非线性系统辨识:预测误差法与神经网络

Jinming Sun, Yanqiu Huang, Wanli Yu, A. Ortiz
{"title":"非线性系统辨识:预测误差法与神经网络","authors":"Jinming Sun, Yanqiu Huang, Wanli Yu, A. Ortiz","doi":"10.1109/MOCAST52088.2021.9493336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"System identification has been used in various domains for analyzing system properties and carrying out filtering, prediction and automatic control. Prediction error method (PEM) is one of the classic methods to estimate system parameters and exploit dynamical structure of the studied system; while neural network (NN) is favorable for black-box systems with unknown structures. As the popularity of Internet of Things (IoT) and Cyber-physical systems (CPS) increases, the identification tasks are moving more towards resource-constrained devices. Accordingly, some studies incorporate system prior knowledge into NN to improve its efficiency. However, it is unclear whether the adapted NN outperforms the classic PEM.This paper provides a fair comparison between two techniques in terms of estimation accuracy and speed on several common nonlinear systems. The results indicate that NN is wider applicable and accurate, but more expensive from computational perspective; whereas PEM is more lightweight, but has limitations when the system input has frequent abrupt changes.","PeriodicalId":146990,"journal":{"name":"2021 10th International Conference on Modern Circuits and Systems Technologies (MOCAST)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonlinear System Identification: Prediction Error Method vs Neural Network\",\"authors\":\"Jinming Sun, Yanqiu Huang, Wanli Yu, A. Ortiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MOCAST52088.2021.9493336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"System identification has been used in various domains for analyzing system properties and carrying out filtering, prediction and automatic control. Prediction error method (PEM) is one of the classic methods to estimate system parameters and exploit dynamical structure of the studied system; while neural network (NN) is favorable for black-box systems with unknown structures. As the popularity of Internet of Things (IoT) and Cyber-physical systems (CPS) increases, the identification tasks are moving more towards resource-constrained devices. Accordingly, some studies incorporate system prior knowledge into NN to improve its efficiency. However, it is unclear whether the adapted NN outperforms the classic PEM.This paper provides a fair comparison between two techniques in terms of estimation accuracy and speed on several common nonlinear systems. The results indicate that NN is wider applicable and accurate, but more expensive from computational perspective; whereas PEM is more lightweight, but has limitations when the system input has frequent abrupt changes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":146990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 10th International Conference on Modern Circuits and Systems Technologies (MOCAST)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 10th International Conference on Modern Circuits and Systems Technologies (MOCAST)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MOCAST52088.2021.9493336\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 10th International Conference on Modern Circuits and Systems Technologies (MOCAST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MOCAST52088.2021.9493336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

系统辨识已广泛应用于各个领域,用于分析系统特性,进行过滤、预测和自动控制。预测误差法(PEM)是估计系统参数和开发系统动态结构的经典方法之一;而神经网络(NN)则对结构未知的黑箱系统较为有利。随着物联网(IoT)和网络物理系统(CPS)的普及,识别任务越来越多地转向资源受限的设备。因此,一些研究将系统先验知识引入到神经网络中以提高其效率。然而,目前尚不清楚是否适应的神经网络优于经典的PEM。本文在几种常见非线性系统的估计精度和速度方面对两种方法进行了比较。结果表明,神经网络具有更广泛的适用性和准确性,但从计算量的角度来看,代价较高;而PEM更轻量,但在系统输入频繁突变时存在局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nonlinear System Identification: Prediction Error Method vs Neural Network
System identification has been used in various domains for analyzing system properties and carrying out filtering, prediction and automatic control. Prediction error method (PEM) is one of the classic methods to estimate system parameters and exploit dynamical structure of the studied system; while neural network (NN) is favorable for black-box systems with unknown structures. As the popularity of Internet of Things (IoT) and Cyber-physical systems (CPS) increases, the identification tasks are moving more towards resource-constrained devices. Accordingly, some studies incorporate system prior knowledge into NN to improve its efficiency. However, it is unclear whether the adapted NN outperforms the classic PEM.This paper provides a fair comparison between two techniques in terms of estimation accuracy and speed on several common nonlinear systems. The results indicate that NN is wider applicable and accurate, but more expensive from computational perspective; whereas PEM is more lightweight, but has limitations when the system input has frequent abrupt changes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信