带领策略雅加达伊斯兰指数的Black-Scholes与GARCH期权模型比较

R. Hendrawan, Z. Arifin
{"title":"带领策略雅加达伊斯兰指数的Black-Scholes与GARCH期权模型比较","authors":"R. Hendrawan, Z. Arifin","doi":"10.35609/jfbr.2023.7.4(2)","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective –The revival of the Islamic economy in Indonesia was marked by the establishment of the Jakarta Islamic Index (JII) on July 3, 2000. From 2000 to 2020, two economic crises hit Indonesia in 2008 and 2020. These crises also had an impact on the high price fluctuations of JII. Assets can be protected from significant losses by hedging. One of the hedging strategies was option contracts with a collar strategy.\nMethodology – The data analysed in this research were the JII closing price data from 2000 to 2020 using the Black Scholes model and the GARCH model with the Collar strategy.\nFindings – Option with the Collar strategy provided more benefits in crises than without Option. In crisis conditions, the Option with the GARCH method and the collar strategy provided a higher average profit of 3.07% on the one-month Option and 7.01% on the three-month Option than without using the Option with the collar strategy. In non-crisis conditions, the Option using the GARCH method, and the collar strategy provided a 0.16% higher average profit at one-month maturity than without the Option. Meanwhile, the average profit decreased by 1.45% at the three-month maturity. The collar strategy resulted in less volatility. Without a collar strategy, JII volatility was 103%. The collar strategy produced maximum volatility of 12.71%, 15.18%, and 17.14%. The findings also revealed that the GARCH model was better than the Black Scholes based on the AMSE value obtained in crisis conditions with a maturity of one month and three months and in non-crisis conditions with a maturity of one month. Meanwhile, the Black Scholes model showed better results in non-crisis conditions with a maturity of three months.\nNovelty – Based on the research result, the Option with a collar strategy is effective for hedging in crisis conditions. This research assesses the collar strategy with several different maturity values to get the most effective value.\nType of Paper: Empirical\nJEL Classification: G11, G13.\nKeywords: Black Scholes; Collar Strategy; GARCH; Jakarta Islamic Index; Option Contracts.\nReference to this paper should be made as follows: Hendrawan, R; Arifin, Z. (2023). Comparison of Black-Scholes and GARCH Option Models on The Jakarta Islamic Index with Collar Strategy, J. Fin. Bank. Review, 7(4), 16 – 27. https://doi.org/10.35609/jfbr.2023.7.4(2)","PeriodicalId":246150,"journal":{"name":"GATR Journal of Finance and Banking Review Vol. 7 (4) January - March 2023","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Black-Scholes and GARCH Option Models on The Jakarta Islamic Index with Collar Strategy\",\"authors\":\"R. Hendrawan, Z. Arifin\",\"doi\":\"10.35609/jfbr.2023.7.4(2)\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective –The revival of the Islamic economy in Indonesia was marked by the establishment of the Jakarta Islamic Index (JII) on July 3, 2000. From 2000 to 2020, two economic crises hit Indonesia in 2008 and 2020. These crises also had an impact on the high price fluctuations of JII. Assets can be protected from significant losses by hedging. One of the hedging strategies was option contracts with a collar strategy.\\nMethodology – The data analysed in this research were the JII closing price data from 2000 to 2020 using the Black Scholes model and the GARCH model with the Collar strategy.\\nFindings – Option with the Collar strategy provided more benefits in crises than without Option. In crisis conditions, the Option with the GARCH method and the collar strategy provided a higher average profit of 3.07% on the one-month Option and 7.01% on the three-month Option than without using the Option with the collar strategy. In non-crisis conditions, the Option using the GARCH method, and the collar strategy provided a 0.16% higher average profit at one-month maturity than without the Option. Meanwhile, the average profit decreased by 1.45% at the three-month maturity. The collar strategy resulted in less volatility. Without a collar strategy, JII volatility was 103%. The collar strategy produced maximum volatility of 12.71%, 15.18%, and 17.14%. The findings also revealed that the GARCH model was better than the Black Scholes based on the AMSE value obtained in crisis conditions with a maturity of one month and three months and in non-crisis conditions with a maturity of one month. Meanwhile, the Black Scholes model showed better results in non-crisis conditions with a maturity of three months.\\nNovelty – Based on the research result, the Option with a collar strategy is effective for hedging in crisis conditions. This research assesses the collar strategy with several different maturity values to get the most effective value.\\nType of Paper: Empirical\\nJEL Classification: G11, G13.\\nKeywords: Black Scholes; Collar Strategy; GARCH; Jakarta Islamic Index; Option Contracts.\\nReference to this paper should be made as follows: Hendrawan, R; Arifin, Z. (2023). Comparison of Black-Scholes and GARCH Option Models on The Jakarta Islamic Index with Collar Strategy, J. Fin. Bank. Review, 7(4), 16 – 27. https://doi.org/10.35609/jfbr.2023.7.4(2)\",\"PeriodicalId\":246150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GATR Journal of Finance and Banking Review Vol. 7 (4) January - March 2023\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GATR Journal of Finance and Banking Review Vol. 7 (4) January - March 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35609/jfbr.2023.7.4(2)\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GATR Journal of Finance and Banking Review Vol. 7 (4) January - March 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35609/jfbr.2023.7.4(2)","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标——2000年7月3日,雅加达伊斯兰指数(JII)的建立标志着印尼伊斯兰经济的复兴。从2000年到2020年,印度尼西亚在2008年和2020年经历了两次经济危机。这些危机也对JII的高价格波动产生了影响。通过套期保值,资产可以避免重大损失。其中一种对冲策略是带项圈策略的期权合约。方法-本研究中分析的数据是2000年至2020年JII收盘价数据,使用Black Scholes模型和GARCH模型与Collar策略。研究结果-期权与衣领策略提供了更多的利益在危机比没有期权。在危机情况下,采用GARCH方法和套圈策略的期权比不使用套圈策略的期权提供了更高的平均利润,一个月期权为3.07%,三个月期权为7.01%。在非危机条件下,使用GARCH方法的期权和套圈策略提供的一个月到期的平均利润比不使用期权高0.16%。与此同时,3个月期平均利润下降了1.45%。项圈策略减少了波动性。如果没有项圈策略,JII的波动率为103%。领圈策略产生的最大波动率分别为12.71%、15.18%和17.14%。GARCH模型在期限为1个月和3个月的危机条件和期限为1个月的非危机条件下的AMSE值优于Black Scholes模型。同时,Black Scholes模型在非危机条件下,期限为3个月的结果更好。新颖性——根据研究结果,在危机条件下,套期保值是有效的。本研究以不同成熟度值来评估领圈策略,以获得最有效值。论文类型:EmpiricalJEL分类:G11、G13。关键词:布莱克·斯科尔斯;领策略;GARCH;雅加达伊斯兰指数;期权合约。本文的参考文献如下:Hendrawan, R;阿里芬,Z.(2023)。雅加达伊斯兰指数的Black-Scholes期权模型与GARCH期权模型的比较[j]。评论,7(4),16 - 27。https://doi.org/10.35609/jfbr.2023.7.4 (2)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Black-Scholes and GARCH Option Models on The Jakarta Islamic Index with Collar Strategy
Objective –The revival of the Islamic economy in Indonesia was marked by the establishment of the Jakarta Islamic Index (JII) on July 3, 2000. From 2000 to 2020, two economic crises hit Indonesia in 2008 and 2020. These crises also had an impact on the high price fluctuations of JII. Assets can be protected from significant losses by hedging. One of the hedging strategies was option contracts with a collar strategy. Methodology – The data analysed in this research were the JII closing price data from 2000 to 2020 using the Black Scholes model and the GARCH model with the Collar strategy. Findings – Option with the Collar strategy provided more benefits in crises than without Option. In crisis conditions, the Option with the GARCH method and the collar strategy provided a higher average profit of 3.07% on the one-month Option and 7.01% on the three-month Option than without using the Option with the collar strategy. In non-crisis conditions, the Option using the GARCH method, and the collar strategy provided a 0.16% higher average profit at one-month maturity than without the Option. Meanwhile, the average profit decreased by 1.45% at the three-month maturity. The collar strategy resulted in less volatility. Without a collar strategy, JII volatility was 103%. The collar strategy produced maximum volatility of 12.71%, 15.18%, and 17.14%. The findings also revealed that the GARCH model was better than the Black Scholes based on the AMSE value obtained in crisis conditions with a maturity of one month and three months and in non-crisis conditions with a maturity of one month. Meanwhile, the Black Scholes model showed better results in non-crisis conditions with a maturity of three months. Novelty – Based on the research result, the Option with a collar strategy is effective for hedging in crisis conditions. This research assesses the collar strategy with several different maturity values to get the most effective value. Type of Paper: Empirical JEL Classification: G11, G13. Keywords: Black Scholes; Collar Strategy; GARCH; Jakarta Islamic Index; Option Contracts. Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Hendrawan, R; Arifin, Z. (2023). Comparison of Black-Scholes and GARCH Option Models on The Jakarta Islamic Index with Collar Strategy, J. Fin. Bank. Review, 7(4), 16 – 27. https://doi.org/10.35609/jfbr.2023.7.4(2)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信