Design of Sustainable Supply Chain Performance Monitoring System for Construction Material Management: Sustainable Balanced Scorecard – SCOR – ISO 14001 Model

The construction sector carries out various business activities, ranging from procurement of construction materials, production of building materials and materials, transportation and distribution of materials and materials, as well as the design of building projects or other infrastructure facilities. Of the various activities in the construction sector, each activity can have an impact on the environment. Sustainability supply chain (SSCM) is a concept in the supply chain process that pays attention to three aspects, namely social, economic, and environmental in carrying out supply chain activities. This SSCM concept integrates these three aspects to obtain a sustainable supply chain process. Evaluation of material management activities, especially social and environmental aspects in the supply chain, can be measured through a supply chain performance sustainability approach. This study uses the Sustainable Balanced Scorecard model to map the supply chain strategy and the Supply Chain Operational Reference model to map business processes and determine metrics and ISO 14001 as a clause for the work environment. Based on the integration of the two models, a performance measurement metric is obtained which is used as a Key Performance Indicator (KPI) in measuring a sustainable supply chain. Based on the perspective of the BSC model, the research in this research uses three BSC perspectives, namely the financial perspective, the internal business process perspective, and the learning and growth perspective. These three perspectives were chosen based on the company’s material management business processes. All company strategies that have been mapped into the previous BSC perspective are remapped with an overview of the relationship between strategies across perspectives. The priority vector shows the weight of each criterion from the matrix. In the financial perspective indicators, weighting is not carried out because the indicators in the financial perspective are not compared to the PCJM questionnaire. The criteria assessment is said to be consistent if the value of the Consistency Ratio is the Consistency Index divided by the Random Index 0.1. Based on the results of the consistency test, it is known that the value of the importance scale is fairly consistent because the entire consistency ratio value is less than 0.1. This research obtains 20 KPIs, which are divided into financial, internal business process and learning & growth perspectives. Based on data collection and processing, the metrics/indicators used are one (1) indicator from the financial perspective, sixteen (16) indicators from the Internal Business Process perspective and three (3) indicators from the Learning & Growth perspective.