基于CPT数据和土壤性质的人工神经网络预测SPT值

Hendra Fernando, S. Nugroho, R. Suryanita, M. Kikumoto
{"title":"基于CPT数据和土壤性质的人工神经网络预测SPT值","authors":"Hendra Fernando, S. Nugroho, R. Suryanita, M. Kikumoto","doi":"10.29099/ijair.v5i2.208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial neural networks (ANN) are now widely used and are becoming popular among researchers, especially in the geotechnical field. In general, data normalization is carried out to make ANN whose range is in accordance with the activation function used. Other studies have tried to create an ANN without normalizing the data and ANN is considered capable of making predictions. In this study, a comparison of ANN with and without data normalization was carried out in predicting SPT values based on CPT data and soil physical properties on cohesive soils. The input data used in this study are the value of tip resistance, sleeve resistance, effective soil overburden pressure, liquid limit, plastic limit and percentage of sand, silt and clay. The results showed that the ANN was able to make predictions effectively both on networks with and without data normalization. In this study, it was found that the ANN without data normalization showed a smaller error value than the ANN with data normalization. In the network model without data normalization, RMSE values were 3.024, MAE 1.822, R2 0.952 on the training data and RMSE 2.163, MAE 1.233 and R2 0.976 on the test data. Whereas in the ANN with data normalization, the RMSE values were 3.441, MAE 2.318, R2 0.936 in the training data and RMSE 2.785, MAE 2.085 and R2 0.963 in the test data. ANN with normalization provides a simpler architecture, which only requires 1 hidden layer compared to ANN without normalization which requires 2 hidden layer architecture.","PeriodicalId":334856,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of SPT value based on CPT data and soil properties using ANN with and without normalization\",\"authors\":\"Hendra Fernando, S. Nugroho, R. Suryanita, M. Kikumoto\",\"doi\":\"10.29099/ijair.v5i2.208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Artificial neural networks (ANN) are now widely used and are becoming popular among researchers, especially in the geotechnical field. In general, data normalization is carried out to make ANN whose range is in accordance with the activation function used. Other studies have tried to create an ANN without normalizing the data and ANN is considered capable of making predictions. In this study, a comparison of ANN with and without data normalization was carried out in predicting SPT values based on CPT data and soil physical properties on cohesive soils. The input data used in this study are the value of tip resistance, sleeve resistance, effective soil overburden pressure, liquid limit, plastic limit and percentage of sand, silt and clay. The results showed that the ANN was able to make predictions effectively both on networks with and without data normalization. In this study, it was found that the ANN without data normalization showed a smaller error value than the ANN with data normalization. In the network model without data normalization, RMSE values were 3.024, MAE 1.822, R2 0.952 on the training data and RMSE 2.163, MAE 1.233 and R2 0.976 on the test data. Whereas in the ANN with data normalization, the RMSE values were 3.441, MAE 2.318, R2 0.936 in the training data and RMSE 2.785, MAE 2.085 and R2 0.963 in the test data. ANN with normalization provides a simpler architecture, which only requires 1 hidden layer compared to ANN without normalization which requires 2 hidden layer architecture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":334856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29099/ijair.v5i2.208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29099/ijair.v5i2.208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

人工神经网络(Artificial neural networks, ANN)的应用越来越广泛,尤其是在岩土工程领域。一般情况下,对数据进行归一化处理,使神经网络的取值范围与所用的激活函数一致。其他研究试图在不规范化数据的情况下创建人工神经网络,人工神经网络被认为有能力做出预测。在本研究中,比较了基于CPT数据和土壤物理性质的人工神经网络预测黏性土壤的SPT值。本研究使用的输入数据为端部阻力值、套筒阻力值、有效土覆盖层压力值、液限值、塑性限值以及砂、粉、粘土的百分比。结果表明,人工神经网络在有数据归一化和没有数据归一化的网络上都能有效地进行预测。本研究发现,未经数据归一化处理的人工神经网络比经过数据归一化处理的人工神经网络误差值更小。在未进行数据归一化处理的网络模型中,训练数据的RMSE为3.024,MAE为1.822,R2 0.952;测试数据的RMSE为2.163,MAE为1.233,R2 0.976。而在数据归一化的人工神经网络中,训练数据的RMSE为3.441,MAE 2.318, R2 0.936,测试数据的RMSE为2.785,MAE 2.085, R2 0.963。与需要2个隐藏层的非规范化神经网络相比,规范化神经网络提供了一个更简单的体系结构,它只需要1个隐藏层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction of SPT value based on CPT data and soil properties using ANN with and without normalization
Artificial neural networks (ANN) are now widely used and are becoming popular among researchers, especially in the geotechnical field. In general, data normalization is carried out to make ANN whose range is in accordance with the activation function used. Other studies have tried to create an ANN without normalizing the data and ANN is considered capable of making predictions. In this study, a comparison of ANN with and without data normalization was carried out in predicting SPT values based on CPT data and soil physical properties on cohesive soils. The input data used in this study are the value of tip resistance, sleeve resistance, effective soil overburden pressure, liquid limit, plastic limit and percentage of sand, silt and clay. The results showed that the ANN was able to make predictions effectively both on networks with and without data normalization. In this study, it was found that the ANN without data normalization showed a smaller error value than the ANN with data normalization. In the network model without data normalization, RMSE values were 3.024, MAE 1.822, R2 0.952 on the training data and RMSE 2.163, MAE 1.233 and R2 0.976 on the test data. Whereas in the ANN with data normalization, the RMSE values were 3.441, MAE 2.318, R2 0.936 in the training data and RMSE 2.785, MAE 2.085 and R2 0.963 in the test data. ANN with normalization provides a simpler architecture, which only requires 1 hidden layer compared to ANN without normalization which requires 2 hidden layer architecture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信