不公平的代价

M. Köppen, Kaori Yoshida
{"title":"不公平的代价","authors":"M. Köppen, Kaori Yoshida","doi":"10.1109/INCoS.2016.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Here, measures for unfairness in resource allocation problems are studied. The extremity of such measures should match with an intuitive concept of an unfair allocation. To achieve a computational model for unfairness, various fairness models are extended to cover a related meaning of unfairness as well. In addition to the lexicographic maxmax relation, a model based on exponential utilities is introduced. Furthermore, a new mean, the symmetric Lehmer mean is identified as being able to favour allocations restricted to a subset of users only. Case examples of network flow control problems show feasibility of the proposed unfairness measures, as well as specific differences. Especially the symmetric Lehmer mean appears capable to handle unfairness in a much more nuanced way, while lexicographic maxmax appears as the computationally most convenient and also most intuitive measure. In all cases it can be shown that unfair allocations are not always efficient and that there is a price of unfairness as well.","PeriodicalId":102056,"journal":{"name":"2016 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (INCoS)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Price of Unfairness\",\"authors\":\"M. Köppen, Kaori Yoshida\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INCoS.2016.71\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Here, measures for unfairness in resource allocation problems are studied. The extremity of such measures should match with an intuitive concept of an unfair allocation. To achieve a computational model for unfairness, various fairness models are extended to cover a related meaning of unfairness as well. In addition to the lexicographic maxmax relation, a model based on exponential utilities is introduced. Furthermore, a new mean, the symmetric Lehmer mean is identified as being able to favour allocations restricted to a subset of users only. Case examples of network flow control problems show feasibility of the proposed unfairness measures, as well as specific differences. Especially the symmetric Lehmer mean appears capable to handle unfairness in a much more nuanced way, while lexicographic maxmax appears as the computationally most convenient and also most intuitive measure. In all cases it can be shown that unfair allocations are not always efficient and that there is a price of unfairness as well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":102056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (INCoS)\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (INCoS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INCoS.2016.71\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (INCoS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INCoS.2016.71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文研究了资源分配问题中不公平的度量方法。这种措施的极端程度应符合不公平分配的直观概念。为了获得不公平的计算模型,我们对各种公平模型进行了扩展,以涵盖不公平的相关含义。除了字典学的最大关系外,还引入了一个基于指数效用的模型。此外,一个新的平均,对称Lehmer平均被确定为能够支持分配仅限于用户的子集。网络流量控制问题的实例表明了所提出的不公平措施的可行性,以及具体的区别。特别是对称Lehmer平均值似乎能够以一种更微妙的方式处理不公平,而字典最大似乎是计算上最方便,也是最直观的度量。在所有情况下都可以证明,不公平的分配并不总是有效的,而且也有不公平的代价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Price of Unfairness
Here, measures for unfairness in resource allocation problems are studied. The extremity of such measures should match with an intuitive concept of an unfair allocation. To achieve a computational model for unfairness, various fairness models are extended to cover a related meaning of unfairness as well. In addition to the lexicographic maxmax relation, a model based on exponential utilities is introduced. Furthermore, a new mean, the symmetric Lehmer mean is identified as being able to favour allocations restricted to a subset of users only. Case examples of network flow control problems show feasibility of the proposed unfairness measures, as well as specific differences. Especially the symmetric Lehmer mean appears capable to handle unfairness in a much more nuanced way, while lexicographic maxmax appears as the computationally most convenient and also most intuitive measure. In all cases it can be shown that unfair allocations are not always efficient and that there is a price of unfairness as well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信