hiring laws clear for employers, so they know when they may hire an ex-convict and avoid liability. Second, I argue that states should allow employers to refuse to hire ex-convicts based solely on their status as ex-convicts. Some articles and states - e.g., New York and Wisconsin - perpetuate the idea that state law should require employers to hire ex-convicts to help them reintegrate into society. I argue that if states made negligent-hiring law clear for employers, they would know when they could hire an ex-convict yet avoid liability and would thus be more likely to hire ex-convicts. So instead of states effectively forcing employers to hire ex-convicts, employers will be more likely to hire more ex-convicts when employers know what steps they can take to avoid a negligent-hiring suit.","PeriodicalId":372228,"journal":{"name":"Corrections & Sentencing Law & Policy eJournal","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Negligent Hiring and Criminal Rehabilitation: Employing Ex-Convicts, Yet Avoiding Liability\",\"authors\":\"T. Creed\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1007280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the attached article, I seek to make two contributions. First, I argue that states should make negligent-hiring laws clear for employers, so they know when they may hire an ex-convict and avoid liability. Second, I argue that states should allow employers to refuse to hire ex-convicts based solely on their status as ex-convicts. Some articles and states - e.g., New York and Wisconsin - perpetuate the idea that state law should require employers to hire ex-convicts to help them reintegrate into society. I argue that if states made negligent-hiring law clear for employers, they would know when they could hire an ex-convict yet avoid liability and would thus be more likely to hire ex-convicts. So instead of states effectively forcing employers to hire ex-convicts, employers will be more likely to hire more ex-convicts when employers know what steps they can take to avoid a negligent-hiring suit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":372228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corrections & Sentencing Law & Policy eJournal\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corrections & Sentencing Law & Policy eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1007280\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corrections & Sentencing Law & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1007280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

在所附文章中,我想提出两点意见。首先,我认为各州应该为雇主制定明确的过失雇佣法,这样他们就知道何时可以雇佣有前科的人并避免责任。其次,我认为各州应该允许雇主仅仅基于有前科的人的身份就拒绝雇佣他们。一些条款和州——例如纽约和威斯康辛——延续了州法律应该要求雇主雇佣有前科的人帮助他们重新融入社会的想法。我认为,如果各州对雇主明确规定过失雇佣法,他们就会知道何时可以雇佣有前科的人,同时避免承担责任,从而更有可能雇佣有前科的人。因此,当雇主知道他们可以采取什么措施来避免雇佣过失诉讼时,雇主将更有可能雇佣更多的前罪犯,而不是各州有效地强迫雇主雇用有前科的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Negligent Hiring and Criminal Rehabilitation: Employing Ex-Convicts, Yet Avoiding Liability
In the attached article, I seek to make two contributions. First, I argue that states should make negligent-hiring laws clear for employers, so they know when they may hire an ex-convict and avoid liability. Second, I argue that states should allow employers to refuse to hire ex-convicts based solely on their status as ex-convicts. Some articles and states - e.g., New York and Wisconsin - perpetuate the idea that state law should require employers to hire ex-convicts to help them reintegrate into society. I argue that if states made negligent-hiring law clear for employers, they would know when they could hire an ex-convict yet avoid liability and would thus be more likely to hire ex-convicts. So instead of states effectively forcing employers to hire ex-convicts, employers will be more likely to hire more ex-convicts when employers know what steps they can take to avoid a negligent-hiring suit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信