{"title":"对易出错链路的链路级协议的分析","authors":"L. J. Miller","doi":"10.1145/800081.802666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes the maximum throughput across a full duplex link, under three link level protocols. The three protocols all assume cumulative acknowledgements, but the sender's retransmission policy and the destination's policy on retaining correctly received packets which arrive before an expected retransmission do differ. The results quantify the throughput advantages in retaining all correctly received packets, for the two different retransmission policies. A retention policy on the part of the destination is most advantageous when the link is quite error-prone.","PeriodicalId":217472,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the seventh symposium on Data communications","volume":"460 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An analysis of link level protocols for error prone links\",\"authors\":\"L. J. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/800081.802666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyzes the maximum throughput across a full duplex link, under three link level protocols. The three protocols all assume cumulative acknowledgements, but the sender's retransmission policy and the destination's policy on retaining correctly received packets which arrive before an expected retransmission do differ. The results quantify the throughput advantages in retaining all correctly received packets, for the two different retransmission policies. A retention policy on the part of the destination is most advantageous when the link is quite error-prone.\",\"PeriodicalId\":217472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the seventh symposium on Data communications\",\"volume\":\"460 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the seventh symposium on Data communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/800081.802666\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the seventh symposium on Data communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/800081.802666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
An analysis of link level protocols for error prone links
This paper analyzes the maximum throughput across a full duplex link, under three link level protocols. The three protocols all assume cumulative acknowledgements, but the sender's retransmission policy and the destination's policy on retaining correctly received packets which arrive before an expected retransmission do differ. The results quantify the throughput advantages in retaining all correctly received packets, for the two different retransmission policies. A retention policy on the part of the destination is most advantageous when the link is quite error-prone.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
