小组在竞赛中的排他性

Jonas Send
{"title":"小组在竞赛中的排他性","authors":"Jonas Send","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3752731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I analyse a group contest in which groups decide over two dimensions of membership-exclusivity: whether a member is allowed to join the group at all, and whether this member is allowed to join another group as well. If the prize is mostly private, group leaders do not offer membership in equilibrium. If the prize is mostly public or the elasticity of marginal effort cost high, they offer exclusive membership. Membership commitment, membership fees, and the introduction of a third group all lead to the emergence of equilibria with endogenous non-exclusive membership. A contest designer interested in maximising effort would like to prohibit non-exclusive membership and allow exclusive membership only if groups are more effective than singletons.","PeriodicalId":300059,"journal":{"name":"Max Planck Institute for Tax Law & Public Finance Research Paper Series","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exclusivity of Groups in Contests\",\"authors\":\"Jonas Send\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3752731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I analyse a group contest in which groups decide over two dimensions of membership-exclusivity: whether a member is allowed to join the group at all, and whether this member is allowed to join another group as well. If the prize is mostly private, group leaders do not offer membership in equilibrium. If the prize is mostly public or the elasticity of marginal effort cost high, they offer exclusive membership. Membership commitment, membership fees, and the introduction of a third group all lead to the emergence of equilibria with endogenous non-exclusive membership. A contest designer interested in maximising effort would like to prohibit non-exclusive membership and allow exclusive membership only if groups are more effective than singletons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Max Planck Institute for Tax Law & Public Finance Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Max Planck Institute for Tax Law & Public Finance Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3752731\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Max Planck Institute for Tax Law & Public Finance Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3752731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我分析了一个群体竞赛,在这个竞赛中,群体决定成员排他性的两个维度:是否允许一个成员加入这个群体,以及是否允许这个成员加入另一个群体。如果奖励主要是私人的,那么群体领导者就不会均衡地提供成员资格。如果奖励主要是公开的,或者边际努力的弹性成本很高,他们会提供专属会员资格。成员承诺、会员费和第三团体的引入都会导致具有内生非排他性成员的均衡的出现。对努力最大化感兴趣的竞赛设计者可能会禁止非排他性成员,只有在团队比单个成员更有效的情况下才允许排他性成员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exclusivity of Groups in Contests
I analyse a group contest in which groups decide over two dimensions of membership-exclusivity: whether a member is allowed to join the group at all, and whether this member is allowed to join another group as well. If the prize is mostly private, group leaders do not offer membership in equilibrium. If the prize is mostly public or the elasticity of marginal effort cost high, they offer exclusive membership. Membership commitment, membership fees, and the introduction of a third group all lead to the emergence of equilibria with endogenous non-exclusive membership. A contest designer interested in maximising effort would like to prohibit non-exclusive membership and allow exclusive membership only if groups are more effective than singletons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信