{"title":"化身博士和海德先生:大卫·埃德加改编的两个版本","authors":"David Cottis","doi":"10.1386/jafp_00086_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1991, the Royal Shakespeare Company staged David Edgar’s The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, an adaptation of Robert Louis Stevenson’s 1885 novella, directed by Peter Wood, to a generally negative critical and commercial response. Five years later, the Birmingham Repertory Theatre produced Edgar’s revised version of the play, using the shorter title Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, to much more positive reviews, often from the same people. The striking thing about this radically different response is that, apart from a single element, the two scripts are very similar. They can therefore serve almost as a real-life scientific experiment, demonstrating the difference that a single change will make. This article will consider the various choices that an adaptor may make with this story and look at what the different responses to the two versions can tell us about the nature of this story, and possibly about horror and fantasy in general.","PeriodicalId":126238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adaptation in Film & Performance","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dr Jekyll and/or Mr Hyde: The two versions of David Edgar’s stage adaptation\",\"authors\":\"David Cottis\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/jafp_00086_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1991, the Royal Shakespeare Company staged David Edgar’s The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, an adaptation of Robert Louis Stevenson’s 1885 novella, directed by Peter Wood, to a generally negative critical and commercial response. Five years later, the Birmingham Repertory Theatre produced Edgar’s revised version of the play, using the shorter title Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, to much more positive reviews, often from the same people. The striking thing about this radically different response is that, apart from a single element, the two scripts are very similar. They can therefore serve almost as a real-life scientific experiment, demonstrating the difference that a single change will make. This article will consider the various choices that an adaptor may make with this story and look at what the different responses to the two versions can tell us about the nature of this story, and possibly about horror and fantasy in general.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Adaptation in Film & Performance\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Adaptation in Film & Performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/jafp_00086_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adaptation in Film & Performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/jafp_00086_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
1991年,皇家莎士比亚剧团上演了大卫·埃德加的《化身博士怪案》,改编自罗伯特·路易斯·史蒂文森1885年的中篇小说,由彼得·伍德执导,评论界和商界反响普遍不佳。五年后,伯明翰话剧团(Birmingham Repertory Theatre)制作了埃德加的修订版,使用了更短的剧名《化身博士》(Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde),得到了更积极的评价,而且往往来自同一个人。这两种截然不同的反应的惊人之处在于,除了一个元素之外,这两种剧本非常相似。因此,它们几乎可以作为现实生活中的科学实验,证明一个单一的改变会产生的差异。本文将考虑改编者对这个故事可能做出的各种选择,并看看对两个版本的不同反应可以告诉我们这个故事的本质,以及可能的恐怖和幻想。
Dr Jekyll and/or Mr Hyde: The two versions of David Edgar’s stage adaptation
In 1991, the Royal Shakespeare Company staged David Edgar’s The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, an adaptation of Robert Louis Stevenson’s 1885 novella, directed by Peter Wood, to a generally negative critical and commercial response. Five years later, the Birmingham Repertory Theatre produced Edgar’s revised version of the play, using the shorter title Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, to much more positive reviews, often from the same people. The striking thing about this radically different response is that, apart from a single element, the two scripts are very similar. They can therefore serve almost as a real-life scientific experiment, demonstrating the difference that a single change will make. This article will consider the various choices that an adaptor may make with this story and look at what the different responses to the two versions can tell us about the nature of this story, and possibly about horror and fantasy in general.