网络编码与擦除编码:自组织网络中的可靠多播

Atsushi Fujimura
{"title":"网络编码与擦除编码:自组织网络中的可靠多播","authors":"Atsushi Fujimura","doi":"10.1109/MILCOM.2008.4753100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Providing reliable and efficient networking services in wireless ad hoc networks is extremely challenging due to high mobility and unstable wireless nature: a significant number of packets can be corrupt or lost. To increase the reliability in packet erasure networks, various coding schemes have been proposed. Network coding (NC) and erasure coding (EC) are such well-known coding techniques recently considered to be used for multicast communications. Both schemes are able to encode original packets into a potentially infinite data stream of encoded packets. Receivers can reconstruct the original packets once they have collected a certain number of encoded packets. The main difference of these schemes is that NC allows intermediate nodes to encode packets they have received so far whereas EC is an end-to-end coding which allows only sources to encode. Both schemes are considered to be able to provide excellent ammunition against erasure networks. However, dasiathe jury is still outpsila regarding which scheme is suitable in ad hoc networks. In this paper, based on simulations and analysis study, we present information on the performance of both schemes which may be useful for selecting the better coding scheme.","PeriodicalId":434891,"journal":{"name":"MILCOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Military Communications Conference","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"55","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Network coding vs. erasure coding: Reliable multicast in ad hoc networks\",\"authors\":\"Atsushi Fujimura\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MILCOM.2008.4753100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Providing reliable and efficient networking services in wireless ad hoc networks is extremely challenging due to high mobility and unstable wireless nature: a significant number of packets can be corrupt or lost. To increase the reliability in packet erasure networks, various coding schemes have been proposed. Network coding (NC) and erasure coding (EC) are such well-known coding techniques recently considered to be used for multicast communications. Both schemes are able to encode original packets into a potentially infinite data stream of encoded packets. Receivers can reconstruct the original packets once they have collected a certain number of encoded packets. The main difference of these schemes is that NC allows intermediate nodes to encode packets they have received so far whereas EC is an end-to-end coding which allows only sources to encode. Both schemes are considered to be able to provide excellent ammunition against erasure networks. However, dasiathe jury is still outpsila regarding which scheme is suitable in ad hoc networks. In this paper, based on simulations and analysis study, we present information on the performance of both schemes which may be useful for selecting the better coding scheme.\",\"PeriodicalId\":434891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MILCOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Military Communications Conference\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"55\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MILCOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Military Communications Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.2008.4753100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MILCOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Military Communications Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.2008.4753100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 55

摘要

由于高移动性和不稳定的无线特性,在无线自组织网络中提供可靠和高效的网络服务极具挑战性:大量数据包可能损坏或丢失。为了提高包擦除网络的可靠性,人们提出了多种编码方案。网络编码(NC)和擦除编码(EC)是目前公认的用于组播通信的编码技术。这两种方案都能够将原始数据包编码为编码数据包的潜在无限数据流。一旦接收方收集到一定数量的编码数据包,就可以重构原始数据包。这些方案的主要区别在于NC允许中间节点对它们迄今为止收到的数据包进行编码,而EC是端到端编码,只允许源进行编码。这两种方案都被认为能够提供对付擦除网络的极佳弹药。然而,对于哪种方案适用于自组织网络,目前尚无定论。本文在仿真和分析研究的基础上,对两种方案的性能进行了比较,为选择更好的编码方案提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Network coding vs. erasure coding: Reliable multicast in ad hoc networks
Providing reliable and efficient networking services in wireless ad hoc networks is extremely challenging due to high mobility and unstable wireless nature: a significant number of packets can be corrupt or lost. To increase the reliability in packet erasure networks, various coding schemes have been proposed. Network coding (NC) and erasure coding (EC) are such well-known coding techniques recently considered to be used for multicast communications. Both schemes are able to encode original packets into a potentially infinite data stream of encoded packets. Receivers can reconstruct the original packets once they have collected a certain number of encoded packets. The main difference of these schemes is that NC allows intermediate nodes to encode packets they have received so far whereas EC is an end-to-end coding which allows only sources to encode. Both schemes are considered to be able to provide excellent ammunition against erasure networks. However, dasiathe jury is still outpsila regarding which scheme is suitable in ad hoc networks. In this paper, based on simulations and analysis study, we present information on the performance of both schemes which may be useful for selecting the better coding scheme.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信