论弗洛伊德自然科学概念的起源

V. Carvalho, Luiz Roberto Monzani
{"title":"论弗洛伊德自然科学概念的起源","authors":"V. Carvalho, Luiz Roberto Monzani","doi":"10.1590/S1678-31662015000400004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines some of the theoretical outlooks Freud used to acquire the epistemological values that underlie the foundation of his notion of natural science. On the one hand Freud was familiar with the ideas of specific authors (Brucke, Helmholtz, among others), who had made major contributions that support of psychology's status as a science by appealing to physics and physiology. On the other hand, his contact with certain philosophers (Brentano and Stuart Mill) allowed him to use their defenses of psychology's scientific status without abandoning naturalism and without recourse to physiology. Our historical evaluation of these struggles supports that Freud was affected by various points of view concerning psychology's standing within the natural sciences. Owing to the diverse influences on Freud, we need to figure out how we can put his epistemology and his concept of naturalism into perspective.","PeriodicalId":168872,"journal":{"name":"Scientiae Studia","volume":"12 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sobre as origens da concepção freudiana de ciências da natureza\",\"authors\":\"V. Carvalho, Luiz Roberto Monzani\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S1678-31662015000400004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines some of the theoretical outlooks Freud used to acquire the epistemological values that underlie the foundation of his notion of natural science. On the one hand Freud was familiar with the ideas of specific authors (Brucke, Helmholtz, among others), who had made major contributions that support of psychology's status as a science by appealing to physics and physiology. On the other hand, his contact with certain philosophers (Brentano and Stuart Mill) allowed him to use their defenses of psychology's scientific status without abandoning naturalism and without recourse to physiology. Our historical evaluation of these struggles supports that Freud was affected by various points of view concerning psychology's standing within the natural sciences. Owing to the diverse influences on Freud, we need to figure out how we can put his epistemology and his concept of naturalism into perspective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":168872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientiae Studia\",\"volume\":\"12 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientiae Studia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662015000400004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientiae Studia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662015000400004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了弗洛伊德用来获得认识论价值的一些理论观点,这些认识论价值构成了他的自然科学概念的基础。一方面,弗洛伊德熟悉某些作者(布鲁克、亥姆霍兹等人)的思想,这些作者通过求助于物理学和生理学,为支持心理学作为一门科学的地位做出了重大贡献。另一方面,他与某些哲学家(布伦塔诺和斯图亚特·密尔)的接触使他能够在不放弃自然主义和不诉诸生理学的情况下,利用他们对心理学科学地位的辩护。我们对这些斗争的历史评价支持弗洛伊德受到关于心理学在自然科学中的地位的各种观点的影响。由于弗洛伊德受到了各种各样的影响,我们需要弄清楚如何正确看待他的认识论和他的自然主义概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sobre as origens da concepção freudiana de ciências da natureza
This article examines some of the theoretical outlooks Freud used to acquire the epistemological values that underlie the foundation of his notion of natural science. On the one hand Freud was familiar with the ideas of specific authors (Brucke, Helmholtz, among others), who had made major contributions that support of psychology's status as a science by appealing to physics and physiology. On the other hand, his contact with certain philosophers (Brentano and Stuart Mill) allowed him to use their defenses of psychology's scientific status without abandoning naturalism and without recourse to physiology. Our historical evaluation of these struggles supports that Freud was affected by various points of view concerning psychology's standing within the natural sciences. Owing to the diverse influences on Freud, we need to figure out how we can put his epistemology and his concept of naturalism into perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信