当代背景下的公共政策:国家和国际趋势*

A. C. N. Capella
{"title":"当代背景下的公共政策:国家和国际趋势*","authors":"A. C. N. Capella","doi":"10.1590/1981-3821201700020011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public policies in contemporary contexts: national and international Tendencies * (Menicucci, Telma Maria Goncalves and Gontijo, Jose Geraldo Leandro. Gestao e Politicas Publicas no Cenario Contemporaneo: Tendencias Nacionais e Internacionais. Rio de Janeiro: FIOCRUZ, 2016)Organizing an edited volume is an intellectual endeavor that, when wellexecuted, results in a rich collection of perspectives, interpretations and contributions about a given subject, offering the reader valuable material for broadening their knowledge. This is the case for 'Gestao e Politicas Publicas no Cenario Contemporaneo' (Management and Public Policies in a Contemporary Context), organized by Telma Menicucci and Jose Geraldo Gontijo. It brings together articles by specialists and researchers from different teaching and research institutions in Brazil and abroad with experience in areas such as political science, public policy, public administration, sociology, and urban planning, among others. Throughout the 17 chapters, organized in five thematic sections, the authors introduce different frameworks, methodologies and perspectives, supplying the reader with a diversified overview of management and contemporary public policy.The first part of the edited volume brings together four chapters that look at the theoretical and empirical dimensions of governance, emphasizing different aspects of state performance and their interaction with society in the contemporary production of public policies. Jon Pierre's chapter highlights what he considers to be one of today's biggest paradoxes: the reduction of state capacity at the exact moment when society is becoming more complex. The argument developed by Pierre is that political leadership consists of an essential element for re-articulating the role of the government and reestablishing state capacity.Next, Volker Schneider investigates another aspect of governance: the distribution of power in public policy networks. Analyzing environmental policy networks in Germany, he examines the 'post-democracy' thesis, according to which advanced democracies should be in decline. His study reveals changes in the power structure of environmental policy networks, but in the opposite direction to that which would be expected by a 'post-democratic' perspective. This points to a more equitable distribution of power in more recent years.The conceptual debate about governance is next used by Eduardo Marques as the base for his study about urban public policies in Brazil. He introduces the debate about governance in Latin America and problematizes some associations that are commonly found in the literature. Investigating the case of Sao Paulo, he identifies distinct patterns of governance that vary depending on the actors participating, the structure of the decision-making process, and the degree of insulation of the state, among other elements. This contributes to the operationalization of the concept of governance in city-oriented public policy.The theoretical discussion about governance is taken up again by Roberto Pires and Alexandre Gomide, who examine the dimension of state capacity by looking at institutional arrangements for the implementation of public policies. Such a theoretical reflection sustains the empirical analysis about the recent experience of the Brazilian government. Pires and Gomide identify similarities between these programs, such as the formation of a complex network of actors during the implementation process, with an emphasis on the participation of state-owned enterprises and public banks and their interactions with the private sector. They also verify distinct aspects related to the participation of federal entities in the arrangements, openness to social participation, and intra-governmental centralization. Such findings help characterize the model of governance present in the federal government's arrangements of implementation, and contributes to studies about governance and state capacity in Brazil. …","PeriodicalId":159271,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Political Science Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public policies in contemporary contexts: national and international Tendencies*\",\"authors\":\"A. C. N. Capella\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1981-3821201700020011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Public policies in contemporary contexts: national and international Tendencies * (Menicucci, Telma Maria Goncalves and Gontijo, Jose Geraldo Leandro. Gestao e Politicas Publicas no Cenario Contemporaneo: Tendencias Nacionais e Internacionais. Rio de Janeiro: FIOCRUZ, 2016)Organizing an edited volume is an intellectual endeavor that, when wellexecuted, results in a rich collection of perspectives, interpretations and contributions about a given subject, offering the reader valuable material for broadening their knowledge. This is the case for 'Gestao e Politicas Publicas no Cenario Contemporaneo' (Management and Public Policies in a Contemporary Context), organized by Telma Menicucci and Jose Geraldo Gontijo. It brings together articles by specialists and researchers from different teaching and research institutions in Brazil and abroad with experience in areas such as political science, public policy, public administration, sociology, and urban planning, among others. Throughout the 17 chapters, organized in five thematic sections, the authors introduce different frameworks, methodologies and perspectives, supplying the reader with a diversified overview of management and contemporary public policy.The first part of the edited volume brings together four chapters that look at the theoretical and empirical dimensions of governance, emphasizing different aspects of state performance and their interaction with society in the contemporary production of public policies. Jon Pierre's chapter highlights what he considers to be one of today's biggest paradoxes: the reduction of state capacity at the exact moment when society is becoming more complex. The argument developed by Pierre is that political leadership consists of an essential element for re-articulating the role of the government and reestablishing state capacity.Next, Volker Schneider investigates another aspect of governance: the distribution of power in public policy networks. Analyzing environmental policy networks in Germany, he examines the 'post-democracy' thesis, according to which advanced democracies should be in decline. His study reveals changes in the power structure of environmental policy networks, but in the opposite direction to that which would be expected by a 'post-democratic' perspective. This points to a more equitable distribution of power in more recent years.The conceptual debate about governance is next used by Eduardo Marques as the base for his study about urban public policies in Brazil. He introduces the debate about governance in Latin America and problematizes some associations that are commonly found in the literature. Investigating the case of Sao Paulo, he identifies distinct patterns of governance that vary depending on the actors participating, the structure of the decision-making process, and the degree of insulation of the state, among other elements. This contributes to the operationalization of the concept of governance in city-oriented public policy.The theoretical discussion about governance is taken up again by Roberto Pires and Alexandre Gomide, who examine the dimension of state capacity by looking at institutional arrangements for the implementation of public policies. Such a theoretical reflection sustains the empirical analysis about the recent experience of the Brazilian government. Pires and Gomide identify similarities between these programs, such as the formation of a complex network of actors during the implementation process, with an emphasis on the participation of state-owned enterprises and public banks and their interactions with the private sector. They also verify distinct aspects related to the participation of federal entities in the arrangements, openness to social participation, and intra-governmental centralization. Such findings help characterize the model of governance present in the federal government's arrangements of implementation, and contributes to studies about governance and state capacity in Brazil. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":159271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Political Science Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Political Science Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201700020011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Political Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201700020011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

当代语境下的公共政策:国家和国际趋势*(梅尼库奇,泰尔玛·玛丽亚·贡萨尔维斯和贡蒂霍,何塞·杰拉尔多·莱安德罗)。当代公共政治:国家和国际趋势。里约热内卢:FIOCRUZ, 2016)组织编辑卷是一项智力努力,如果执行得当,会产生关于特定主题的丰富观点,解释和贡献,为读者提供拓宽知识的宝贵材料。这就是由Telma Menicucci和Jose Geraldo Gontijo组织的“当代背景下的管理和公共政策”(Gestao e Politicas Publicas no Cenario Contemporaneo)的情况。它汇集了来自巴西和国外不同教学和研究机构的专家和研究人员的文章,他们在政治学、公共政策、公共管理、社会学和城市规划等领域拥有丰富的经验。全书共17章,分为五个主题部分,作者介绍了不同的框架、方法和观点,为读者提供了管理和当代公共政策的多元化概述。编辑卷的第一部分汇集了四个章节,着眼于治理的理论和实证维度,强调国家绩效的不同方面及其在当代公共政策生产中与社会的互动。乔恩•皮埃尔的这一章强调了他认为是当今最大的悖论之一:在社会变得越来越复杂的时候,国家能力却在下降。皮埃尔提出的论点是,政治领导是重新阐明政府角色和重建国家能力的基本要素。接下来,Volker Schneider研究了治理的另一个方面:公共政策网络中的权力分配。通过分析德国的环境政策网络,他检验了“后民主”理论,根据该理论,先进的民主国家应该衰落。他的研究揭示了环境政策网络权力结构的变化,但与“后民主”观点所期望的方向相反。这表明近年来权力分配更加公平。接下来,爱德华多·马奎斯将关于治理的概念辩论作为他研究巴西城市公共政策的基础。他介绍了关于拉丁美洲治理的辩论,并对文献中常见的一些关联提出了问题。通过调查圣保罗的案例,他确定了不同的治理模式,这些模式取决于参与者、决策过程的结构、国家的隔离程度以及其他因素。这有助于在面向城市的公共政策中实施治理概念。关于治理的理论讨论由罗伯托·皮雷和亚历山大·戈米德再次提出,他们通过观察公共政策实施的制度安排来研究国家能力的维度。这样的理论反思支撑了对巴西政府近期经验的实证分析。Pires和Gomide指出了这些方案之间的相似之处,例如在实施过程中形成了一个复杂的行动者网络,强调国有企业和公共银行的参与及其与私营部门的互动。它们还验证了与联邦实体参与安排、对社会参与的开放性和政府内部集中化有关的不同方面。这些发现有助于描述联邦政府实施安排中的治理模式,并有助于研究巴西的治理和国家能力。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public policies in contemporary contexts: national and international Tendencies*
Public policies in contemporary contexts: national and international Tendencies * (Menicucci, Telma Maria Goncalves and Gontijo, Jose Geraldo Leandro. Gestao e Politicas Publicas no Cenario Contemporaneo: Tendencias Nacionais e Internacionais. Rio de Janeiro: FIOCRUZ, 2016)Organizing an edited volume is an intellectual endeavor that, when wellexecuted, results in a rich collection of perspectives, interpretations and contributions about a given subject, offering the reader valuable material for broadening their knowledge. This is the case for 'Gestao e Politicas Publicas no Cenario Contemporaneo' (Management and Public Policies in a Contemporary Context), organized by Telma Menicucci and Jose Geraldo Gontijo. It brings together articles by specialists and researchers from different teaching and research institutions in Brazil and abroad with experience in areas such as political science, public policy, public administration, sociology, and urban planning, among others. Throughout the 17 chapters, organized in five thematic sections, the authors introduce different frameworks, methodologies and perspectives, supplying the reader with a diversified overview of management and contemporary public policy.The first part of the edited volume brings together four chapters that look at the theoretical and empirical dimensions of governance, emphasizing different aspects of state performance and their interaction with society in the contemporary production of public policies. Jon Pierre's chapter highlights what he considers to be one of today's biggest paradoxes: the reduction of state capacity at the exact moment when society is becoming more complex. The argument developed by Pierre is that political leadership consists of an essential element for re-articulating the role of the government and reestablishing state capacity.Next, Volker Schneider investigates another aspect of governance: the distribution of power in public policy networks. Analyzing environmental policy networks in Germany, he examines the 'post-democracy' thesis, according to which advanced democracies should be in decline. His study reveals changes in the power structure of environmental policy networks, but in the opposite direction to that which would be expected by a 'post-democratic' perspective. This points to a more equitable distribution of power in more recent years.The conceptual debate about governance is next used by Eduardo Marques as the base for his study about urban public policies in Brazil. He introduces the debate about governance in Latin America and problematizes some associations that are commonly found in the literature. Investigating the case of Sao Paulo, he identifies distinct patterns of governance that vary depending on the actors participating, the structure of the decision-making process, and the degree of insulation of the state, among other elements. This contributes to the operationalization of the concept of governance in city-oriented public policy.The theoretical discussion about governance is taken up again by Roberto Pires and Alexandre Gomide, who examine the dimension of state capacity by looking at institutional arrangements for the implementation of public policies. Such a theoretical reflection sustains the empirical analysis about the recent experience of the Brazilian government. Pires and Gomide identify similarities between these programs, such as the formation of a complex network of actors during the implementation process, with an emphasis on the participation of state-owned enterprises and public banks and their interactions with the private sector. They also verify distinct aspects related to the participation of federal entities in the arrangements, openness to social participation, and intra-governmental centralization. Such findings help characterize the model of governance present in the federal government's arrangements of implementation, and contributes to studies about governance and state capacity in Brazil. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信